Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
Česko
EspañaVS
Mazda CX-80 vs Skoda Octavia Combi comparison
Compare performance (327 HP vs 204 HP), boot space and price (49,300 £ vs 25,600 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mazda CX-80 or Skoda Octavia Combi?
Mazda CX-80 vs Skoda Octavia Combi: Key differences
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
CX-80
Costs and Efficiency:
Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.
Skoda Octavia Combi is substantially cheaper – starting at 25,600 £ , while the Mazda CX-80 costs 49,300 £ . That’s a price difference of around 23,751 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Mazda CX-80 uses 4 L/100km and is moderately more efficient than the Skoda Octavia Combi with 4.4 L/100km. The difference is about 0.4 L/100km.
Octavia Combi
Engine and Performance:
Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.
When it comes to engine power, the Mazda CX-80 offers noticeably more power – delivering 327 HP compared to 204 HP. That’s roughly 123 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Skoda Octavia Combi is very slightly quicker – completing the sprint in 6.7 s, while the Mazda CX-80 takes 6.8 s. That’s about 0.1 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Mazda CX-80 delivers noticeably more torque with 550 Nm compared to 360 Nm. That’s about 190 Nm more.
CX-80
Space and Everyday Use:
Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.
Seats: Mazda CX-80 offers more seats – 7 vs 5.
In terms of curb weight, Skoda Octavia Combi is clearly lighter – 1,366 kg compared to 2,131 kg. The difference is around 765 kg.
Looking at boot space, the Skoda Octavia Combi offers considerably more boot space – 640 L compared to 258 L. That’s a difference of about 382 L.
When it comes to payload, the Mazda CX-80 carries somewhat more – 650 kg compared to 534 kg. That’s a difference of about 116 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The Mazda CX-80 holds a solid overall lead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
from £49,300
Mazda CX-80
Mazda CX-80
Skoda Octavia Combi
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Mazda CX-80
The Mazda CX-80 brings polished, near-premium styling and a cabin that feels far classier than its badge might imply. It steers with a composed, engaging character and packs the sensible practicality families want — with just enough flair to make school runs feel a little less ordinary.
details
Skoda Octavia Combi
The Skoda Octavia Combi is a practical, well‑packaged estate that delivers generous and flexible interior space ideal for families or active owners. Its sensible cabin layout, comfortable ride and solid reputation for reliability make it a pragmatic choice for buyers who value utility over flash.
details
Mazda CX-80
Skoda Octavia Combi
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
49,300 - 61,400 £
|
Price
25,600 - 39,600 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
4 - 5.6 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
4.4 - 6.9 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
60 km
|
Electric Range
-
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
91 - 146 g/km
|
co2
113 - 157 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
Estate
|
|
Seats
7
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
2,131 - 2,240 kg
|
Curb weight
1,366 - 1,553 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
258 L
|
Trunk capacity
640 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,890 mm
|
Width
1,829 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
649 - 650 kg
|
Payload
502 - 534 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid, Diesel MHEV
|
Engine Type
Petrol, Petrol MHEV, Diesel
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
|
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic, Manual Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive, Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
254 - 327 HP
|
Power HP
116 - 204 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.8 - 8.4 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.7 - 10.7 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
500 - 550 Nm
|
Torque
220 - 360 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
4 - 6
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
|
Power kW
187 - 241 kW
|
Power kW
85 - 150 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
2,488 - 3,283 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1,498 - 1,984 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2025
|
Model Year
2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
B, E
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, F, D, C
|
|
Brand
Mazda
|
Brand
Skoda
|
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved.
The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.