Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
Česko
EspañaVS
Mazda CX-80 vs Skoda Superb Combi comparison
Compare performance (327 HP vs 265 HP), boot space and price (49,300 £ vs 36,100 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mazda CX-80 or Skoda Superb Combi?
Mazda CX-80 vs Skoda Superb Combi: Key differences
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
CX-80
Costs and Efficiency:
When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.
Skoda Superb Combi is markedly cheaper – starting at 36,100 £ , while the Mazda CX-80 costs 49,300 £ . That’s a price difference of around 13,243 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Skoda Superb Combi uses 1.2 L/100km and is substantially more efficient than the Mazda CX-80 with 4 L/100km. The difference is about 2.8 L/100km.
As for electric range, the Skoda Superb Combi offers significantly more range – reaching up to 137 km, about 77 km more than the Mazda CX-80.
Superb Combi
Engine and Performance:
Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.
When it comes to engine power, the Mazda CX-80 offers a bit more power – delivering 327 HP compared to 265 HP. That’s roughly 62 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Skoda Superb Combi is moderately quicker – completing the sprint in 5.7 s, while the Mazda CX-80 takes 6.8 s. That’s about 1.1 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Mazda CX-80 delivers clearly more torque with 550 Nm compared to 400 Nm. That’s about 150 Nm more.
CX-80
Space and Everyday Use:
Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.
Seats: Mazda CX-80 offers more seats – 7 vs 5.
In terms of curb weight, Skoda Superb Combi is clearly lighter – 1,575 kg compared to 2,131 kg. The difference is around 556 kg.
Looking at boot space, the Skoda Superb Combi offers significantly more boot space – 690 L compared to 258 L. That’s a difference of about 432 L.
When it comes to payload, the Mazda CX-80 carries a bit more – 650 kg compared to 584 kg. That’s a difference of about 66 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The Skoda Superb Combi is clearly superior overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
from £36,100
Skoda Superb Combi
Mazda CX-80
Skoda Superb Combi
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Mazda CX-80
The Mazda CX-80 brings polished, near-premium styling and a cabin that feels far classier than its badge might imply. It steers with a composed, engaging character and packs the sensible practicality families want — with just enough flair to make school runs feel a little less ordinary.
details
Skoda Superb Combi
The Skoda Superb Combi is the practical hero of the estate world, offering cavernous space and a calm, refined ride that makes family life feel effortless. Its clever features, understated design and no-nonsense value make it a smart pick for buyers who want Germanic engineering without the badge premium — and it even manages to stay surprisingly stylish while doing all the heavy lifting.
details
Mazda CX-80
Skoda Superb Combi
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
49,300 - 61,400 £
|
Price
36,100 - 52,300 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
4 - 5.6 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
1.2 - 7.8 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
60 km
|
Electric Range
128 - 137 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
91 - 146 g/km
|
co2
28 - 178 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
Estate
|
|
Seats
7
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
2,131 - 2,240 kg
|
Curb weight
1,575 - 1,853 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
258 L
|
Trunk capacity
510 - 690 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,890 mm
|
Width
1,849 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
649 - 650 kg
|
Payload
497 - 584 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid, Diesel MHEV
|
Engine Type
Petrol, Petrol MHEV, Diesel, Plugin Hybrid
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
254 - 327 HP
|
Power HP
150 - 265 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.8 - 8.4 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.7 - 9.3 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
500 - 550 Nm
|
Torque
250 - 400 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
4 - 6
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
|
Power kW
187 - 241 kW
|
Power kW
110 - 195 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
2,488 - 3,283 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1,498 - 1,984 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2025
|
Model Year
2,024 - 2,025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
B, E
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, F, D, G, B
|
|
Brand
Mazda
|
Brand
Skoda
|
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved.
The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.