Both models have their strengths – but which one suits you more?
Compare performance, efficiency, price and space directly: Mazda CX-80 or Volvo V90?
When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.
Mazda CX-80 has a evident advantage in terms of price – it starts at 48200 £, while the Volvo V90 costs 62300 £. That’s a price difference of around 14091 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Volvo V90 manages with 0.80 L and is therefore clearly more efficient than the Mazda CX-80 with 1.60 L. The difference is about 0.80 L per 100 km.
As for range, the Volvo V90 performs noticeable better – achieving up to 88 km, about 27 km more than the Mazda CX-80.
Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.
When it comes to engine power, the Volvo V90 has a evident edge – offering 455 HP compared to 327 HP. That’s roughly 128 HP more horsepower.
In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Volvo V90 is significantly quicker – completing the sprint in 4.80 s, while the Mazda CX-80 takes 6.80 s. That’s about 2 s faster.
In terms of top speed, the Mazda CX-80 performs to a small extent better – reaching 219 km/h, while the Volvo V90 tops out at 180 km/h. The difference is around 39 km/h.
There’s also a difference in torque: Volvo V90 pulls noticeable stronger with 709 Nm compared to 550 Nm. That’s about 159 Nm difference.
Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?
Seats: Mazda CX-80 offers distinct more seating capacity – 7 vs 5.
In curb weight, Volvo V90 is hardly perceptible lighter – 2075 kg compared to 2131 kg. The difference is around 56 kg.
In terms of boot space, the Volvo V90 offers clearly more room – 488 L compared to 258 L. That’s a difference of about 230 L.
In maximum load capacity, the Mazda CX-80 performs distinct better – up to 1971 L, which is about 517 L more than the Volvo V90.
When it comes to payload, Mazda CX-80 clearly perceptible takes the win – 650 kg compared to 515 kg. That’s a difference of about 135 kg.
Overall, the Volvo V90 shows itself to be wins the duel decisively and secures the title of DriveDuel Champion.
It convinces with the more balanced overall package and proves to be the more versatile choice for everyday use.
The Mazda CX-80 exemplifies a perfect blend of sophisticated design and dynamic performance, making it a standout model in the SUV market. With its sleek lines and contemporary interior, it delivers a sense of luxury typically reserved for higher-end marques. This model also offers impressive handling and a comfortable ride, ensuring an enjoyable driving experience in various conditions.
detailsThe Volvo V90 embodies the ideal blend of Swedish elegance and practical functionality, making it an attractive choice for those seeking a premium estate vehicle. Its interior exudes sophistication with high-quality materials and a minimalist design that ensures both comfort and style in every journey. On the road, the V90 delivers a smooth driving experience, supported by advanced safety features and cutting-edge technology that enhance both performance and passenger wellbeing.
details|
|
|
|
|
|
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
48200 - 60200 £
|
Price
62300 - 71700 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
1.6 - 5.8 L
|
Consumption L/100km
0.80 L
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
61 km
|
Electric Range
88 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
14.70 kWh
|
|
co2
35 - 151 g/km
|
co2
18 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
70 - 74 L
|
Fuel tank capacity
60 L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
Estate
|
|
Seats
7
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
2131 - 2240 kg
|
Curb weight
2075 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
258 L
|
Trunk capacity
488 L
|
|
Length
4995 mm
|
Length
4945 mm
|
|
Width
1890 mm
|
Width
1879 mm
|
|
Height
1714 mm
|
Height
1472 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1971 L
|
Max trunk capacity
1454 L
|
|
Payload
649 - 650 kg
|
Payload
515 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid, Diesel MHEV
|
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
254 - 327 HP
|
Power HP
398 - 455 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.8 - 8.4 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.8 - 5.5 s
|
|
Max Speed
195 - 219 km/h
|
Max Speed
180 km/h
|
|
Torque
500 - 550 Nm
|
Torque
659 - 709 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
4 - 6
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
|
Power kW
187 - 241 kW
|
Power kW
293 - 335 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
2488 - 3283 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1969 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2024
|
Model Year
2024
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
B, E
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
B
|
|
Brand
Mazda
|
Brand
Volvo
|
The Mazda CX-80 is offered with All-Wheel Drive.
The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.