Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Norge
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
EspañaVS
Mercedes C-Class Sedan vs Land Rover Range Rover Evoque - Differences and prices compared
Compare performance (680 HP vs 269 HP), boot space and price (41200 £ vs 43300 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mercedes C-Class Sedan or Land Rover Range Rover Evoque?
C-Class Sedan
Costs and Efficiency:
Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.
Mercedes C-Class Sedan has a minimal advantage in terms of price – it starts at 41200 £ , while the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque costs 43300 £ . That’s a price difference of around 2119 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Mercedes C-Class Sedan manages with 1.60 L and is therefore significantly more efficient than the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque with 3.70 L. The difference is about 2.10 L per 100 km.
As for electric range, the Mercedes C-Class Sedan performs clearly better – achieving up to 117 km, about 57 km more than the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque.
Range Rover Evoque
Engine and Performance:
Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.
When it comes to engine power, the Mercedes C-Class Sedan has a decisively edge – offering 680 HP compared to 269 HP. That’s roughly 411 HP more horsepower.
In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Mercedes C-Class Sedan is significantly quicker – completing the sprint in 3.40 s, while the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque takes 7.20 s. That’s about 3.80 s faster.
In terms of top speed, the Mercedes C-Class Sedan performs distinct better – reaching 280 km/h, while the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque tops out at 213 km/h. The difference is around 67 km/h.
There’s also a difference in torque: Mercedes C-Class Sedan pulls convincingly stronger with 1020 Nm compared to 540 Nm. That’s about 480 Nm difference.
Ad · Affiliate
As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
C-Class Sedan
Space and Everyday Use:
Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In curb weight, Mercedes C-Class Sedan is barely noticeable lighter – 1695 kg compared to 1792 kg. The difference is around 97 kg.
In terms of boot space, the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque offers minimal more room – 472 L compared to 455 L. That’s a difference of about 17 L.
When it comes to payload, Land Rover Range Rover Evoque slight takes the win – 600 kg compared to 570 kg. That’s a difference of about 30 kg.
Who wins the race?
The Mercedes C-Class Sedan proves to be outperforms in nearly all aspects and therefore becomes our DriveDuel Champion!
Mercedes C-Class Sedan is the better all-rounder in this comparison.
from about £41,200
Mercedes C-Class Sedan
Mercedes C-Class Sedan
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Mercedes C-Class Sedan
The Mercedes C‑Class is the compact executive that dresses like it owns the boulevard, with an interior that blends modern elegance and plush comfort to make everyday driving feel unexpectedly special. On the road it pairs poise with a hint of cheeky agility, rewarding drivers who want refinement without forfeiting a touch of fun — and yes, it still looks great in the driveway.
details
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque
1 (1 Reviews)
The Range Rover Evoque turns heads with a compact, sculpted silhouette and an interior that feels more boutique hotel than utility vehicle. It delivers composed, playful handling around town while keeping enough ruggedness for weekend escapes — perfect for buyers who want luxury without the ostentation.
details
Mercedes C-Class Sedan
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
41200 - 103100 £
|
Price
43300 - 64800 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
1.6 - 9 L
|
Consumption L/100km
3.7 - 7.8 L
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
11 - 117 km
|
Electric Range
60 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
19.50 kWh
|
Battery Capacity
11.50 kWh
|
|
co2
41 - 205 g/km
|
co2
85 - 177 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
40 - 66 L
|
Fuel tank capacity
57 - 67 L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
Sedan
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
4
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
1695 - 2195 kg
|
Curb weight
1792 - 2157 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
280 - 455 L
|
Trunk capacity
472 L
|
|
Length
4751 - 4842 mm
|
Length
4371 mm
|
|
Width
1820 - 1900 mm
|
Width
1900 mm
|
|
Height
1438 - 1458 mm
|
Height
1649 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
1156 L
|
|
Payload
480 - 570 kg
|
Payload
503 - 600 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Plugin Hybrid, Diesel MHEV
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Diesel MHEV, Plugin Hybrid
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
183 - 680 HP
|
Power HP
160 - 269 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
3.4 - 8.6 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.2 - 10.3 s
|
|
Max Speed
230 - 280 km/h
|
Max Speed
190 - 213 km/h
|
|
Torque
250 - 1020 Nm
|
Torque
260 - 540 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
|
|
Power kW
135 - 500 kW
|
Power kW
118 - 198 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1496 - 1999 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1498 - 1998 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2024 - 2025
|
Model Year
2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, B, D, G
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
G, F, B
|
|
Brand
Mercedes-Benz
|
Brand
Land Rover
|
Is the Mercedes C-Class Sedan offered with different drivetrains?
The Mercedes C-Class Sedan is offered with Rear-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.
The prices shown are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted for local VAT. Local registration taxes (e.g. NoVA, BPM or CO2 malus) are not included. This information is not legally binding.