What drive types are available for the Mazda CX-60?

The Mazda CX-60 is offered with All-Wheel Drive or Rear-Wheel Drive.

What is the maximum horsepower of the Mazda CX-60?

Depending on the version, the Mazda CX-60 delivers up to 327 HP.

What are the consumption figures for the Mazda CX-60 in liters per 100 km?

Based on WLTP testing, consumption is around 3.80 L.

What is the Mazda CX-60’s maximum WLTP range?

Depending on equipment, the WLTP range reaches up to 63 km.

How much luggage fits in the Mazda CX-60?

Depending on configuration, up to 570 L fit inside.

What drivetrain options does the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque have?

The Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is offered with Front-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.

How powerful is the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque's engine?

The Land Rover Range Rover Evoque reaches a peak output of 269 HP, depending on the model.

What is the fuel consumption of the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque according to the manufacturer?

Fuel consumption according to the manufacturer is 3.70 L.

What is the battery capacity of the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque?

The battery offers a capacity of 11.50 kWh.

What is the top speed of the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque?

Depending on the model, top speed is 213 km/h.

What are the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque’s length, width and height?

Length 4371 mm, width 1900 mm, height 1649 mm – those are the dimensions of the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque.

Mazda CX-60 vs Land Rover Range Rover Evoque - Differences and prices compared

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

CX-60

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.

Land Rover Range Rover Evoque has a minimal advantage in terms of price – it starts at 43300 £, while the Mazda CX-60 costs 43700 £. That’s a price difference of around 386 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Land Rover Range Rover Evoque manages with 3.70 L and is therefore barely noticeable more efficient than the Mazda CX-60 with 3.80 L. The difference is about 0.10 L per 100 km.

As for range, the Mazda CX-60 performs barely noticeable better – achieving up to 63 km, about 3 km more than the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque.

Range Rover Evoque

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the Mazda CX-60 has a a bit edge – offering 327 HP compared to 269 HP. That’s roughly 58 HP more horsepower.

In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Mazda CX-60 is clearly perceptible quicker – completing the sprint in 5.80 s, while the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque takes 7.20 s. That’s about 1.40 s faster.

There’s also a difference in torque: Mazda CX-60 pulls hardly perceptible stronger with 550 Nm compared to 540 Nm. That’s about 10 Nm difference.

CX-60

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In curb weight, Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is minimal lighter – 1792 kg compared to 1890 kg. The difference is around 98 kg.

In terms of boot space, the Mazda CX-60 offers somewhat more room – 570 L compared to 472 L. That’s a difference of about 98 L.

When it comes to payload, Mazda CX-60 barely noticeable takes the win – 612 kg compared to 600 kg. That’s a difference of about 12 kg.

Who wins the race?

The Mazda CX-60 proves to be wins the duel decisively and therefore becomes our DriveDuel Champion!
Mazda CX-60 is the better all-rounder in this comparison.

Reviews Mazda CX-60

5 (1 Reviews)

Reviews Land Rover Range Rover Evoque

1 (1 Reviews)

Top Car Comparisons

Mazda CX-60

Skoda Kodiaq

VS

The Mazda CX-60 feels like a compact luxury tourer — beautifully detailed cabin, taut chassis and an engaging powertrain (there’s even a slick PHEV option) that rewards drivers who care about style and dynamics. By contrast, the Skoda Kodiaq is the family workhorse: cavernous interior, optional …

Mazda CX-60

VW Tayron

VS

The Mazda CX-60 feels like a near‑premium Japanese SUV — taut handling, classy materials and a driver-focused personality — while the VW Tayron is the steady, sensible German: roomy, practical and unabashedly conservative. If you crave engaging dynamics and a bit of style, the CX-60 will put a …

Costs and Consumption
Price 43700 - 57900 £	Price 43300 - 64800 £
Consumption L/100km 3.8 - 5.2 L	Consumption L/100km 3.7 - 7.8 L
Consumption kWh/100km -	Consumption kWh/100km -
Electric Range 63 km	Electric Range 60 km
Battery Capacity -	Battery Capacity 11.50 kWh
co2 85 - 137 g/km	co2 85 - 177 g/km
Fuel tank capacity -	Fuel tank capacity 57 - 67 L

Dimensions and Body
Body Type SUV	Body Type SUV
Seats 5	Seats 5
Doors -	Doors 5
Curb weight 1890 - 2055 kg	Curb weight 1792 - 2157 kg
Trunk capacity 570 L	Trunk capacity 472 L
Length -	Length 4371 mm
Width 1890 mm	Width 1900 mm
Height -	Height 1649 mm
Max trunk capacity -	Max trunk capacity 1156 L
Payload 581 - 612 kg	Payload 503 - 600 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type Plugin Hybrid, Diesel MHEV	Engine Type Petrol MHEV, Diesel MHEV, Plugin Hybrid
Transmission Automatic	Transmission Manuel, Automatic
Transmission Detail Automatic Gearbox	Transmission Detail Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type All-Wheel Drive, Rear-Wheel Drive	Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP 200 - 327 HP	Power HP 160 - 269 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h 5.8 - 8.4 s	Acceleration 0-100km/h 7.2 - 10.3 s
Max Speed -	Max Speed 190 - 213 km/h
Torque 450 - 550 Nm	Torque 260 - 540 Nm
Number of Cylinders 4 - 6	Number of Cylinders 3 - 4
Power kW 147 - 241 kW	Power kW 118 - 198 kW
Engine capacity 2488 - 3283 cm3	Engine capacity 1498 - 1998 cm3