VS

Mazda CX-60 vs Land Rover Range Rover Evoque – Which one offers the better deal?

Everyday use, family trips or long-distance drives – here’s where the differences show.
Discover whether Mazda CX-60 or Land Rover Range Rover Evoque fits your lifestyle better.

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

CX-60 @ de.mazda-press.com

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.

Mazda CX-60 has a minimal advantage in terms of price – it starts at 41900 £, while the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque costs 43300 £. That’s a price difference of around 1380 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Mazda CX-60 manages with 1.40 L and is therefore convincingly more efficient than the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque with 3.70 L. The difference is about 2.30 L per 100 km.

As for range, the Mazda CX-60 performs barely noticeable better – achieving up to 64 km, about 4 km more than the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque.

Range Rover Evoque @ media.landrover.com

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the Mazda CX-60 has a a bit edge – offering 327 HP compared to 269 HP. That’s roughly 58 HP more horsepower.

In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Mazda CX-60 is clearly perceptible quicker – completing the sprint in 5.80 s, while the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque takes 7.20 s. That’s about 1.40 s faster.

In terms of top speed, the Mazda CX-60 performs hardly perceptible better – reaching 219 km/h, while the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque tops out at 213 km/h. The difference is around 6 km/h.

There’s also a difference in torque: Mazda CX-60 pulls hardly perceptible stronger with 550 Nm compared to 540 Nm. That’s about 10 Nm difference.

CX-60 @ de.mazda-press.com

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In curb weight, Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is minimal lighter – 1792 kg compared to 1890 kg. The difference is around 98 kg.

In terms of boot space, the Mazda CX-60 offers somewhat more room – 570 L compared to 472 L. That’s a difference of about 98 L.

In maximum load capacity, the Mazda CX-60 performs clearly perceptible better – up to 1726 L, which is about 570 L more than the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque.

When it comes to payload, Mazda CX-60 barely noticeable takes the win – 612 kg compared to 600 kg. That’s a difference of about 12 kg.

Who wins the race?

The Mazda CX-60 proves to be wins the duel decisively and therefore becomes our DriveDuel Champion!
Mazda CX-60 is the better all-rounder in this comparison.

from about £41,900
2022_mazda_cx-60_tr_rw_act_006_highres

Mazda CX-60

  • Engine Type : Plugin Hybrid, Diesel MHEV
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : All-Wheel Drive, Rear-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 200 - 327 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 1.4 - 5.4 L
  • Electric Range : 64 km
details

Mazda CX-60

5 (1)
rate

The Mazda CX-60 exudes a sense of elegance and sophistication with its sleek design and refined styling. Inside, the cabin offers a harmonious blend of comfort and advanced technology, ensuring an enjoyable driving experience. On the road, the CX-60 delivers impressive performance and handling, making it a standout choice for those who appreciate driving dynamics.

details
2022_mazda_cx-60_tr_rw_act_006_highres @ de.mazda-press.com
2022_mazda_cx-60_tr_rw_act_008_highres @ de.mazda-press.com
2022_mazda_cx-60_europe_still_010_highres @ de.mazda-press.com
2022_mazda_cx-60_germany_rw_int_002_highres @ de.mazda-press.com

Land Rover Range Rover Evoque

1 (1)
rate

The Land Rover Range Rover Evoque combines refined luxury with robust off-road capabilities. Its sleek design and high-quality interior materials create an elegant yet comfortable driving experience. Advanced technology features and superior handling make it a versatile choice for both city and countryside adventures.

details
RR_EVQ_20MY_Dynamic_ND_221118_02_big @ media.landrover.com
067rrevq20mysilverdynamic045 @ media.landrover.com
Range Rover Evoque Plug-In Hybrid_MJ20jpg (15) @ media.landrover.com
RR_EVQ_21MY_INTERIOR_260820_S44_03 @ media.landrover.com

Similar Comparisons

Mazda CX-60
VW Tayron
VS
The Mazda CX-60 feels like a near‑premium Japanese SUV — taut handling, classy materials and a driver-focused personality — while the VW Tayron is the steady, sensible German: roomy, practical and unabashedly conservative. If you crave engaging dynamics and a bit of style, the CX-60 will put a smile on your face; if you need family-friendly space, straightforward tech and everyday reliability, the Tayron is the smarter, less flashy choice.
Mazda CX-5
Mazda CX-60
VS
In the competitive compact SUV segment, the Mazda CX-5 and Mazda CX-60 stand out for their refined designs and driver-focused experiences. While the CX-5 offers a well-rounded blend of comfort and practicality, the CX-60 elevates the driving experience with its more powerful engine options and advanced technology features. Ultimately, the choice between these two models will depend on whether buyers prioritize the CX-5's versatility or the CX-60's premium enhancements.
Mazda CX-60
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque
CX-60
Range Rover Evoque

Costs and Consumption
Price
41900 - 56800 £
Price
43300 - 64800 £
Consumption L/100km
1.4 - 5.4 L
Consumption L/100km
3.7 - 7.8 L
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
64 km
Electric Range
60 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
11.50 kWh
co2
31 - 139 g/km
co2
85 - 177 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
50 - 58 L
Fuel tank capacity
57 - 67 L

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
5
Doors
5
Curb weight
1890 - 2055 kg
Curb weight
1792 - 2157 kg
Trunk capacity
570 L
Trunk capacity
472 L
Length
4745 mm
Length
4371 mm
Width
1890 mm
Width
1900 mm
Height
1680 - 1688 mm
Height
1649 mm
Max trunk capacity
1726 L
Max trunk capacity
1156 L
Payload
581 - 612 kg
Payload
503 - 600 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid, Diesel MHEV
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Diesel MHEV, Plugin Hybrid
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive, Rear-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
200 - 327 HP
Power HP
160 - 269 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.8 - 8.4 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.2 - 10.3 s
Max Speed
200 - 219 km/h
Max Speed
190 - 213 km/h
Torque
450 - 550 Nm
Torque
260 - 540 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4 - 6
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
Power kW
147 - 241 kW
Power kW
118 - 198 kW
Engine capacity
2488 - 3283 cm3
Engine capacity
1498 - 1998 cm3

General
Model Year
2024
Model Year
2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
B, D, E
CO2 Efficiency Class
G, F, B
Brand
Mazda
Brand
Land Rover

Similar Comparisons

BMW X1
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque
VS
Ford Kuga
Mazda CX-60
VS
In this head-to-head comparison, the Ford Kuga impresses with its sporty handling and fuel-efficient hybrid options, making it a strong contender for those seeking versatility in urban settings. Meanwhile, the Mazda CX-60 stands out with its premium interior and advanced technology features, offering a more luxurious driving experience. Both models cater to different preferences, but each delivers a compelling package for compact SUV enthusiasts.
Mazda CX-60
Toyota Highlander
VS
In the competitive landscape of SUVs, the Mazda CX-60 stands out with its stylish design and dynamic driving experience, appealing to those who value both performance and aesthetics. Meanwhile, the Toyota Highlander offers a spacious interior and a reputation for reliability, making it an excellent choice for families seeking comfort and practicality. Ultimately, choosing between these two models boils down to personal preference, as each caters to distinct needs in the booming SUV market.
BYD Seal U
Mazda CX-60
VS
Honda CR-V
Mazda CX-60
VS
In the competitive landscape of compact SUVs, the Honda CR-V and Mazda CX-60 each bring distinctive strengths to the table. The Honda CR-V continues to be a crowd favorite with its spacious interior, impressive fuel efficiency, and strong reliability ratings. Meanwhile, the Mazda CX-60 stands out with its dynamic handling, luxurious interior designs, and a more powerful engine lineup, making it ideal for those who value performance and upscale features.
Mazda CX-60
Skoda Kodiaq
VS
In the competitive landscape of family SUVs, the Mazda CX-60 and Skoda Kodiaq stand out with their unique blend of style and practicality. The CX-60 impresses with its premium interior and dynamic driving experience, while the Kodiaq offers versatile space and impressive functionality, making it a solid choice for larger families. Ultimately, the decision between these two models may come down to personal preference, as both deliver exceptional value in their respective categories.
Mazda CX-60
Genesis GV70
VS
Kia Sportage
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque
VS
What drive types are available for the Mazda CX-60?

The Mazda CX-60 is offered with All-Wheel Drive or Rear-Wheel Drive.

The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.