Both models have their strengths – but which one suits you more?
Compare performance, efficiency, price and space directly: Mercedes Citan or Toyota Proace City Compact Van?
Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.
Toyota Proace City Compact Van has a barely noticeable advantage in terms of price – it starts at 21200 £, while the Mercedes Citan costs 22400 £. That’s a price difference of around 1263 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Mercedes Citan manages with 5.20 L and is therefore minimal more efficient than the Toyota Proace City Compact Van with 5.40 L. The difference is about 0.20 L per 100 km.
In terms of energy consumption, the advantage goes to the Toyota Proace City Compact Van: with 18.50 kWh per 100 km, it’s hardly perceptible more efficient than the Mercedes Citan with 19.30 kWh. That’s a difference of about 0.80 kWh.
As for range, the Toyota Proace City Compact Van performs slightly better – achieving up to 337 km, about 57 km more than the Mercedes Citan.
Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.
When it comes to engine power, the Toyota Proace City Compact Van has a slight edge – offering 136 HP compared to 131 HP. That’s roughly 5 HP more horsepower.
In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Toyota Proace City Compact Van is to a small extent quicker – completing the sprint in 11.10 s, while the Mercedes Citan takes 13 s. That’s about 1.90 s faster.
In terms of top speed, the Toyota Proace City Compact Van performs minimal better – reaching 186 km/h, while the Mercedes Citan tops out at 183 km/h. The difference is around 3 km/h.
There’s also a difference in torque: Toyota Proace City Compact Van pulls hardly perceptible stronger with 300 Nm compared to 270 Nm. That’s about 30 Nm difference.
Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In curb weight, Toyota Proace City Compact Van is to a small extent lighter – 1358 kg compared to 1556 kg. The difference is around 198 kg.
In maximum load capacity, the Toyota Proace City Compact Van performs slightly better – up to 4300 L, which is about 640 L more than the Mercedes Citan.
When it comes to payload, Toyota Proace City Compact Van evident takes the win – 921 kg compared to 644 kg. That’s a difference of about 277 kg.
Overall, the Toyota Proace City Compact Van shows itself to be is largely superior and secures the title of DriveDuel Champion.
It convinces with the more balanced overall package and proves to be the more versatile choice for everyday use.
The Mercedes-Benz Citan High Roof Van is a versatile option in the compact van segment, offering a perfect blend of practicality and style. Its sleek design combined with the brand's hallmark attention to detail ensures that it stands out on city streets and motorways alike. Inside, the spacious cabin provides ample room for passengers or cargo, making it an ideal choice for both urban professionals and families seeking flexibility.
detailsThe Toyota Proace City is a versatile compact van designed to cater to the needs of businesses and families alike. With its spacious interior and efficient engine options, it ensures a comfortable and agile driving experience, making it ideal for urban and suburban environments. The Proace City also offers a range of advanced safety features and connectivity options, ensuring both security and convenience on the road.
details|
|
|
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
22400 - 30100 £
|
Price
21200 - 37700 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
5.2 - 7.4 L
|
Consumption L/100km
5.4 - 6.6 L
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
19.3 - 20.7 kWh
|
Consumption kWh/100km
18.50 kWh
|
|
Electric Range
265 - 280 km
|
Electric Range
337 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
45 kWh
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
0 - 167 g/km
|
co2
0 - 150 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
54 L
|
Fuel tank capacity
50 - 61 L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
High Roof Estate
|
Body Type
Cargo Van
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
2 - 5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
4 - 5
|
|
Curb weight
1556 - 2010 kg
|
Curb weight
1358 - 1837 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
0 - 551 L
|
Trunk capacity
-
|
|
Length
4498 - 4922 mm
|
Length
4401 - 4751 mm
|
|
Width
1859 mm
|
Width
1848 mm
|
|
Height
1811 - 1830 mm
|
Height
1860 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1979 - 3660 L
|
Max trunk capacity
3300 - 4300 L
|
|
Payload
485 - 644 kg
|
Payload
560 - 921 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Petrol, Diesel, Electric
|
Engine Type
Electric, Diesel, Petrol
|
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
|
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic, Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox, Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
95 - 131 HP
|
Power HP
102 - 136 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
13 - 15.5 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
11.1 - 13.2 s
|
|
Max Speed
132 - 183 km/h
|
Max Speed
135 - 186 km/h
|
|
Torque
200 - 270 Nm
|
Torque
205 - 300 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
|
|
Power kW
70 - 96 kW
|
Power kW
75 - 100 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1332 - 1461 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1199 - 1499 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2021 - 2024
|
Model Year
2024
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
F, E, A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A, E
|
|
Brand
Mercedes-Benz
|
Brand
Toyota
|
Available configurations include Front-Wheel Drive.
The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.