Compare performance (131 HP vs 340 HP), boot space and price (22,400 £ vs 43,600 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mercedes Citan or VW ID. Buzz Cargo?
In the ever-evolving automotive landscape, two standout models, the Mercedes Citan and the VW ID. Buzz Transporter, represent the fusion of practicality and innovation. Both vehicles cater to distinct needs, yet share a commitment to efficiency and versatility. Here's a deep dive into what makes these contenders tick.
The Mercedes Citan is designed as a high-roof wagon, adept at balancing passenger and cargo needs. With options for petrol, diesel, and electric engines, it offers flexibility for varied drivers. The VW ID. Buzz Transporter, on the other hand, is a cargo van purely focused on electric propulsion. Its retro-inspired yet modern design stands out, particularly with its spacious cargo capacity for work and recreational use.
The Citan offers a variety of engine options, including a petrol engine with up to 131 HP and a diesel variant peaking at 122 HP, supported by both manual and automatic transmissions. Its electric model boasts a power output of 116 HP with a commendable torque of up to 270 Nm. The vehicle records a 0-100 km/h acceleration time of approximately 13 seconds and an electric range reaching up to 280 km.
The VW ID. Buzz Transporter, committed to an all-electric drive, offers various power configurations, with the most robust delivering an impressive 340 HP and a torque of up to 679 Nm. It supports both rear-wheel and all-wheel-drive versions, offering an electric range up to 455 km. With automatic transmission, this van seamlessly combines performance with efficiency.
In terms of size, the Citan measures around 4,498 mm in length, accommodating five seats comfortably, and providing up to 551 liters of trunk space. This makes it a versatile choice for small businesses or families needing flexibility.
The ID. Buzz Transporter's length of 4,712 mm, combined with its width of 1,985 mm, houses three seats and prioritizes cargo over passenger capacity. This positions it perfectly for urban logistics and small-scale hauling tasks.
Efficiency benchmarks see the Citan stretching its boundaries with a consumption rate of 5.3 to 7.1 L/100km for conventional engines, and an electric consumption of 19.3 to 20.7 kWh/100 km. Its CO2 class ranges from A to F, influenced by the choice of engine.
The ID. Buzz Transporter makes a bold statement with zero tailpipe emissions, achieving consumption figures of around 19.2 to 20.3 kWh/100km. Its CO2 Efficiency Class stands at A, highlighting its commitment to a sustainable future.
Choosing between the Mercedes Citan and the VW ID. Buzz Transporter boils down to intended use. The Citan offers a spectrum of powertrains and is ideal for those seeking a balanced solution with urban utility. For those in search of a modern, eco-friendly cargo van, the ID. Buzz Transporter makes a compelling case with its futuristic technology and environmental consciousness.
Ultimately, both vehicles are thoughtful expressions of their brand's vision, redefining what it means to drive in the modern age. Whether your journey takes you along city streets or requires sustained cargo transport, these models deliver with grace and innovation.
Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.
Mercedes Citan is considerably cheaper – starting at 22,400 £ , while the VW ID. Buzz Cargo costs 43,600 £ . That’s a price difference of around 21,121 £.
In terms of energy consumption, the VW ID. Buzz Cargo is only slightly more efficient: consuming 19.2 kWh/100km compared to 19.3 kWh/100km for the Mercedes Citan. That’s a difference of about 0.1 kWh/100km.
As for electric range, the VW ID. Buzz Cargo offers markedly more range – reaching up to 455 km, about 175 km more than the Mercedes Citan.
Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.
When it comes to engine power, the VW ID. Buzz Cargo offers significantly more power – delivering 340 HP compared to 131 HP. That’s roughly 209 HP more horsepower.
Looking at top speed, the Mercedes Citan is moderately faster – reaching 183 km/h, while the VW ID. Buzz Cargo tops out at 160 km/h. The difference is around 23 km/h.
There’s also a difference in torque: the VW ID. Buzz Cargo delivers considerably more torque with 679 Nm compared to 270 Nm. That’s about 409 Nm more.
Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.
Seats: Mercedes Citan offers more seats – 5 vs 3.
In terms of curb weight, Mercedes Citan is clearly lighter – 1,556 kg compared to 2,264 kg. The difference is around 708 kg.
For maximum load capacity, the VW ID. Buzz Cargo offers only slightly more capacity – up to 3,900 L, about 240 L more than the Mercedes Citan.
When it comes to payload, the VW ID. Buzz Cargo carries somewhat more – 753 kg compared to 644 kg. That’s a difference of about 109 kg.
The VW ID. Buzz Cargo holds a decisive overall lead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The Mercedes Citan is a clever urban van that dresses sensible practicality in a surprisingly premium suit, making light work of deliveries and family duties without feeling like a workhorse. With a calm, car-like driving feel, clever interior packaging and the Mercedes badge up front, it’s a smart pick for buyers who want function with a touch of luxury and a wink of personality.
details
The VW ID. Buzz Cargo marries retro Volkswagen charm with a thoroughly modern electric work van, offering a surprisingly spacious and practical load area wrapped in friendly, iconic styling. It's a smart pick for urban tradespeople and small businesses who want quiet, effortless driving, lower running costs and easy maneuverability — with a healthy dash of nostalgia on the job.
details
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
22,400 - 30,100 £
|
Price
43,600 - 51,400 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
5.2 - 7.4 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
19.3 - 20.7 kWh/100km
|
Consumption kWh/100km
19.2 - 20.3 kWh/100km
|
|
Electric Range
265 - 280 km
|
Electric Range
330 - 455 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
45 kWh
|
Battery Capacity
59 - 79 kWh
|
|
co2
0 - 167 g/km
|
co2
0 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
54 L
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
High Roof Estate
|
Body Type
Cargo Van
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
3
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
4
|
|
Curb weight
1,556 - 2,010 kg
|
Curb weight
2,264 - 2,510 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
0 - 551 L
|
Trunk capacity
-
|
|
Length
4,498 - 4,922 mm
|
Length
4,712 mm
|
|
Width
1,859 mm
|
Width
1,985 mm
|
|
Height
1,811 - 1,830 mm
|
Height
1,932 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1,979 - 3,660 L
|
Max trunk capacity
3,900 L
|
|
Payload
485 - 644 kg
|
Payload
640 - 753 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Petrol, Diesel, Electric
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic, Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
-
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
95 - 131 HP
|
Power HP
170 - 340 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
13 - 15.5 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
-
|
|
Max Speed
132 - 183 km/h
|
Max Speed
145 - 160 km/h
|
|
Torque
200 - 270 Nm
|
Torque
310 - 679 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
|
Power kW
70 - 96 kW
|
Power kW
125 - 250 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1,332 - 1,461 cm3
|
Engine capacity
-
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2,021 - 2,024
|
Model Year
2,024
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
F, E, A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
|
Brand
Mercedes-Benz
|
Brand
VW
|
Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
España