Compare performance (228 HP vs 269 HP), boot space and price (45,900 £ vs 67,300 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mercedes EQA or Ford Transit Transporter?
Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.
Mercedes EQA is clearly cheaper – starting at 45,900 £ , while the Ford Transit Transporter costs 67,300 £ . That’s a price difference of around 21,435 £.
As for electric range, the Mercedes EQA offers a bit more range – reaching up to 476 km, about 74 km more than the Ford Transit Transporter.
Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.
When it comes to engine power, the Ford Transit Transporter offers somewhat more power – delivering 269 HP compared to 228 HP. That’s roughly 41 HP more horsepower.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Ford Transit Transporter delivers marginally more torque with 430 Nm compared to 390 Nm. That’s about 40 Nm more.
Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.
Seats: Ford Transit Transporter offers more seats – 6 vs 5.
The Mercedes EQA has only a minor advantage in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The Mercedes EQA slips into the electric crossover ranks with the brand’s familiar luxury polish, offering a quiet, fuss-free drive that feels perfectly at home in the city or on a country escape. Inside it’s neatly finished and tech-forward, projecting grown-up refinement even if it plays things a bit safe for anyone chasing outright excitement.
detailsThe Ford Transit is the no-nonsense workhorse that turns heavy-duty hauling into a surprisingly civilized experience, with a cabin that favors practicality over pretense. It’s the go-to for tradespeople and fleet managers who want reliability, adaptability and low running headaches — not showy gimmicks.
detailsCosts and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
45,900 - 54,900 £
|
Price
67,300 - 73,000 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
16.9 kWh/100km
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
476 km
|
Electric Range
341 - 402 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
0 g/km
|
co2
0 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
Cargo Van
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
3 - 6
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
2,115 kg
|
Curb weight
-
|
|
Trunk capacity
340 L
|
Trunk capacity
-
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,834 mm
|
Width
2,059 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
425 kg
|
Payload
-
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
228 HP
|
Power HP
184 - 269 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.7 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
-
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
390 Nm
|
Torque
430 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
|
Power kW
168 kW
|
Power kW
135 - 198 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
-
|
Engine capacity
-
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2025
|
Model Year
2024
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
|
Brand
Mercedes-Benz
|
Brand
Ford
|