Both models have their strengths – but which one suits you more?
Compare performance, efficiency, price and space directly: Mercedes EQA or Renault Scénic?
In the world of electric vehicles, the battle between the Mercedes EQA and Renault Scénic is heating up. Both cars feature modern designs and cutting-edge technology, but they cater to different segments of the auto market. Here, we compare the EQA and Scénic across various technical aspects and innovations to help you decide which one suits your needs better.
The Mercedes EQA comes with several power options, ranging from 190 HP up to an impressive 292 HP. It boasts advanced front-wheel and all-wheel drive configurations, ensuring better handling in various driving conditions. The acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h varies between 6 to 8.6 seconds depending on the model, showcasing the EQA's sporty character.
On the other hand, the Renault Scénic offers power outputs of 170 HP to 220 HP, limited to front-wheel drive. The Scénic's acceleration ranges from 7.9 seconds to 8.6 seconds, making it slightly less performance-oriented compared to the EQA. Both cars utilize a reduction gearbox for seamless power delivery, enhancing the driving experience.
One of the crucial factors in choosing an electric vehicle is its range. The EQA excels here, providing an electric range between 458 km and 561 km, depending on model and battery configuration. The energy consumption ranges from 14.4 to 16.9 kWh/100km, making it an efficient choice for long journeys.
Conversely, the Renault Scénic offers an electric range from 420 km to a remarkable 598 km, though its energy consumption is slightly higher at 16.7 to 17.6 kWh/100km. While both vehicles have impressive ranges, the EQA holds a slight edge in terms of efficiency.
When it comes to interior space, the Renault Scénic takes the lead with a trunk capacity of 545 L, significantly more than the EQA's 340 L. Both cars offer ample seating for five passengers, but the additional cargo space in the Scénic might appeal to families or those needing extra room for luggage.
The dimensions also favor the Scénic, measuring 4470 mm in length and 1864 mm in width, offering a bit more room in the cabin area. The EQA, while still spacious at 4463 mm length and 1834 mm width, aims for a sportier aesthetic which may be slightly more cramped when compared side by side.
Both vehicles showcase significant innovations aimed at enhancing user experience. The Mercedes EQA combines luxury and practicality, featuring advanced infotainment systems and driver-assistance technology, such as lane-keeping assistance and adaptive cruise control. The MBUX system offers a user-friendly interface, which is anything but dull.
The Renault Scénic, on the other hand, focuses on functionality and a family-friendly atmosphere. It offers an innovative Multisense system allowing drivers to customize their driving experience. The infotainment system is intuitive as well, while the inclusion of safety features such as emergency braking and traffic sign recognition boosts its competency as a family vehicle.
When comparing the driving experience, the EQA with its sporty handling and quick acceleration caters well to those who desire performance and responsiveness. It brings a refined and dynamic driving style especially favorable for urban environments and highways alike.
The Scénic provides a more relaxed driving experience, with a focus on comfort and practicality. Its suspension system absorbs road imperfections effectively, making it a pleasant option for longer trips with the family. While it lacks the performance edge of the EQA, it excels in providing a smooth ride.
The choice between the Mercedes EQA and Renault Scénic ultimately depends on your preferences and needs. If you are looking for a dynamic driving experience coupled with luxury and advanced technology, the EQA is an excellent choice. Alternatively, if you require more cargo space and family-oriented features, the Scénic may be the better option. Whichever vehicle you choose, both represent the growing trend towards electric mobility, making them worthy contenders in the evolving automotive landscape.
Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.
Renault Scénic has a clearly perceptible advantage in terms of price – it starts at 34600 £, while the Mercedes EQA costs 44200 £. That’s a price difference of around 9609 £.
In terms of energy consumption, the advantage goes to the Mercedes EQA: with 14.40 kWh per 100 km, it’s somewhat more efficient than the Renault Scénic with 16.60 kWh. That’s a difference of about 2.20 kWh.
As for range, the Renault Scénic performs barely noticeable better – achieving up to 598 km, about 37 km more than the Mercedes EQA.
Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.
When it comes to engine power, the Mercedes EQA has a noticeable edge – offering 292 HP compared to 218 HP. That’s roughly 74 HP more horsepower.
In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Mercedes EQA is evident quicker – completing the sprint in 6 s, while the Renault Scénic takes 7.90 s. That’s about 1.90 s faster.
In terms of top speed, the Renault Scénic performs minimal better – reaching 170 km/h, while the Mercedes EQA tops out at 160 km/h. The difference is around 10 km/h.
There’s also a difference in torque: Mercedes EQA pulls clearly stronger with 520 Nm compared to 300 Nm. That’s about 220 Nm difference.
Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In curb weight, Renault Scénic is to a small extent lighter – 1822 kg compared to 2045 kg. The difference is around 223 kg.
In terms of boot space, the Renault Scénic offers clearly perceptible more room – 545 L compared to 340 L. That’s a difference of about 205 L.
In maximum load capacity, the Renault Scénic performs clearly perceptible better – up to 1670 L, which is about 350 L more than the Mercedes EQA.
When it comes to payload, Renault Scénic slightly takes the win – 518 kg compared to 425 kg. That’s a difference of about 93 kg.
Overall, the Mercedes EQA shows itself to be has a very small edge and secures the title of DriveDuel Champion.
It convinces with the more balanced overall package and proves to be the more versatile choice for everyday use.
@ Mercedes-Benz Group Media
The Mercedes EQA slips into the electric crossover ranks with the brand’s familiar luxury polish, offering a quiet, fuss-free drive that feels perfectly at home in the city or on a country escape. Inside it’s neatly finished and tech-forward, projecting grown-up refinement even if it plays things a bit safe for anyone chasing outright excitement.
details
@ Mercedes-Benz Group Media
@ Mercedes-Benz Group Media
@ Mercedes-Benz Group Media
@ Mercedes-Benz Group Media
The Renault Scénic is a quietly clever family MPV that balances everyday practicality with unexpected flair, offering a roomy, flexible cabin that makes school runs and weekend escapes less of a chore. It won't dazzle like a sports car, but its composed ride, sensible tech and thoughtful storage solutions make it a superbly pragmatic choice for buyers who prefer substance with a wink.
details
@ Renault Group Media
@ Renault Group Media
@ Renault Group Media
@ Renault Group Media
@ Renault Group Media
|
@ Mercedes-Benz Group Media
|
@ Renault Group Media
|
|
|
|
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
44200 - 57400 £
|
Price
34600 - 44000 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
14.4 - 16.9 kWh
|
Consumption kWh/100km
16.6 - 17.5 kWh
|
|
Electric Range
476 - 561 km
|
Electric Range
420 - 598 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
70.50 kWh
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
0 g/km
|
co2
0 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
2045 - 2115 kg
|
Curb weight
1822 - 1927 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
340 L
|
Trunk capacity
545 L
|
|
Length
4463 mm
|
Length
4470 mm
|
|
Width
1834 mm
|
Width
1864 mm
|
|
Height
1608 - 1613 mm
|
Height
1571 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1320 L
|
Max trunk capacity
1670 L
|
|
Payload
425 kg
|
Payload
514 - 518 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
190 - 292 HP
|
Power HP
170 - 218 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6 - 8.6 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.9 - 8.6 s
|
|
Max Speed
160 km/h
|
Max Speed
150 - 170 km/h
|
|
Torque
385 - 520 Nm
|
Torque
280 - 300 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
|
Power kW
140 - 215 kW
|
Power kW
125 - 160 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
-
|
Engine capacity
-
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2024 - 2025
|
Model Year
2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
|
Brand
Mercedes-Benz
|
Brand
Renault
|
Available configurations include Front-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.
The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.
Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Norge
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
España