In the growing electric vehicle market, the Mercedes EQA and smart #3 present two distinct approaches to urban mobility. The EQA offers luxury and performance, catering to drivers seeking sophisticated features and an upscale driving experience, while the smart #3 focuses on compact design and maneuverability for city living. Both models showcase impressive technology, but their contrasting philosophies make them appealing to different segments of eco-conscious consumers.
In the burgeoning world of electric vehicles, the competition is heating up, particularly in the compact SUV segment. The Mercedes EQA and the Smart #3 stand out among the offerings, each representing innovative approaches to the electric vehicle market. In this article, we explore the technical specifications, innovative features, and overall appeal of these two electric SUVs.
Starting with dimensions, the Mercedes EQA measures a solid 4463 mm in length, 1834 mm in width, and up to 1613 mm in height. It presents a robust appearance typical of SUVs from the luxury brand.
In comparison, the Smart #3 is slightly more compact, at 4400 mm long, 1844 mm wide, and with a height of 1556 mm. Both models feature five doors, providing convenient access to their respective interiors, but the EQA offers a more commanding presence on the road due to its larger size.
Looking into their powertrains, the Mercedes EQA offers a range of power options from 190 to 292 HP, with torque peaking at 520 Nm in the most powerful variant. It employs a front or all-wheel drive configuration, with battery capacities ranging from 66.5 kWh to 70.5 kWh. The car boasts an impressive electric range of up to 561 km depending on the variant.
The Smart #3, on the other hand, delivers power from 272 to an exhilarating 428 HP, with torque figures as high as 584 Nm in the top trim. It comes with rear-wheel and all-wheel drive options and features a battery capacity of either 47 kWh or 62 kWh, with a maximum electric range of 455 km.
In terms of acceleration, the Mercedes EQA lags slightly behind its rival, with a 0-100 km/h time ranging from 6 to 8.6 seconds, while the Smart #3 offers a blistering performance, particularly in its high-performance variant, capable of reaching 100 km/h in just 3.7 seconds.
Top speed for the EQA is capped at 160 km/h, while the Smart #3 proves its sportier credentials with a higher maximum speed of 180 km/h. This makes the Smart #3 more appealing for those who prioritize sporty driving dynamics.
When it comes to efficiency, the EQA stands out with a consumption rate ranging from 14.4 to 16.9 kWh/100km, making it one of the more economical choices in its segment. The Smart #3, while slightly less efficient, still offers respectable consumption figures from 16.3 to 17.6 kWh/100km.
The electric range varies significantly between the two, with the EQA achieving up to 561 km versus the Smart #3’s top range of 455 km. This gives the EQA an edge in terms of long-distance travel capabilities.
Inside the cabin, the Mercedes EQA exudes luxury, boasting high-quality materials and cutting-edge technology. With a trunk capacity of 340 L, it offers ample space for luggage and gear. The Smart #3, even with 370 L of trunk space, focuses on a more minimalist and modern design, appealing to urban drivers looking for functionality and style.
Both models come equipped with modern infotainment systems, driver-assistance technologies, and advanced connectivity options, ensuring that drivers stay connected wherever they go. The EQA's array of luxury features may attract buyers looking for a plush experience, while the Smart #3 caters more to a younger, tech-savvy demographic.
In conclusion, both the Mercedes EQA and Smart #3 have their unique strengths and cater to different segments of the electric vehicle market. The EQA is ideal for those who value luxury, range, and a robust driving experience, while the Smart #3 appeals to performance enthusiasts seeking a sportier, more compact SUV. Ultimately, the choice between the two will depend on personal preferences and driving needs, but it’s clear that both are significant players in the ever-evolving electric vehicle landscape.
|
|
|
|
Costs and Consumption |
|
---|---|
Price
about 43500 - 57400
£
|
Price
about 33000 - 43700
£
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
14.4 - 16.9
kWh
|
Consumption kWh/100km
16.3 - 17.6
kWh
|
Electric Range
458 - 561
km
|
Electric Range
325 - 455
km
|
Battery Capacity
66.5 - 70.5
kWh
|
Battery Capacity
47 - 62
kWh
|
co2
0
g/km
|
co2
0
g/km
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
5
|
Curb weight
2045 - 2115
kg
|
Curb weight
1780 - 1910
kg
|
Trunk capacity
340
L
|
Trunk capacity
370
L
|
Length
4463
mm
|
Length
4400
mm
|
Width
1834
mm
|
Width
1844
mm
|
Height
1608 - 1613
mm
|
Height
1556
mm
|
Payload
425
kg
|
Payload
419 - 450
kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Power HP
190 - 292
HP
|
Power HP
272 - 428
HP
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6 - 8.6
s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
3.7 - 5.8
s
|
Max Speed
160
km/h
|
Max Speed
180
km/h
|
Torque
385 - 520
Nm
|
Torque
343 - 584
Nm
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
Power kW
140 - 215
kW
|
Power kW
200 - 315
kW
|
Engine capacity
-
|
Engine capacity
-
|
Top speed
160
km/h
|
Top speed
180
km/h
|
General |
|
Model Year
2024 - 2025
|
Model Year
2023
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
Brand
Mercedes-Benz
|
Brand
smart
|
The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.