Compare performance (228 HP vs 272 HP), boot space and price (45,900 £ vs 42,000 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mercedes EQA or smart #3?
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
In the burgeoning world of electric vehicles, the competition is heating up, particularly in the compact SUV segment. The Mercedes EQA and the Smart #3 stand out among the offerings, each representing innovative approaches to the electric vehicle market. In this article, we explore the technical specifications, innovative features, and overall appeal of these two electric SUVs.
Starting with dimensions, the Mercedes EQA measures a solid 4463 mm in length, 1834 mm in width, and up to 1613 mm in height. It presents a robust appearance typical of SUVs from the luxury brand.
In comparison, the Smart #3 is slightly more compact, at 4400 mm long, 1844 mm wide, and with a height of 1556 mm. Both models feature five doors, providing convenient access to their respective interiors, but the EQA offers a more commanding presence on the road due to its larger size.
Looking into their powertrains, the Mercedes EQA offers a range of power options from 190 to 292 HP, with torque peaking at 520 Nm in the most powerful variant. It employs a front or all-wheel drive configuration, with battery capacities ranging from 66.5 kWh to 70.5 kWh. The car boasts an impressive electric range of up to 561 km depending on the variant.
The Smart #3, on the other hand, delivers power from 272 to an exhilarating 428 HP, with torque figures as high as 584 Nm in the top trim. It comes with rear-wheel and all-wheel drive options and features a battery capacity of either 47 kWh or 62 kWh, with a maximum electric range of 455 km.
In terms of acceleration, the Mercedes EQA lags slightly behind its rival, with a 0-100 km/h time ranging from 6 to 8.6 seconds, while the Smart #3 offers a blistering performance, particularly in its high-performance variant, capable of reaching 100 km/h in just 3.7 seconds.
Top speed for the EQA is capped at 160 km/h, while the Smart #3 proves its sportier credentials with a higher maximum speed of 180 km/h. This makes the Smart #3 more appealing for those who prioritize sporty driving dynamics.
When it comes to efficiency, the EQA stands out with a consumption rate ranging from 14.4 to 16.9 kWh/100km, making it one of the more economical choices in its segment. The Smart #3, while slightly less efficient, still offers respectable consumption figures from 16.3 to 17.6 kWh/100km.
The electric range varies significantly between the two, with the EQA achieving up to 561 km versus the Smart #3’s top range of 455 km. This gives the EQA an edge in terms of long-distance travel capabilities.
Inside the cabin, the Mercedes EQA exudes luxury, boasting high-quality materials and cutting-edge technology. With a trunk capacity of 340 L, it offers ample space for luggage and gear. The Smart #3, even with 370 L of trunk space, focuses on a more minimalist and modern design, appealing to urban drivers looking for functionality and style.
Both models come equipped with modern infotainment systems, driver-assistance technologies, and advanced connectivity options, ensuring that drivers stay connected wherever they go. The EQA's array of luxury features may attract buyers looking for a plush experience, while the Smart #3 caters more to a younger, tech-savvy demographic.
In conclusion, both the Mercedes EQA and Smart #3 have their unique strengths and cater to different segments of the electric vehicle market. The EQA is ideal for those who value luxury, range, and a robust driving experience, while the Smart #3 appeals to performance enthusiasts seeking a sportier, more compact SUV. Ultimately, the choice between the two will depend on personal preferences and driving needs, but it’s clear that both are significant players in the ever-evolving electric vehicle landscape.
Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.
smart #3 is only slightly cheaper – starting at 42,000 £ , while the Mercedes EQA costs 45,900 £ . That’s a price difference of around 3,883 £.
In terms of energy consumption, the smart #3 is only slightly more efficient: consuming 16.3 kWh/100km compared to 16.9 kWh/100km for the Mercedes EQA. That’s a difference of about 0.6 kWh/100km.
As for electric range, the Mercedes EQA offers marginally more range – reaching up to 476 km, about 21 km more than the smart #3.
Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.
When it comes to engine power, the smart #3 offers somewhat more power – delivering 272 HP compared to 228 HP. That’s roughly 44 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the smart #3 is clearly quicker – completing the sprint in 5.8 s, while the Mercedes EQA takes 7.7 s. That’s about 1.9 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Mercedes EQA delivers marginally more torque with 390 Nm compared to 384 Nm. That’s about 6 Nm more.
Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, smart #3 is moderately lighter – 1,810 kg compared to 2,115 kg. The difference is around 305 kg.
Looking at boot space, the smart #3 offers only slightly more boot space – 370 L compared to 340 L. That’s a difference of about 30 L.
When it comes to payload, the smart #3 carries marginally more – 450 kg compared to 425 kg. That’s a difference of about 25 kg.
The smart #3 is far ahead overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The Mercedes EQA slips into the electric crossover ranks with the brand’s familiar luxury polish, offering a quiet, fuss-free drive that feels perfectly at home in the city or on a country escape. Inside it’s neatly finished and tech-forward, projecting grown-up refinement even if it plays things a bit safe for anyone chasing outright excitement.
details
The Smart #3 turns the brand's cheeky city-car attitude into a grown-up compact SUV, pairing sleek styling with a surprisingly roomy, well-made interior. It's a brilliant pick for buyers who want electric ease without dullness — practical enough for daily life, but still lively enough to make parking and grocery runs feel a little fun.
details
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
45,900 - 54,900 £
|
Price
42,000 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
16.9 kWh/100km
|
Consumption kWh/100km
16.3 kWh/100km
|
|
Electric Range
476 km
|
Electric Range
455 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
0 g/km
|
co2
0 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
2,115 kg
|
Curb weight
1,810 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
340 L
|
Trunk capacity
370 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,834 mm
|
Width
1,844 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
425 kg
|
Payload
450 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
228 HP
|
Power HP
272 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.7 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.8 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
390 Nm
|
Torque
384 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
|
Power kW
168 kW
|
Power kW
200 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
-
|
Engine capacity
-
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2025
|
Model Year
2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
|
Brand
Mercedes-Benz
|
Brand
smart
|
Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
España