Compare performance (122 HP vs 130 HP), boot space and price (27,800 £ vs 25,700 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mercedes EQT or Renault Kangoo?
When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.
Renault Kangoo is marginally cheaper – starting at 25,700 £ , while the Mercedes EQT costs 27,800 £ . That’s a price difference of around 2,060 £.
In terms of energy consumption, the Mercedes EQT is very slightly more efficient: consuming 19.5 kWh/100km compared to 20.2 kWh/100km for the Renault Kangoo. That’s a difference of about 0.7 kWh/100km.
As for electric range, the Renault Kangoo offers barely more range – reaching up to 285 km, about 7 km more than the Mercedes EQT.
Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.
When it comes to engine power, the Renault Kangoo offers very slightly more power – delivering 130 HP compared to 122 HP. That’s roughly 8 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Renault Kangoo is only slightly quicker – completing the sprint in 11.6 s, while the Mercedes EQT takes 12.6 s. That’s about 1 s quicker.
Looking at top speed, the Renault Kangoo is only slightly faster – reaching 135 km/h, while the Mercedes EQT tops out at 132 km/h. The difference is around 3 km/h.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Renault Kangoo delivers marginally more torque with 270 Nm compared to 245 Nm. That’s about 25 Nm more.
Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.
Seats: Renault Kangoo offers more seats – 7 vs 5.
In terms of curb weight, Renault Kangoo is clearly lighter – 1,489 kg compared to 1,925 kg. The difference is around 436 kg.
Looking at boot space, the Renault Kangoo offers significantly more boot space – 950 L compared to 551 L. That’s a difference of about 399 L.
For maximum load capacity, the Renault Kangoo offers noticeably more capacity – up to 3,050 L, about 1,071 L more than the Mercedes EQT.
When it comes to payload, the Renault Kangoo carries slightly more – 610 kg compared to 531 kg. That’s a difference of about 79 kg.
The Renault Kangoo stands well ahead of its rival in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The Mercedes EQT is Mercedes‑Benz’s compact electric people carrier that grafts the brand’s usual refinement onto a practical, family‑friendly van body. It makes school runs feel a little more upscale — quietly electric, sensibly packaged and unexpectedly pleasant to live with, especially if you like your practicality with a touch of luxury.
detailsThe Renault Kangoo is the pragmatic chameleon of small vans, marrying van-like practicality with carlike comfort and a cheerful, friendly face that suits both family runs and workday hauls. It's sensible, versatile and annoyingly useful — easy to live with, cheap to run and clever where it counts, so you get more space and fewer compromises than the price suggests.
detailsCosts and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
27,800 - 32,100 £
|
Price
25,700 - 36,200 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
Consumption L/100km
5.2 - 7.4 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
19.5 - 20.8 kWh/100km
|
Consumption kWh/100km
20.2 - 21.5 kWh/100km
|
|
Electric Range
265 - 278 km
|
Electric Range
278 - 285 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
45 kWh
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
0 g/km
|
co2
0 - 168 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
High Roof Estate
|
Body Type
High Roof Estate
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5 - 7
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
1,925 - 2,023 kg
|
Curb weight
1,489 - 2,041 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
242 - 551 L
|
Trunk capacity
500 - 950 L
|
|
Length
4,498 - 4,922 mm
|
Length
4,486 - 4,911 mm
|
|
Width
1,859 mm
|
Width
1,860 - 1,919 mm
|
|
Height
1,819 - 1,830 mm
|
Height
1,838 - 1,869 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1,979 L
|
Max trunk capacity
2,500 - 3,050 L
|
|
Payload
457 - 531 kg
|
Payload
459 - 610 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
Engine Type
Electric, Petrol, Diesel
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
|
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox, Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
122 HP
|
Power HP
95 - 130 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
12.6 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
11.6 - 16.7 s
|
|
Max Speed
132 km/h
|
Max Speed
130 - 135 km/h
|
|
Torque
245 Nm
|
Torque
240 - 270 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
|
Power kW
90 kW
|
Power kW
70 - 96 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
-
|
Engine capacity
1,332 - 1,461 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2,023 - 2,024
|
Model Year
2,022 - 2,025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A, F, E
|
|
Brand
Mercedes-Benz
|
Brand
Renault
|