Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
EspañaVS
Mercedes EQT vs Renault Kangoo - Differences and prices compared
Compare performance (122 HP vs 130 HP), boot space and price (27800 £ vs 25700 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mercedes EQT or Renault Kangoo?
EQT
Costs and Efficiency:
Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.
Renault Kangoo has a minimal advantage in terms of price – it starts at 25700 £ , while the Mercedes EQT costs 27800 £ . That’s a price difference of around 2060 £.
In terms of energy consumption, the advantage goes to the Mercedes EQT: with 19.50 kWh per 100 km, it’s barely noticeable more efficient than the Renault Kangoo with 20.20 kWh. That’s a difference of about 0.70 kWh.
As for electric range, the Renault Kangoo performs barely noticeable better – achieving up to 285 km, about 7 km more than the Mercedes EQT.
Kangoo
Engine and Performance:
Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.
When it comes to engine power, the Renault Kangoo has a minimal edge – offering 130 HP compared to 122 HP. That’s roughly 8 HP more horsepower.
In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Renault Kangoo is slight quicker – completing the sprint in 11.60 s, while the Mercedes EQT takes 12.60 s. That’s about 1 s faster.
In terms of top speed, the Renault Kangoo performs minimal better – reaching 135 km/h, while the Mercedes EQT tops out at 132 km/h. The difference is around 3 km/h.
There’s also a difference in torque: Renault Kangoo pulls slight stronger with 270 Nm compared to 245 Nm. That’s about 25 Nm difference.
EQT
Space and Everyday Use:
Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.
Seats: Renault Kangoo offers clearly perceptible more seating capacity – 7 vs 5.
In curb weight, Renault Kangoo is clearly perceptible lighter – 1489 kg compared to 1925 kg. The difference is around 436 kg.
In terms of boot space, the Renault Kangoo offers significantly more room – 950 L compared to 551 L. That’s a difference of about 399 L.
In maximum load capacity, the Renault Kangoo performs distinct better – up to 3050 L, which is about 1071 L more than the Mercedes EQT.
When it comes to payload, Renault Kangoo slightly takes the win – 610 kg compared to 531 kg. That’s a difference of about 79 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The Renault Kangoo is far ahead overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
Mercedes EQT
Renault Kangoo
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
from about £25,700
Renault Kangoo
Mercedes EQT
The Mercedes EQT is Mercedes‑Benz’s compact electric people carrier that grafts the brand’s usual refinement onto a practical, family‑friendly van body. It makes school runs feel a little more upscale — quietly electric, sensibly packaged and unexpectedly pleasant to live with, especially if you like your practicality with a touch of luxury.
details
Renault Kangoo
The Renault Kangoo is the pragmatic chameleon of small vans, marrying van-like practicality with carlike comfort and a cheerful, friendly face that suits both family runs and workday hauls. It's sensible, versatile and annoyingly useful — easy to live with, cheap to run and clever where it counts, so you get more space and fewer compromises than the price suggests.
details
Mercedes EQT
Renault Kangoo
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
27800 - 32100 £
|
Price
25700 - 36200 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
Consumption L/100km
5.2 - 7.4 L
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
19.5 - 20.8 kWh
|
Consumption kWh/100km
20.2 - 21.5 kWh
|
|
Electric Range
265 - 278 km
|
Electric Range
278 - 285 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
45 kWh
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
0 g/km
|
co2
0 - 168 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
High Roof Estate
|
Body Type
High Roof Estate
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5 - 7
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
1925 - 2023 kg
|
Curb weight
1489 - 2041 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
242 - 551 L
|
Trunk capacity
500 - 950 L
|
|
Length
4498 - 4922 mm
|
Length
4486 - 4911 mm
|
|
Width
1859 mm
|
Width
1860 - 1919 mm
|
|
Height
1819 - 1830 mm
|
Height
1838 - 1869 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1979 L
|
Max trunk capacity
2500 - 3050 L
|
|
Payload
457 - 531 kg
|
Payload
459 - 610 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
Engine Type
Electric, Petrol, Diesel
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
|
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox, Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
122 HP
|
Power HP
95 - 130 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
12.60 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
11.6 - 16.7 s
|
|
Max Speed
132 km/h
|
Max Speed
130 - 135 km/h
|
|
Torque
245 Nm
|
Torque
240 - 270 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
|
Power kW
90 kW
|
Power kW
70 - 96 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
-
|
Engine capacity
1332 - 1461 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2023 - 2024
|
Model Year
2022 - 2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A, F, E
|
|
Brand
Mercedes-Benz
|
Brand
Renault
|
What drivetrain options does the Mercedes EQT have?
Available configurations include Front-Wheel Drive.
The prices shown are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted for local VAT. Local registration taxes (e.g. NoVA, BPM or CO2 malus) are not included. This information is not legally binding.