VS

Mercedes EQT vs Volvo EX90 comparison

Compare performance (122 HP vs 680 HP), boot space and price (27,800 £ vs 72,200 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mercedes EQT or Volvo EX90?

Mercedes EQT vs Volvo EX90: Key differences

Mercedes EQT

5 (1 Reviews)
rate
  • significantly cheaper
  • visibly lighter
details

Volvo EX90

2.6 (1 Reviews)
rate
  • clearly more power
  • very slightly more efficient
  • significantly more electric range
  • substantially quicker 0–100 km/h
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

EQT

Costs and Efficiency:

Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.

Mercedes EQT is significantly cheaper – starting at 27,800 £ , while the Volvo EX90 costs 72,200 £ . That’s a price difference of around 44,388 £.

In terms of energy consumption, the Volvo EX90 is very slightly more efficient: consuming 17.8 kWh/100km compared to 19.5 kWh/100km for the Mercedes EQT. That’s a difference of about 1.7 kWh/100km.

As for electric range, the Volvo EX90 offers significantly more range – reaching up to 620 km, about 342 km more than the Mercedes EQT.

EX90

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the Volvo EX90 offers clearly more power – delivering 680 HP compared to 122 HP. That’s roughly 558 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Volvo EX90 is substantially quicker – completing the sprint in 4.2 s, while the Mercedes EQT takes 12.6 s. That’s about 8.4 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Volvo EX90 delivers considerably more torque with 870 Nm compared to 245 Nm. That’s about 625 Nm more.

EQT

Space and Everyday Use:

Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?

Seats: Volvo EX90 offers more seats – 7 vs 5.

In terms of curb weight, Mercedes EQT is visibly lighter – 1,925 kg compared to 2,555 kg. The difference is around 630 kg.

When it comes to payload, the Volvo EX90 carries moderately more – 605 kg compared to 531 kg. That’s a difference of about 74 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Volvo EX90 is decisively ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £72,200
EX90

Volvo EX90

  • Engine Type Electric
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 333 - 680 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km 17.8 - 19.3 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range 570 - 620 km
Mercedes EQT
Volvo EX90

Costs and Consumption

View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance

View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body

View detailed analysis

Mercedes EQT

The Mercedes EQT is Mercedes‑Benz’s compact electric people carrier that grafts the brand’s usual refinement onto a practical, family‑friendly van body. It makes school runs feel a little more upscale — quietly electric, sensibly packaged and unexpectedly pleasant to live with, especially if you like your practicality with a touch of luxury.

details

Volvo EX90

The Volvo EX90 feels like a Scandinavian fortress on wheels, combining serene luxury with smart safety features that make everyday driving remarkably calm and confident. It dresses cutting-edge electric technology in understated elegance, so buyers who want peace of mind without shouting about it will find it hard to resist.

details
Mercedes EQT
Volvo EX90

Costs and Consumption

Price
27,800 - 32,100 £
Price
72,200 - 91,700 £
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
19.5 - 20.8 kWh/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
17.8 - 19.3 kWh/100km
Electric Range
265 - 278 km
Electric Range
570 - 620 km
Battery Capacity
45 kWh
Battery Capacity
-
co2
0 g/km
co2
0 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body

Body Type
High Roof Estate
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
6 - 7
Doors
5
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,925 - 2,023 kg
Curb weight
2,555 - 2,765 kg
Trunk capacity
242 - 551 L
Trunk capacity
-
Length
4,498 - 4,922 mm
Length
-
Width
1,859 mm
Width
1,964 mm
Height
1,819 - 1,830 mm
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
1,979 L
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
457 - 531 kg
Payload
545 - 605 kg

Engine and Performance

Engine Type
Electric
Engine Type
Electric
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
122 HP
Power HP
333 - 680 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
12.6 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.2 - 6.8 s
Max Speed
132 km/h
Max Speed
-
Torque
245 Nm
Torque
480 - 870 Nm
Number of Cylinders
-
Number of Cylinders
-
Power kW
90 kW
Power kW
245 - 500 kW
Engine capacity
-
Engine capacity
-

General

Model Year
2,023 - 2,024
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
Brand
Mercedes-Benz
Brand
Volvo
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.