Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Norge
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
EspañaVS
Audi Q6 e-tron vs Volvo EX90 - Differences and prices compared
Compare performance (490 HP vs 680 HP), boot space and price (54400 £ vs 73700 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Audi Q6 e-tron or Volvo EX90?
Q6 e-tron
Costs and Efficiency:
Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.
Audi Q6 e-tron has a distinct advantage in terms of price – it starts at 54400 £ , while the Volvo EX90 costs 73700 £ . That’s a price difference of around 19277 £.
In terms of energy consumption, the advantage goes to the Audi Q6 e-tron: with 15.60 kWh per 100 km, it’s somewhat more efficient than the Volvo EX90 with 17.80 kWh. That’s a difference of about 2.20 kWh.
As for electric range, the Audi Q6 e-tron performs slight better – achieving up to 656 km, about 36 km more than the Volvo EX90.
EX90
Engine and Performance:
Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.
When it comes to engine power, the Volvo EX90 has a distinct edge – offering 680 HP compared to 490 HP. That’s roughly 190 HP more horsepower.
In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Volvo EX90 is hardly perceptible quicker – completing the sprint in 4.20 s, while the Audi Q6 e-tron takes 4.40 s. That’s about 0.20 s faster.
In terms of top speed, the Audi Q6 e-tron performs distinct better – reaching 230 km/h, while the Volvo EX90 tops out at 180 km/h. The difference is around 50 km/h.
There’s also a difference in torque: Volvo EX90 pulls minimal stronger with 870 Nm compared to 855 Nm. That’s about 15 Nm difference.
Ad · Affiliate
As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
Q6 e-tron
Space and Everyday Use:
Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?
Seats: Volvo EX90 offers evident more seating capacity – 7 vs 5.
In curb weight, Audi Q6 e-tron is a bit lighter – 2200 kg compared to 2556 kg. The difference is around 356 kg.
In terms of boot space, the Audi Q6 e-tron offers distinct more room – 526 L compared to 324 L. That’s a difference of about 202 L.
In maximum load capacity, the Volvo EX90 performs clearly perceptible better – up to 2135 L, which is about 606 L more than the Audi Q6 e-tron.
When it comes to payload, Volvo EX90 slight takes the win – 585 kg compared to 540 kg. That’s a difference of about 45 kg.
Who comes out on top?
Overall, the Volvo EX90 shows itself to be barely ahead and secures the title of DriveDuel Champion.
It convinces with the more balanced overall package and proves to be the more versatile choice for everyday use.
from about £73,700
Volvo EX90
Audi Q6 e-tron
Volvo EX90
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Audi Q6 e-tron
5 (2 Reviews)
The Audi Q6 e-tron balances sleek, coupe-like styling with a roomy, upscale interior that feels modern without being showy. It delivers refined electric performance and smart tech that make daily driving effortless — the sort of EV that might make petrolheads grudgingly admit they fancy the future.
details
Volvo EX90
The Volvo EX90 feels like a Scandinavian fortress on wheels, combining serene luxury with smart safety features that make everyday driving remarkably calm and confident. It dresses cutting-edge electric technology in understated elegance, so buyers who want peace of mind without shouting about it will find it hard to resist.
details
Audi Q6 e-tron
Volvo EX90
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
54400 - 91900 £
|
Price
73700 - 94100 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
15.6 - 18.9 kWh
|
Consumption kWh/100km
17.8 - 19.3 kWh
|
|
Electric Range
482 - 656 km
|
Electric Range
570 - 620 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
75.8 - 94.9 kWh
|
Battery Capacity
88 - 102 kWh
|
|
co2
0 g/km
|
co2
0 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
6 - 7
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
2200 - 2425 kg
|
Curb weight
2556 - 2764 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
499 - 526 L
|
Trunk capacity
324 L
|
|
Length
4771 mm
|
Length
5037 mm
|
|
Width
1939 - 1965 mm
|
Width
1964 mm
|
|
Height
1665 - 1685 mm
|
Height
1744 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1361 - 1529 L
|
Max trunk capacity
2082 - 2135 L
|
|
Payload
540 kg
|
Payload
375 - 585 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
252 - 490 HP
|
Power HP
333 - 680 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.4 - 7.6 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.2 - 6.8 s
|
|
Max Speed
210 - 230 km/h
|
Max Speed
180 km/h
|
|
Torque
450 - 855 Nm
|
Torque
480 - 870 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
|
Power kW
185 - 360 kW
|
Power kW
245 - 500 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
-
|
Engine capacity
-
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2024 - 2025
|
Model Year
2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
|
Brand
Audi
|
Brand
Volvo
|
What drivetrain options does the Audi Q6 e-tron have?
Available configurations include Rear-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.
The prices shown are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted for local VAT. Local registration taxes (e.g. NoVA, BPM or CO2 malus) are not included. This information is not legally binding.