Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Norge
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
EspañaVS
Audi Q6 e-tron vs Skoda Enyaq - Differences and prices compared
Compare performance (490 HP vs 340 HP), boot space and price (54400 £ vs 38100 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Audi Q6 e-tron or Skoda Enyaq?
Q6 e-tron
Costs and Efficiency:
Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.
Skoda Enyaq has a decisively advantage in terms of price – it starts at 38100 £ , while the Audi Q6 e-tron costs 54400 £ . That’s a price difference of around 16371 £.
In terms of energy consumption, the advantage goes to the Skoda Enyaq: with 14.80 kWh per 100 km, it’s slight more efficient than the Audi Q6 e-tron with 15.60 kWh. That’s a difference of about 0.80 kWh.
As for electric range, the Audi Q6 e-tron performs somewhat better – achieving up to 656 km, about 69 km more than the Skoda Enyaq.
Enyaq
Engine and Performance:
Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.
When it comes to engine power, the Audi Q6 e-tron has a clearly perceptible edge – offering 490 HP compared to 340 HP. That’s roughly 150 HP more horsepower.
In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Audi Q6 e-tron is clearly perceptible quicker – completing the sprint in 4.40 s, while the Skoda Enyaq takes 5.40 s. That’s about 1 s faster.
In terms of top speed, the Audi Q6 e-tron performs noticeable better – reaching 230 km/h, while the Skoda Enyaq tops out at 180 km/h. The difference is around 50 km/h.
There’s also a difference in torque: Audi Q6 e-tron pulls evident stronger with 855 Nm compared to 679 Nm. That’s about 176 Nm difference.
Ad · Affiliate
As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
Q6 e-tron
Space and Everyday Use:
Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In curb weight, Skoda Enyaq is minimal lighter – 2002 kg compared to 2200 kg. The difference is around 198 kg.
In terms of boot space, the Skoda Enyaq offers somewhat more room – 585 L compared to 526 L. That’s a difference of about 59 L.
In maximum load capacity, the Skoda Enyaq performs a bit better – up to 1710 L, which is about 181 L more than the Audi Q6 e-tron.
When it comes to payload, Audi Q6 e-tron slight takes the win – 540 kg compared to 509 kg. That’s a difference of about 31 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The Audi Q6 e-tron is decisively ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
Audi Q6 e-tron
Skoda Enyaq
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
from about £54,400
Audi Q6 e-tron
Audi Q6 e-tron
5 (2 Reviews)
The Audi Q6 e-tron balances sleek, coupe-like styling with a roomy, upscale interior that feels modern without being showy. It delivers refined electric performance and smart tech that make daily driving effortless — the sort of EV that might make petrolheads grudgingly admit they fancy the future.
details
Skoda Enyaq
5 (3 Reviews)
The Skoda Enyaq is a cleverly packaged electric SUV that blends roomy, pragmatic family space with clean, Czech design and sensible value. On the road it’s unshowy but composed, offering serene electric performance and easy-to-use tech — the kind of car that makes daily life smoother without trying too hard.
details
Audi Q6 e-tron
Skoda Enyaq
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
54400 - 91900 £
|
Price
38100 - 52200 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
15.6 - 18.9 kWh
|
Consumption kWh/100km
14.8 - 16.2 kWh
|
|
Electric Range
482 - 656 km
|
Electric Range
428 - 587 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
75.8 - 94.9 kWh
|
Battery Capacity
59 - 77 kWh
|
|
co2
0 g/km
|
co2
0 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
2200 - 2425 kg
|
Curb weight
2002 - 2293 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
499 - 526 L
|
Trunk capacity
570 - 585 L
|
|
Length
4771 mm
|
Length
4658 mm
|
|
Width
1939 - 1965 mm
|
Width
1879 mm
|
|
Height
1665 - 1685 mm
|
Height
1605 - 1625 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1361 - 1529 L
|
Max trunk capacity
1610 - 1710 L
|
|
Payload
540 kg
|
Payload
457 - 509 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
252 - 490 HP
|
Power HP
204 - 340 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.4 - 7.6 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.4 - 8.1 s
|
|
Max Speed
210 - 230 km/h
|
Max Speed
160 - 180 km/h
|
|
Torque
450 - 855 Nm
|
Torque
310 - 679 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
|
Power kW
185 - 360 kW
|
Power kW
150 - 250 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
-
|
Engine capacity
-
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2024 - 2025
|
Model Year
2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
|
Brand
Audi
|
Brand
Skoda
|
What drivetrain options does the Audi Q6 e-tron have?
Available configurations include Rear-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.
The prices shown are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted for local VAT. Local registration taxes (e.g. NoVA, BPM or CO2 malus) are not included. This information is not legally binding.