Compare performance (131 HP vs 130 HP), boot space and price (23,000 £ vs 22,900 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mercedes T Class or Peugeot Rifter?
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
In the world of high roof wagons, two models stand out for their reliability, performance, and innovation: the Mercedes T-Klasse and the Peugeot Rifter. Both belong to a segment that emphasizes practicality and versatility, appealing to families and businesses alike. In this article, we dissect the technical aspects and innovations that set these two contenders apart.
The Mercedes T-Klasse comes with both diesel and petrol engine options, while the Peugeot Rifter offers petrol, diesel, and an all-electric variant. The T-Klasse engine options range from 95 to 131 HP, providing adequate power for everyday driving. Conversely, the Rifter’s power output ranges from 102 to 136 HP, with the electric model delivering the highest horsepower.
For acceleration, the Rifter leads slightly with a 0-100 km/h time as low as 10.8 seconds for some models, compared to the T-Klasse’s best time of 11.6 seconds. The choice between electric and conventional powertrains, particularly for the Rifter, offers consumers more flexibility depending on their driving needs.
Both models feature front-wheel-drive capabilities, which are standard in this segment for enhanced fuel efficiency and handling. The Mercedes T-Klasse offers a choice between manual and dual-clutch automatic transmissions, catering to both traditional and modern driving preferences. The Peugeot Rifter matches this with its manual and automatic gearbox options, including a specialized reduction gearbox for their electric model.
The T-Klasse measures up to 4,922 mm in length, offering a generous cabin space, which is slightly longer than the Rifter’s longest measurement of 4,755 mm. Both models accommodate five passengers comfortably, although the Rifter also provides 7-seat configurations for larger families or those needing extra space.
Trunk capacity is another key differentiator. The T-Klasse offers a commendable 520 liters, whereas the Rifter boasts up to 1,050 liters, providing superior cargo-carrying abilities — a notable advantage for those who prioritize storage.
When it comes to sustainability, the Peugeot Rifter takes a progressive leap with its electric variant that provides a range of up to 340 km. This model aligns with the current shift towards low-emission vehicles, showcasing Peugeot’s commitment to sustainability. In contrast, the T-Klasse continues to provide respectable CO2 efficiency but cannot yet offer a zero-emissions option.
Fuel consumption for both models remains competitive, with the T-Klasse providing a diesel consumption starting at 5.1 L/100km, while the Rifter ranges from 5.4 to 6.9 L/100km depending on the engine choice.
Both the Mercedes T-Klasse and Peugeot Rifter provide robust options in the high roof wagon category, balancing performance, efficiency, and comfort. The choice between these two could boil down to personal preferences — whether it's the flexibility and innovation of the Rifter’s electric model, or the steady performance and sophistication associated with the T-Klasse.
Ultimately, both models showcase the strides made in automotive technology and design, making them worthy considerations for anyone looking for a reliable high roof wagon.
Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.
Peugeot Rifter is very slightly cheaper – starting at 22,900 £ , while the Mercedes T Class costs 23,000 £ . That’s a price difference of around 107 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Mercedes T Class uses 5.1 L/100km and is very slightly more efficient than the Peugeot Rifter with 5.4 L/100km. The difference is about 0.3 L/100km.
Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.
When it comes to engine power, the Mercedes T Class offers very slightly more power – delivering 131 HP compared to 130 HP. That’s roughly 1 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Peugeot Rifter is very slightly quicker – completing the sprint in 11.3 s, while the Mercedes T Class takes 11.6 s. That’s about 0.3 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Peugeot Rifter delivers only slightly more torque with 300 Nm compared to 270 Nm. That’s about 30 Nm more.
Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.
Seats: Peugeot Rifter offers more seats – 7 vs 5.
In terms of curb weight, Peugeot Rifter is marginally lighter – 1,498 kg compared to 1,556 kg. The difference is around 58 kg.
When it comes to payload, the Peugeot Rifter carries markedly more – 814 kg compared to 630 kg. That’s a difference of about 184 kg.
The Peugeot Rifter leads convincingly in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The Mercedes T-Class dresses everyday practicality in a premium suit, blending the sensible utility of a small van with the refinement you expect from the three-pointed star. Its flexible interior and clever details make it a brilliantly pragmatic choice for families and active owners who want comfort and usefulness without the fuss.
details
The Peugeot Rifter is a practical, family-friendly people carrier that makes everyday errands and weekend escapes feel effortless thanks to its airy cabin and clever, flexible interior. With chunky, purposeful styling and storage solutions everywhere, the Rifter manages to be both unashamedly useful and unexpectedly likeable.
details
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
23,000 - 30,500 £
|
Price
22,900 - 30,100 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
5.1 - 7.4 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
5.4 - 6.5 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
-
|
Electric Range
-
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
135 - 167 g/km
|
co2
142 - 157 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
High Roof Estate
|
Body Type
High Roof Estate
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5 - 7
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
1,556 - 1,678 kg
|
Curb weight
1,498 - 1,694 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
-
|
Trunk capacity
-
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,859 mm
|
Width
1,848 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
521 - 630 kg
|
Payload
518 - 814 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Petrol, Diesel
|
Engine Type
Petrol, Diesel
|
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
95 - 131 HP
|
Power HP
102 - 130 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
11.6 - 15.1 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
11.3 - 13.5 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
200 - 270 Nm
|
Torque
205 - 300 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
|
|
Power kW
70 - 96 kW
|
Power kW
75 - 96 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1,332 - 1,461 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1,199 - 1,499 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2025
|
Model Year
2026
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
F, D, E
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, F
|
|
Brand
Mercedes-Benz
|
Brand
Peugeot
|
Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
Česko
España