Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Norge
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
EspañaVS
Mercedes Vito Transporter vs Toyota RAV4 - Differences and prices compared
Compare performance (237 HP vs 306 HP), boot space and price (28800 £ vs 35100 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mercedes Vito Transporter or Toyota RAV4?
Vito Transporter
Costs and Efficiency:
Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.
Mercedes Vito Transporter has a distinct advantage in terms of price – it starts at 28800 £ , while the Toyota RAV4 costs 35100 £ . That’s a price difference of around 6352 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Toyota RAV4 manages with 1 L and is therefore convincingly more efficient than the Mercedes Vito Transporter with 6.80 L. The difference is about 5.80 L per 100 km.
As for electric range, the Mercedes Vito Transporter performs clearly better – achieving up to 474 km, about 399 km more than the Toyota RAV4.
RAV4
Engine and Performance:
Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.
When it comes to engine power, the Toyota RAV4 has a noticeable edge – offering 306 HP compared to 237 HP. That’s roughly 69 HP more horsepower.
In terms of top speed, the Toyota RAV4 performs distinct better – reaching 180 km/h, while the Mercedes Vito Transporter tops out at 140 km/h. The difference is around 40 km/h.
Ad · Affiliate
As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
Space and Everyday Use:
Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In curb weight, Toyota RAV4 is minimal lighter – 1745 kg compared to 1916 kg. The difference is around 171 kg.
In maximum load capacity, the Mercedes Vito Transporter performs clearly better – up to 6600 L, which is about 4910 L more than the Toyota RAV4.
When it comes to payload, Mercedes Vito Transporter clearly perceptible takes the win – 884 kg compared to 600 kg. That’s a difference of about 284 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The Toyota RAV4 is decisively ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
Mercedes Vito Transporter
Toyota RAV4
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
from about £35,100
Toyota RAV4
Mercedes Vito Transporter
The Mercedes Vito Transporter is a supremely practical workhorse that blends Mercedes refinement with van-like utility, making long days on the road feel surprisingly civilized. With a cleverly thought-out interior and a drive that won’t wear you out, the Vito is the ideal choice for businesses that want capability without sacrificing comfort — and yes, it still looks sharper than most vans at a client meeting.
details
Toyota RAV4
4.7 (3 Reviews)
The Toyota RAV4 feels like a sensible friend on the road, marrying dependable practicality with a dash of SUV personality that keeps daily driving from turning dull. Comfortable and easy to live with, it looks tough without shouting and quietly gets the job done — a sensible pick for buyers who want versatility without drama.
details
Mercedes Vito Transporter
Toyota RAV4
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
28800 - 51600 £
|
Price
35100 - 55700 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
6.8 - 9.7 L
|
Consumption L/100km
1 - 5.6 L
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
21.2 - 26.5 kWh
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
304 - 474 km
|
Electric Range
75 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
60 - 90 kWh
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
0 - 222 g/km
|
co2
22 - 128 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
57 - 70 L
|
Fuel tank capacity
55 L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
Cargo Van
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
2 - 5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
4
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
1916 - 2518 kg
|
Curb weight
1745 - 1910 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
-
|
Trunk capacity
520 - 580 L
|
|
Length
4895 - 5390 mm
|
Length
4600 mm
|
|
Width
1928 mm
|
Width
1855 mm
|
|
Height
1910 - 1945 mm
|
Height
1685 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
3100 - 6600 L
|
Max trunk capacity
1604 - 1690 L
|
|
Payload
547 - 884 kg
|
Payload
390 - 600 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Diesel, Electric, Petrol
|
Engine Type
Full Hybrid, Plugin Hybrid
|
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Reduction Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
CVT
|
|
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
102 - 237 HP
|
Power HP
218 - 306 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
-
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6 - 8.4 s
|
|
Max Speed
120 - 140 km/h
|
Max Speed
180 km/h
|
|
Torque
270 - 500 Nm
|
Torque
-
|
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
|
Power kW
75 - 174 kW
|
Power kW
160 - 225 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1950 - 1999 cm3
|
Engine capacity
2487 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2024 - 2025
|
Model Year
2024 - 2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
G, A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, B
|
|
Brand
Mercedes-Benz
|
Brand
Toyota
|
What drive types are available for the Mercedes Vito Transporter?
The Mercedes Vito Transporter is available as Rear-Wheel Drive, Front-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.
The prices shown are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted for local VAT. Local registration taxes (e.g. NoVA, BPM or CO2 malus) are not included. This information is not legally binding.