VS

MG HS vs Mazda CX-60 comparison

Compare performance (272 HP vs 327 HP), boot space and price (30,000 £ vs 43,700 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – MG HS or Mazda CX-60?

MG HS vs Mazda CX-60: Key differences

MG HS

4.7 (7 Reviews)
rate
  • substantially cheaper
  • substantially more efficient
  • clearly more electric range
  • only slightly lighter
details

Mazda CX-60

4.7 (8 Reviews)
rate
  • a bit more power
  • a bit quicker 0–100 km/h
  • moderately more trunk space
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

HS

Costs and Efficiency:

Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.

MG HS is substantially cheaper – starting at 30,000 £ , while the Mazda CX-60 costs 43,700 £ . That’s a price difference of around 13,680 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the MG HS uses 0.5 L/100km and is substantially more efficient than the Mazda CX-60 with 3.8 L/100km. The difference is about 3.3 L/100km.

As for electric range, the MG HS offers clearly more range – reaching up to 100 km, about 37 km more than the Mazda CX-60.

CX-60

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the Mazda CX-60 offers a bit more power – delivering 327 HP compared to 272 HP. That’s roughly 55 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Mazda CX-60 is a bit quicker – completing the sprint in 5.8 s, while the MG HS takes 6.8 s. That’s about 1 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Mazda CX-60 delivers noticeably more torque with 550 Nm compared to 350 Nm. That’s about 200 Nm more.

HS

Space and Everyday Use:

Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, MG HS is only slightly lighter – 1,735 kg compared to 1,890 kg. The difference is around 155 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Mazda CX-60 offers moderately more boot space – 570 L compared to 507 L. That’s a difference of about 63 L.

When it comes to payload, the Mazda CX-60 carries visibly more – 612 kg compared to 400 kg. That’s a difference of about 212 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The MG HS is clearly superior overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £30,000
HS

MG HS

  • Engine Type : Full Hybrid, Plugin Hybrid
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 224 - 272 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 0.5 - 5.5 L/100km
  • Electric Range : 100 km
details

Frequently compared as well

Hyundai Tucson
MG HS
VS
Put the Hyundai Tucson up against the MG HS and its plug‑in EHS sibling and you get a tasty choice: Korean refinement and all‑round polish versus MG's bargain-packed, tech-forward alternatives. We'll sort practicality, driving feel, equipment and running costs so you can pick the SUV that actually …
BYD Seal U
MG HS
VS
Fresh from BYD’s EV revolution, the sleek Seal U brings range, tech and bold styling to spar with the MG HS/EHS — MG’s faithful family crossover offered as a petrol and a plug‑in hybrid that plays the safe, sensible card. Which one gives you the best mix of space, running costs and grin‑per‑mile?
MG HS
Mazda CX-60

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

MG HS

The MG HS, also known as the EHS in its hybrid variant, is a midsize SUV that combines modern design with a focus on comfort and technology. Its spacious interior offers a premium feel, enhanced by quality materials and an array of advanced features aimed at ensuring a smooth driving experience. Known for its efficiency, the MG HS/EHS delivers an enjoyable ride whether navigating city streets or taking on longer road trips.

details
Left-Front-45
Front-Side
Right-Back-45
Side-large-interior-1

Reviews MG HS

4.7 (7 Reviews)
rate
Mac Finn
29 Oct 2025, 11:27:52

Good perfomance and superbly low fuel consumption in daily use.

Mazda CX-60

The Mazda CX-60 pairs sculpted, understated looks with poised handling and a cabin that punches above its class, making long drives feel unexpectedly civilized. For buyers who want a premium feel without the showroom swagger, it's the sort of car that earns respect quietly — and still manages a wink when you push on.

details
2022_mazda_cx-60_tr_rw_act_006_highres
2022_mazda_cx-60_tr_rw_act_008_highres
2022_mazda_cx-60_europe_still_010_highres
2022_mazda_cx-60_germany_rw_int_002_highres

Reviews Mazda CX-60

4.7 (8 Reviews)
rate
Leo
7 Mar 2026, 11:15:10

👍

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Long-distance driver
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
THEO
7 Mar 2026, 07:02:13

2026 model is the new standard, great car.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
andy
15 Feb 2026, 18:05:07

A car with lots of problems — more trips to the garage than anything else.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Company car / Business
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Frequently compared as well

Mazda CX-60
Mazda CX-6e
VS
Comparing the Mazda CX-60 and Mazda CX-6e puts two of Mazda’s mid-size crossover offerings head-to-head to see which suits your needs best. I’ll focus on styling, interior quality, powertrain choices, driving dynamics and running costs so you can pick the smarter choice for daily use and long-term …
Ford Kuga
MG HS
VS
The Ford Kuga and MG HS are popular compact SUVs that appeal to buyers after roomy cabins and practical everyday driving — the Kuga leans toward sharper handling and more refined powertrain options, while the MG HS focuses on strong value and generous standard kit. This comparison cuts through the …
Mazda CX-5
Mazda CX-60
VS
If you want a compact, affordable SUV that’s fun to drive and sensible for most families, the Mazda CX-5 remains the clever everyday choice; if you crave more space, a buttoned-up premium cabin and the option of a potent straight-six or PHEV, the Mazda CX-60 steps up as the grown-up alternative. …
Dacia Bigster
MG HS
VS
This comparison pits the Dacia Bigster against the MG HS to help real buyers choose between a rugged, value-focused family SUV and a more polished, feature-rich rival. The Bigster prioritises low running costs, robustness and space, while the MG HS offers greater refinement, kit and driving comfort …
Kia Sportage
MG HS
VS
Two likeable compact crossovers go head-to-head: the well-rounded Kia Sportage versus the value-packed MG HS and its electrified twin, the EHS. Which wins on everyday practicality, kit and style — and which one is the clever buy for your driveway and wallet?
Omoda 5
MG HS
VS
Choosing between the Omoda 5 and the MG HS comes down to whether you want a compact crossover that prioritises bold styling and tech, or a more traditionally sized SUV that leans on space and refinement. Below is a clear, experience-based comparison to help match each model to your driving …
MG HS
MG MGS5 EV
VS
Think of the MG HS (and its EHS plug‑in hybrid) as the sensible, budget‑friendly family SUV — roomy, comfortable and annoyingly practical — while the MG MGS5 EV flips the script with instant electric torque, sharper handling and far more tech for your money. Pick the HS/EHS if you want proven value …
BMW X3
Mazda CX-60
VS
The BMW X3 and Mazda CX-60 occupy the premium mid-size SUV segment but take different routes—the X3 prioritizes dynamic performance and upscale refinement, while the CX-60 leans toward refined comfort, efficiency and strong value. This comparison will help you decide which suits your priorities: …
MG HS
Mazda CX-60

Costs and Consumption
Price
30,000 - 36,000 £
Price
43,700 - 57,900 £
Consumption L/100km
0.5 - 5.5 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
3.8 - 5.2 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
100 km
Electric Range
63 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
14 - 126 g/km
co2
85 - 137 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,735 - 1,930 kg
Curb weight
1,890 - 2,055 kg
Trunk capacity
507 L
Trunk capacity
570 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,890 mm
Width
1,890 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
400 kg
Payload
581 - 612 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Full Hybrid, Plugin Hybrid
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid, Diesel MHEV
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive, Rear-Wheel Drive
Power HP
224 - 272 HP
Power HP
200 - 327 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.8 - 7.9 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.8 - 8.4 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
340 - 350 Nm
Torque
450 - 550 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4
Number of Cylinders
4 - 6
Power kW
165 - 200 kW
Power kW
147 - 241 kW
Engine capacity
1,496 cm3
Engine capacity
2,488 - 3,283 cm3

General
Model Year
2025
Model Year
2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, B
CO2 Efficiency Class
B, D, E
Brand
MG
Brand
Mazda
What drivetrain options does the MG HS have?

The MG HS is available as Front-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.