VS

MG MG3 vs VW T-Cross – Which one offers the better deal?

Everyday use, family trips or long-distance drives – here’s where the differences show.
Discover whether MG MG3 or VW T-Cross fits your lifestyle better.

MG3 @ news.mgmotor.eu

MG3 vs VW T-Cross: A Comprehensive Comparison

The automotive market has witnessed a surge in competition, particularly in the compact and subcompact segments. Among these, the MG MG3 and VW T-Cross stand out for their distinct characteristics, technical prowess, and innovative features. This article delves into a detailed comparison of these two models, highlighting their technical specifications and innovations that make each a unique proposition for buyers.

T-Cross @ Volkswagen

Design and Dimensions

The MG3 is designed as a hatchback with dimensions of 4113 mm in length, 1797 mm in width, and 1502 mm in height, making it compact yet spacious for urban driving. On the other hand, the VW T-Cross is slightly larger, measuring 4127 mm in length, 1784 mm in width, and 1573 mm in height. Both vehicles have a five-door configuration, allowing easy access to the interiors.

MG3 @ news.mgmotor.eu

Powertrains and Performance

When it comes to powertrains, the MG3 offers a choice of a full hybrid and petrol engine, delivering power outputs of 116 HP and 194 HP respectively. In terms of acceleration, the MG3 can reach 100 km/h in just 8 seconds while also being efficient, with fuel consumption ranging from 4.4 to 6.1 L/100km. It employs a front-wheel-drive system and is equipped with a 36-liter fuel tank.

The VW T-Cross, with its varied engine options, offers petrol engines ranging from 95 to 150 HP. It features a front-wheel-drive layout as well, with acceleration times varying from 8.4 to 11.2 seconds depending on the engine variant. Fuel consumption for the T-Cross is slightly higher, ranging from 5.6 to 6.0 L/100km, and has a larger 40-liter fuel tank.

T-Cross @ Volkswagen

Interior and Cargo Space

Both vehicles provide comfortable seating for five passengers. The trunk capacity differs significantly; the MG3 offers 293 liters of space, while the T-Cross has a more generous cargo area of 455 liters, making it a better choice for those who prioritize storage.

MG3 @ news.mgmotor.eu

Technological Innovations

Innovation is key in this segment, and both the MG3 and VW T-Cross boast notable technological features. The MG3 offers a modern infotainment system that supports smartphone integration and includes safety features like ABS and electronic stability control.

In contrast, the T-Cross brings a suite of advanced technological innovations, including VW's infotainment system, which is compatible with both Apple CarPlay and Android Auto. Safety is enhanced with adaptive cruise control and lane-keeping assist, putting it a notch higher in terms of features.

T-Cross @ Volkswagen

Efficiency and Emissions

In terms of emissions, the MG3 leads with a CO2 output of 100 g/km, classified in the C efficiency group, which is commendable for a hatchback. The T-Cross, while still efficient, comes with emissions ranging from 127 to 135 g/km, placing it in the D efficiency class.

MG3 @ news.mgmotor.eu

Price and Value

Pricing is always a critical factor, and while specific figures can vary by market, MG typically positions the MG3 as a budget-friendly option, appealing to first-time car buyers or those seeking value. The VW T-Cross, embodying the VW brand's reputation for quality and performance, commands a premium, but buyers can expect a robust suite of features and reliability in return.

T-Cross @ Volkswagen

Final Thoughts

In conclusion, both the MG3 and VW T-Cross cater to distinct audiences with their own strengths. The MG3 excels in its pricing, efficiency, and compact design, making it a practical choice for city dwellers. Conversely, the VW T-Cross offers versatility, advanced technology, and superior cargo space, appealing more to families or those needing more room. Ultimately, the choice between these two models will depend on individual preferences and needs.

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Costs and Efficiency:

Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.

MG MG3 has a clearly perceptible advantage in terms of price – it starts at 15400 £, while the VW T-Cross costs 21100 £. That’s a price difference of around 5657 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: MG MG3 manages with 4.40 L and is therefore noticeable more efficient than the VW T-Cross with 5.40 L. The difference is about 1 L per 100 km.

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the MG MG3 has a distinct edge – offering 194 HP compared to 150 HP. That’s roughly 44 HP more horsepower.

In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the MG MG3 is slight quicker – completing the sprint in 8 s, while the VW T-Cross takes 8.40 s. That’s about 0.40 s faster.

In terms of top speed, the VW T-Cross performs slight better – reaching 200 km/h, while the MG MG3 tops out at 185 km/h. The difference is around 15 km/h.

There’s also a difference in torque: VW T-Cross pulls significantly stronger with 250 Nm compared to 148 Nm. That’s about 102 Nm difference.

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In curb weight, MG MG3 is slight lighter – 1237 kg compared to 1267 kg. The difference is around 30 kg.

In terms of boot space, the VW T-Cross offers evident more room – 455 L compared to 293 L. That’s a difference of about 162 L.

In maximum load capacity, the VW T-Cross performs evident better – up to 1281 L, which is about 298 L more than the MG MG3.

When it comes to payload, VW T-Cross minimal takes the win – 480 kg compared to 448 kg. That’s a difference of about 32 kg.

Who wins the race?

The MG MG3 proves to be wins by a narrow margin and therefore becomes our DriveDuel Champion!
MG MG3 is the better all-rounder in this comparison.

from about £15,400
KV-1-1

MG MG3

  • Engine Type : Full Hybrid, Petrol
  • Transmission : Automatic, Manuel
  • Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 116 - 194 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 4.4 - 6.1 L
details

MG MG3

5 (1)
rate

The MG MG3 presents itself as a vibrant and compact hatchback that's well-suited for urban environments. Its design combines a youthful aesthetic with practicality, offering a comfortable interior and a user-friendly infotainment system. With its engaging driving dynamics, it provides an enjoyable city ride that belies its budget-friendly pricing.

details
KV-1-1 @ news.mgmotor.eu
Left-Back-30°-1 @ news.mgmotor.eu
Front-Row-Space-1 @ news.mgmotor.eu
Trunk-3 @ news.mgmotor.eu

VW T-Cross

4 (1)
rate

The VW T-Cross stands out as a versatile compact SUV that combines practicality with style. Its interior design offers a spacious and flexible layout, ideal for both city driving and weekend adventures. With its modern infotainment system, the T-Cross ensures drivers and passengers stay connected throughout their journeys.

details
DB2021AU01108_medium @ Volkswagen
DB2021AU01109_medium @ Volkswagen
DB2021AU01111_medium @ Volkswagen
DB2021AU01114_medium @ Volkswagen
DB2021AU01120_medium @ Volkswagen
DB2021AU01124_medium @ Volkswagen

Similar Comparisons

Citroen C3 Aircross
VW T-Cross
VS
Audi Q2
VW T-Cross
VS
In the compact SUV segment, the Audi Q2 and VW T-Cross offer distinct personalities, catering to varying consumer preferences. The Q2 boasts a more premium feel with its upscale interior and engaging driving dynamics, while the T-Cross provides practicality with its spacious cabin and impressive cargo capacity. Ultimately, the choice between these two models hinges on whether buyers prioritize luxury or versatility in their everyday driving experiences.
MG MG3
VW T-Cross
MG3
T-Cross

Costs and Consumption
Price
15400 - 21400 £
Price
21100 - 31500 £
Consumption L/100km
4.4 - 6.1 L
Consumption L/100km
5.4 - 6 L
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
-
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
100 - 137 g/km
co2
124 - 136 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
36 - 45 L
Fuel tank capacity
40 L

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
Hatchback
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
5
Doors
5
Curb weight
1237 - 1285 kg
Curb weight
1267 - 1338 kg
Trunk capacity
293 L
Trunk capacity
455 L
Length
4113 mm
Length
4127 mm
Width
1797 mm
Width
1784 mm
Height
1502 mm
Height
1573 mm
Max trunk capacity
983 L
Max trunk capacity
1281 L
Payload
373 - 448 kg
Payload
463 - 480 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Full Hybrid, Petrol
Engine Type
Petrol
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox, Manual Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
116 - 194 HP
Power HP
95 - 150 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8 - 10.8 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.4 - 11.3 s
Max Speed
170 - 185 km/h
Max Speed
180 - 200 km/h
Torque
148 Nm
Torque
175 - 250 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
Power kW
85 - 143 kW
Power kW
70 - 110 kW
Engine capacity
1490 - 1495 cm3
Engine capacity
999 - 1498 cm3

General
Model Year
2024 - 2025
Model Year
2024 - 2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
C, E
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E
Brand
MG
Brand
VW

Similar Comparisons

MG MG3
Vauxhall Corsa
VS
In the competitive hatchback segment, the MG3 and Vauxhall Corsa both offer attractive options for budget-conscious drivers. The MG3 stands out with its bold styling and surprisingly spacious interior, while the Vauxhall Corsa brings refined driving dynamics and advanced infotainment options to the table. Enthusiasts might appreciate the MG3’s engaging manual gearbox, whereas the Corsa impresses with its smooth ride quality and efficiency.
MG MG3
Renault Clio
VS
In the battle of budget-friendly hatchbacks, the MG3 takes on the Renault Clio, offering an impressive mix of practicality and style for the price-conscious consumer. While the Clio boasts a more refined interior and a well-established reputation, the MG3 stands out with its generous warranty and eye-catching design. Ultimately, the choice may come down to personal preference, as both models deliver unique strengths in this competitive segment.
Hyundai i10
MG MG3
VS
In the competitive segment of compact cars, the Hyundai i10 and MG MG3 present two compelling options for urban drivers. The i10 impresses with its fuel efficiency and stylish design, making it a popular choice among city dwellers. Meanwhile, the MG3 stands out with its spacious interior and impressive tech features, appealing to those who prioritize practicality without compromising on style.
Ford Puma
VW T-Cross
VS
In the battle of compact crossovers, the Ford Puma showcases a sporty design and dynamic handling, appealing to those who crave a fun driving experience. Meanwhile, the VW T-Cross emphasizes practicality and interior space, making it a top choice for families seeking comfort on the road. Both vehicles offer impressive tech features, but their differing approaches to style and functionality make this comparison a compelling one for potential buyers.
MG MG3
MG ZS
VS
In the automotive showdown between the MG MG3 and MG ZS, drivers are treated to a compelling choice between practicality and versatility. The MG3 distinguishes itself with its nimble handling and budget-friendly pricing, making it an excellent option for city dwellers. Meanwhile, the MG ZS impresses with its spacious interior and SUV capabilities, appealing to those seeking a blend of style and functionality for family adventures.
MG MG3
Toyota Yaris
VS
In the competitive subcompact market, the MG3 stands out with its bold styling and affordable pricing, making it an attractive option for budget-conscious buyers. In contrast, the Toyota Yaris offers a reputation for reliability and a more refined driving experience. While the MG3 impresses with its features and value, the Yaris remains a benchmark for quality and long-term ownership satisfaction.
Toyota Yaris Cross
VW T-Cross
VS
In the competitively growing subcompact SUV segment, the Toyota Yaris Cross and VW T-Cross stand out for their distinct offerings. The Yaris Cross boasts impressive hybrid efficiency and a rugged design, catering to environmentally conscious buyers seeking adventure. Meanwhile, the T-Cross excels in interior space and advanced technology, appealing to urban drivers looking for practicality without sacrificing style.
VW Polo
VW T-Cross
VS
In a head-to-head comparison, the VW Polo and the VW T-Cross cater to different driving needs while maintaining Volkswagen's signature quality. The Polo, a beloved supermini, offers a sleek and nimble ride ideal for urban environments, boasting efficiency and precision handling. On the other hand, the T-Cross presents a more robust option with its SUV-inspired design, offering increased space and versatility perfect for active families seeking a practical yet stylish vehicle.
What drivetrain options does the MG MG3 have?

The MG MG3 is offered with Front-Wheel Drive.

The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.