What drive types are available for the MG ZS?

The MG ZS is available as Front-Wheel Drive.

How much power does the MG ZS deliver on the road?

Depending on the version, the MG ZS delivers up to 197 HP.

How much fuel does the MG ZS use?

On average, the MG ZS consumes 5.10 L.

Is the Skoda Scala offered with different drivetrains?

The Skoda Scala is available as Front-Wheel Drive.

How powerful is the Skoda Scala's engine?

Up to 150 HP of power – depending on the configuration.

How much fuel does the Skoda Scala use?

Based on WLTP testing, consumption is around 5 L.

How big is the Skoda Scala overall?

The Skoda Scala measures 4362 mm long, 1793 mm wide and 1514 mm high.

MG ZS vs Skoda Scala comparison - differences, prices & technical data

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

ZS

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.

MG ZS has a slightly advantage in terms of price – it starts at 18000 £ , while the Skoda Scala costs 20900 £ . That’s a price difference of around 2914 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Skoda Scala manages with 5 L and is therefore hardly perceptible more efficient than the MG ZS with 5.10 L. The difference is about 0.10 L per 100 km.

Scala

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the MG ZS has a noticeable edge – offering 197 HP compared to 150 HP. That’s roughly 47 HP more horsepower.

In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Skoda Scala is minimal quicker – completing the sprint in 8.20 s, while the MG ZS takes 8.70 s. That’s about 0.50 s faster.

There’s also a difference in torque: Skoda Scala pulls convincingly stronger with 250 Nm compared to 148 Nm. That’s about 102 Nm difference.

ZS

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In curb weight, Skoda Scala is somewhat lighter – 1199 kg compared to 1330 kg. The difference is around 131 kg.

When it comes to payload, MG ZS hardly perceptible takes the win – 470 kg compared to 431 kg. That’s a difference of about 39 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The MG ZS is barely ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

Frequently compared as well

Skoda Fabia

Skoda Scala

VS

Think of the Skoda Fabia as the scrappy city wizard: compact, cheap to run and brilliantly easy to park, while the Skoda Scala feels like an adult hatchback with more space, sharper tech and a calmer, more composed ride. If you want thrift and cheeky agility, go Fabia; if you need room, refinement …

MG ZS

Omoda 5

VS

The MG ZS plays the sensible family card with roomy practicality and a wallet-friendly price, while the Omoda 5 arrives like the showy new kid on the block, sporting sharper styling and richer tech. Pick the ZS for straightforward comfort and low running costs; choose the Omoda 5 if you want …

Reviews MG ZS

4.4 (4 Reviews)

Ahmed
30 Sept 2025, 14:05:11

With all the features it offers at that price, the MG has no competition. A BMW X1 of similar dimensions with a few extra upgrades costs more than twice as much, and considering that 40% of MG’s spare parts come from Germany (Bosch, Continental, etc.), I’d go for the MG ZS Hybrid without a second thought.

Reviews Skoda Scala

4.9 (6 Reviews)

Jose Ant.
1 Feb 2026, 04:13:05

The Scala is roomier inside than it looks, and very agile on both the highway and in town — ideal for practical, family use. It also uses less fuel.

Show detailed rating

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car

Efficiency / Consumption & Range

Comfort & Interior

Driving Fun / Performance

Technology & Infotainment

Safety

Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use

Value for Money

Costs and Consumption
Price 18000 - 24000 £	Price 20900 - 30700 £
Consumption L/100km 5.1 - 6.5 L	Consumption L/100km 5 - 5.6 L
Consumption kWh/100km -	Consumption kWh/100km -
Electric Range -	Electric Range -
Battery Capacity -	Battery Capacity -
co2 115 - 145 g/km	co2 114 - 126 g/km
Fuel tank capacity -	Fuel tank capacity 50 L

Dimensions and Body
Body Type SUV	Body Type Hatchback
Seats 5	Seats 5
Doors -	Doors 5
Curb weight 1330 - 1420 kg	Curb weight 1199 - 1271 kg
Trunk capacity -	Trunk capacity 467 L
Length -	Length 4362 mm
Width 1818 mm	Width 1793 mm
Height -	Height 1514 mm
Max trunk capacity -	Max trunk capacity 1410 L
Payload 375 - 470 kg	Payload 403 - 431 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type Petrol, Full Hybrid	Engine Type Petrol
Transmission Manuel, Automatic	Transmission Manuel, Automatic
Transmission Detail Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox	Transmission Detail Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive	Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP 116 - 197 HP	Power HP 95 - 150 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h 8.7 - 12.5 s	Acceleration 0-100km/h 8.2 - 10.8 s
Max Speed -	Max Speed 192 - 221 km/h
Torque 148 Nm	Torque 175 - 250 Nm
Number of Cylinders 4	Number of Cylinders 3 - 4
Power kW 85 - 145 kW	Power kW 70 - 110 kW
Engine capacity 1495 - 1498 cm3	Engine capacity 999 - 1498 cm3