VS

MINI Aceman vs Fiat Panda comparison

Compare performance (258 HP vs 70 HP), boot space and price (27,000 £ vs 14,100 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – MINI Aceman or Fiat Panda?

MINI Aceman vs Fiat Panda: Key differences

MINI Aceman

4.5 (2 Reviews)
rate
  • considerably more power
  • clearly quicker 0–100 km/h
  • noticeably more trunk space
details

Fiat Panda

4.5 (3 Reviews)
rate
  • substantially cheaper
  • significantly lighter
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Aceman

Costs and Efficiency:

Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.

Fiat Panda is substantially cheaper – starting at 14,100 £ , while the MINI Aceman costs 27,000 £ . That’s a price difference of around 12,866 £.

Panda

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the MINI Aceman offers considerably more power – delivering 258 HP compared to 70 HP. That’s roughly 188 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the MINI Aceman is clearly quicker – completing the sprint in 6.4 s, while the Fiat Panda takes 13.9 s. That’s about 7.5 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the MINI Aceman delivers substantially more torque with 350 Nm compared to 92 Nm. That’s about 258 Nm more.

Aceman

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Seats: MINI Aceman offers more seats – 5 vs 4.

In terms of curb weight, Fiat Panda is significantly lighter – 1,055 kg compared to 1,720 kg. The difference is around 665 kg.

Looking at boot space, the MINI Aceman offers noticeably more boot space – 300 L compared to 225 L. That’s a difference of about 75 L.

When it comes to payload, the MINI Aceman carries markedly more – 530 kg compared to 365 kg. That’s a difference of about 165 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The MINI Aceman is far ahead overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £27,000
Aceman

MINI Aceman

  • Engine Type Electric
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 184 - 258 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km 14.1 - 16 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range 309 - 355 km
details

Frequently compared as well

Fiat Panda
Fiat Pandina
VS
Comparing the Fiat Panda and the Pandina helps you decide whether you want a practical, feature-rich city car or a pared-back, economical runabout. The Panda offers more space, comfort and equipment for everyday use, while the Pandina prioritises low running costs, simplicity and compact charm.
Fiat 500
Fiat Panda
VS
The Fiat 500 is a cheeky, retro-styled city charmer that wraps bright personality and nimble handling into a compact package ideal for urban life. By contrast, the Fiat Panda trades glamour for practicality — roomier, tougher on rough roads and far more usable for families or weekend escapes, so …
MINI Aceman
Fiat Panda

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

MINI Aceman

The MINI Aceman squeezes classic MINI charm into a sharper, more crossover-ready shape, trading some of the old curves for grown-up practicality while keeping the wink-and-grin personality buyers crave. Inside it's a surprisingly premium, customizable cabin that feels clever rather than cluttered, and on the road the Aceman is eager and nimble — ideal for city dwellers who want an SUV silhouette with proper fun behind the wheel.

details
P90545616_highRes_mini-aceman-se-04-20
P90545628_highRes_mini-aceman-se-04-20
P90547839_highRes_the-new-mini-aceman-

Reviews MINI Aceman

4.5 (2 Reviews)
rate
GEORGXRM
5 Jan 2026, 00:44:07

Amazing interior, sporty-funky exterior, great handles, good amount of power.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): City / Short distance
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Fiat Panda

The Panda is a charming, no-nonsense city companion that mixes cheerful Italian flair with genuinely useful practicality, making tight streets and daily errands feel less of a chore. Its honest simplicity, clever packaging and a dash of cheeky character make it a smart, low-stress buy for people who prefer sensible perks over showroom flash.

details
FCA_Germany _FIAT_Panda_&_500_Hybrid_2020_333
FCA_Germany _FIAT_Panda_&_500_Hybrid_2020_157
FCA_Germany _FIAT_Panda_&_500_Hybrid_2020_304
FCA_Germany _FIAT_Panda_&_500_Hybrid_2020_049

Reviews Fiat Panda

4.5 (3 Reviews)
rate

No reviews yet. Share your experience and help others decide.

Frequently compared as well

Citroen C3
Fiat Panda
VS
Choosing between the Citroën C3 and the Fiat Panda often comes down to whether you want a comfort-focused, stylish city hatch or a no-nonsense, practical small car. I’ll highlight the key differences in interior space, fuel economy, driving feel and running costs so you can decide which suits your …
MINI Aceman
MINI Countryman
VS
Comparing the MINI Aceman and the MINI Countryman helps you decide between a compact, city-focused crossover and a roomier, more practical small SUV. The Aceman prioritises agile handling, crisp urban packaging and striking style, while the Countryman brings more interior space, versatile cargo …
Fiat Panda
Fiat Grande Panda
VS
Choosing between the Fiat Panda and the Fiat Grande Panda comes down to whether you want maximum city agility or extra space and comfort. The Panda is geared for tight urban driving and low running costs, while the Grande Panda offers a roomier cabin and more practicality for longer trips or small …
Fiat Panda
Toyota Aygo
VS
The Fiat Panda and Toyota Aygo are both popular city cars but take different approaches—Panda prioritises practicality, interior space and versatility, while the Aygo focuses on compact size, efficiency and easy urban manoeuvrability. This comparison will help you decide whether you need the …
MINI Aceman
Renault R5
VS
The MINI Aceman feels like a posh city rocket — cheeky handling, premium finishes and a slick interior make it the choice for drivers who want style and go‑kart fun wrapped in crossover practicality. The Renault 5, by contrast, pares back the flash for retro charm, more usable space and a …
Fiat Panda
Kia Picanto
VS
In the battle of the city cars, the Fiat Panda impresses with its quirky design and practicality, making it a favorite for those seeking versatility and charm. On the other hand, the Kia Picanto stands out with its punchy performance and a more modern tech-savvy interior, appealing to younger …
Fiat Panda
Peugeot 208
VS
The Fiat Panda and Peugeot 208 are two popular small hatchbacks that approach city driving very differently: the Panda emphasizes practicality, simplicity and surprising interior space, while the 208 prioritises style, refinement and modern tech. Choose the Panda for low running costs, rugged …
Fiat Panda
Opel Corsa
VS
In the competitive world of compact cars, the Fiat Panda and Opel Corsa stand out for their unique blend of style and practicality. While the Panda is celebrated for its quirky design and impressive versatility, the Corsa offers a more refined driving experience with superior tech features. …
MINI Aceman
Fiat Panda

Costs and Consumption
Price
27,000 - 36,400 £
Price
14,100 £
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption L/100km
5 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
14.1 - 16 kWh/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
309 - 355 km
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
0 g/km
co2
113 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
38 L

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
Hatchback
Seats
5
Seats
4
Doors
-
Doors
5
Curb weight
1,720 - 1,825 kg
Curb weight
1,055 kg
Trunk capacity
300 L
Trunk capacity
225 L
Length
-
Length
3,635 mm
Width
1,754 mm
Width
1,643 mm
Height
-
Height
1,551 mm
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
870 L
Payload
450 - 530 kg
Payload
365 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Electric
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Manuel
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
184 - 258 HP
Power HP
70 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.4 - 7.9 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
13.9 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
164 km/h
Torque
290 - 350 Nm
Torque
92 Nm
Number of Cylinders
-
Number of Cylinders
3
Power kW
135 - 190 kW
Power kW
51 kW
Engine capacity
-
Engine capacity
999 cm3

General
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
Model Year
2024
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
CO2 Efficiency Class
C
Brand
MINI
Brand
Fiat
What drive types are available for the MINI Aceman?

Available configurations include Front-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.