Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
Česko
EspañaVS
MINI Aceman vs Hongqi E-HS9 comparison
Compare performance (258 HP vs 551 HP), boot space and price (27,000 £ vs 68,600 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – MINI Aceman or Hongqi E-HS9?
MINI Aceman vs Hongqi E-HS9: Key differences
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
Aceman
Costs and Efficiency:
Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.
MINI Aceman is considerably cheaper – starting at 27,000 £ , while the Hongqi E-HS9 costs 68,600 £ . That’s a price difference of around 41,567 £.
In terms of energy consumption, the MINI Aceman is clearly more efficient: consuming 14.1 kWh/100km compared to 19.4 kWh/100km for the Hongqi E-HS9. That’s a difference of about 5.3 kWh/100km.
As for electric range, the Hongqi E-HS9 offers visibly more range – reaching up to 515 km, about 160 km more than the MINI Aceman.
E-HS9
Engine and Performance:
Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.
When it comes to engine power, the Hongqi E-HS9 offers considerably more power – delivering 551 HP compared to 258 HP. That’s roughly 293 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Hongqi E-HS9 is visibly quicker – completing the sprint in 4.9 s, while the MINI Aceman takes 6.4 s. That’s about 1.5 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Hongqi E-HS9 delivers considerably more torque with 670 Nm compared to 350 Nm. That’s about 320 Nm more.
Aceman
Space and Everyday Use:
Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.
Seats: Hongqi E-HS9 offers more seats – 7 vs 5.
In terms of curb weight, MINI Aceman is significantly lighter – 1,720 kg compared to 2,705 kg. The difference is around 985 kg.
Looking at boot space, the MINI Aceman offers considerably more boot space – 300 L compared to 0 L. That’s a difference of about 300 L.
When it comes to payload, the MINI Aceman carries somewhat more – 530 kg compared to 475 kg. That’s a difference of about 55 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The MINI Aceman holds a decisive overall lead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
from £27,000
MINI Aceman
MINI Aceman
Hongqi E-HS9
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
MINI Aceman
The MINI Aceman squeezes classic MINI charm into a sharper, more crossover-ready shape, trading some of the old curves for grown-up practicality while keeping the wink-and-grin personality buyers crave. Inside it's a surprisingly premium, customizable cabin that feels clever rather than cluttered, and on the road the Aceman is eager and nimble — ideal for city dwellers who want an SUV silhouette with proper fun behind the wheel.
details
Hongqi E-HS9
The Hongqi E-HS9 arrives like a modern state limousine rewired into an electric SUV, all imposing chrome, tall presence and an interior that aims to cocoon occupants in luxury. It's serenely quiet and packed with tech, offering a compelling, slightly quirky alternative to established European luxury SUVs for buyers who want drama as much as comfort.
details
MINI Aceman
Hongqi E-HS9
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
27,000 - 36,400 £
|
Price
68,600 - 88,300 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
14.1 - 16 kWh/100km
|
Consumption kWh/100km
19.4 kWh/100km
|
|
Electric Range
309 - 355 km
|
Electric Range
465 - 515 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
0 g/km
|
co2
0 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
6 - 7
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
1,720 - 1,825 kg
|
Curb weight
2,705 - 2,777 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
300 L
|
Trunk capacity
0 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,754 mm
|
Width
2,010 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
450 - 530 kg
|
Payload
455 - 475 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
184 - 258 HP
|
Power HP
551 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.4 - 7.9 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.9 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
290 - 350 Nm
|
Torque
670 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
|
Power kW
135 - 190 kW
|
Power kW
405 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
-
|
Engine capacity
-
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
|
Model Year
2024
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
|
Brand
MINI
|
Brand
Hongqi
|
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved.
The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.