Compare performance (156 HP vs 258 HP), boot space and price (22500 £ vs 25500 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Jeep Avenger or MINI Aceman?
In the ever-evolving landscape of electric vehicles, compact SUVs have gained immense popularity, melding practicality with sustainability. Two leading contenders in this segment are the Jeep Avenger and the MINI Aceman. These models offer distinctive features, setting new benchmarks in technology and driving experience. Let’s delve into a detailed comparison.
The Jeep Avenger offers a versatile range when it comes to powertrains. It boasts both electric and petrol engines, appealing to a broader spectrum of consumers. The electric variant of the Avenger generates a respectable 156 HP and 260 Nm of torque, ensuring a smooth ride. Its acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h is accomplished in 9 seconds, with a top speed of 150 km/h.
In contrast, the MINI Aceman, designed solely as an electric vehicle, takes a different approach to power. With options going up to 258 HP and 350 Nm of torque, it sprints from 0 to 100 km/h in a zippy 6.4 seconds. It achieves a maximum speed of 200 km/h, reflecting its more performance-focused engineering.
Efficiency is a critical factor for electric SUVs. The Jeep Avenger’s electric variant provides an impressive range of up to 400 km on a full charge, thanks to its 51 kWh battery. This makes it an excellent choice for long road trips and daily commuting alike.
Meanwhile, the MINI Aceman, with a slightly smaller 49.2 kWh battery, offers a competitive range of up to 405 km. Considering its power output, the Aceman manages to deliver impressive efficiency, with consumption figures as low as 14 kWh/100 km.
Both vehicles encapsulate the essence of compact SUVs but with their unique brand signatures. The Jeep Avenger measures 4084 mm in length, 1776 mm in width, and stands 1536 mm tall, offering a robust presence on the road. It features a spacious 5-door design with a trunk capacity of 355 liters.
The MINI Aceman, slightly more compact, is 4079 mm long, 1754 mm wide, and 1514 mm in height. Its distinctive 3-door layout is coupled with a 300-liter trunk, emphasizing stylish urban use without compromising practicality.
The Jeep Avenger showcases Jeep's blend of rugged capability and modern tech, offering all-wheel drives in certain variants and a variety of transmission options, including automatic and manual gearboxes.
On the other hand, the MINI Aceman displays MINI’s commitment to innovative electric mobility. Its futuristic design and focus on driving dynamics include features like a reduction gearbox and advanced driver assist technologies.
Both the Jeep Avenger and MINI Aceman represent forward-thinking solutions in the compact electric SUV segment. The Avenger is perfect for those seeking versatility with a choice between petrol and electric, while the Aceman is tailored for drivers looking for an agile, stylish, all-electric performance.
Ultimately, the decision comes down to personal preference: the rugged dependability of the Jeep or the dynamic elegance of the MINI. Whichever you choose, both promise a step forward into the future of automotive mobility.
Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.
Jeep Avenger has a somewhat advantage in terms of price – it starts at 22500 £ , while the MINI Aceman costs 25500 £ . That’s a price difference of around 2915 £.
In terms of energy consumption, the advantage goes to the MINI Aceman: with 14 kWh per 100 km, it’s a bit more efficient than the Jeep Avenger with 15.50 kWh. That’s a difference of about 1.50 kWh.
As for electric range, the MINI Aceman performs minimal better – achieving up to 405 km, about 5 km more than the Jeep Avenger.
Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.
When it comes to engine power, the MINI Aceman has a clearly perceptible edge – offering 258 HP compared to 156 HP. That’s roughly 102 HP more horsepower.
In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the MINI Aceman is convincingly quicker – completing the sprint in 6.40 s, while the Jeep Avenger takes 9 s. That’s about 2.60 s faster.
In terms of top speed, the MINI Aceman performs hardly perceptible better – reaching 200 km/h, while the Jeep Avenger tops out at 194 km/h. The difference is around 6 km/h.
There’s also a difference in torque: MINI Aceman pulls clearly perceptible stronger with 350 Nm compared to 260 Nm. That’s about 90 Nm difference.
Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In curb weight, Jeep Avenger is convincingly lighter – 1180 kg compared to 1720 kg. The difference is around 540 kg.
In terms of boot space, the Jeep Avenger offers noticeable more room – 380 L compared to 300 L. That’s a difference of about 80 L.
In maximum load capacity, the Jeep Avenger performs distinct better – up to 1277 L, which is about 272 L more than the MINI Aceman.
When it comes to payload, MINI Aceman slight takes the win – 530 kg compared to 502 kg. That’s a difference of about 28 kg.
The MINI Aceman holds a decisive overall lead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The Jeep Avenger shrinks Jeep's boxy, adventurous styling into a city-friendly electric crossover that looks just as at home on tight streets as it does on muddy weekend lanes. It's a savvy pick for drivers who want go-anywhere attitude without the truck-size ego — practical inside, lively around town and ready to tackle a bit of rough stuff when the mood strikes.
details
The MINI Aceman squeezes classic MINI charm into a sharper, more crossover-ready shape, trading some of the old curves for grown-up practicality while keeping the wink-and-grin personality buyers crave. Inside it's a surprisingly premium, customizable cabin that feels clever rather than cluttered, and on the road the Aceman is eager and nimble — ideal for city dwellers who want an SUV silhouette with proper fun behind the wheel.
details
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
22500 - 36900 £
|
Price
25500 - 36200 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
4.9 - 5.7 L
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
15.50 kWh
|
Consumption kWh/100km
14 - 16 kWh
|
|
Electric Range
400 km
|
Electric Range
303 - 405 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
51 kWh
|
Battery Capacity
38.5 - 49.2 kWh
|
|
co2
0 - 129 g/km
|
co2
0 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
44 L
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
1180 - 1520 kg
|
Curb weight
1720 - 1825 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
325 - 380 L
|
Trunk capacity
300 L
|
|
Length
4084 - 4088 mm
|
Length
4079 mm
|
|
Width
1776 mm
|
Width
1754 mm
|
|
Height
1527 - 1541 mm
|
Height
1514 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1218 - 1277 L
|
Max trunk capacity
1005 L
|
|
Payload
494 - 502 kg
|
Payload
450 - 530 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric, Petrol MHEV, Petrol
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
|
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic, Manual Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
100 - 156 HP
|
Power HP
184 - 258 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
9 - 10.6 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.4 - 7.9 s
|
|
Max Speed
150 - 194 km/h
|
Max Speed
160 - 200 km/h
|
|
Torque
205 - 260 Nm
|
Torque
290 - 350 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
3
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
|
Power kW
74 - 115 kW
|
Power kW
135 - 190 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1199 cm3
|
Engine capacity
-
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2023 - 2026
|
Model Year
2024 - 2026
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A, C, D
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
|
Brand
Jeep
|
Brand
MINI
|
Available configurations include Front-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.
Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
España