Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Norge
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
EspañaVS
MINI Aceman vs Volvo EX30 - Differences and prices compared
Compare performance (258 HP vs 428 HP), boot space and price (25500 £ vs 33000 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – MINI Aceman or Volvo EX30?
Aceman
Costs and Efficiency:
When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.
MINI Aceman has a evident advantage in terms of price – it starts at 25500 £ , while the Volvo EX30 costs 33000 £ . That’s a price difference of around 7534 £.
In terms of energy consumption, the advantage goes to the MINI Aceman: with 14 kWh per 100 km, it’s evident more efficient than the Volvo EX30 with 17 kWh. That’s a difference of about 3 kWh.
As for electric range, the Volvo EX30 performs slightly better – achieving up to 476 km, about 71 km more than the MINI Aceman.
EX30
Engine and Performance:
Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.
When it comes to engine power, the Volvo EX30 has a noticeable edge – offering 428 HP compared to 258 HP. That’s roughly 170 HP more horsepower.
In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Volvo EX30 is decisively quicker – completing the sprint in 3.60 s, while the MINI Aceman takes 6.40 s. That’s about 2.80 s faster.
In terms of top speed, the MINI Aceman performs minimal better – reaching 200 km/h, while the Volvo EX30 tops out at 180 km/h. The difference is around 20 km/h.
There’s also a difference in torque: Volvo EX30 pulls clearly perceptible stronger with 543 Nm compared to 350 Nm. That’s about 193 Nm difference.
Ad · Affiliate
As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
Aceman
Space and Everyday Use:
Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In curb weight, MINI Aceman is barely noticeable lighter – 1720 kg compared to 1840 kg. The difference is around 120 kg.
In terms of boot space, the Volvo EX30 offers minimal more room – 318 L compared to 300 L. That’s a difference of about 18 L.
In maximum load capacity, the MINI Aceman performs barely noticeable better – up to 1005 L, which is about 5 L more than the Volvo EX30.
When it comes to payload, MINI Aceman distinct takes the win – 530 kg compared to 390 kg. That’s a difference of about 140 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The Volvo EX30 holds a decisive overall lead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
MINI Aceman
Volvo EX30
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
from about £33,000
Volvo EX30
MINI Aceman
4.6 (1 Reviews)
The MINI Aceman squeezes classic MINI charm into a sharper, more crossover-ready shape, trading some of the old curves for grown-up practicality while keeping the wink-and-grin personality buyers crave. Inside it's a surprisingly premium, customizable cabin that feels clever rather than cluttered, and on the road the Aceman is eager and nimble — ideal for city dwellers who want an SUV silhouette with proper fun behind the wheel.
details
Volvo EX30
3 (2 Reviews)
The Volvo EX30 arrives as a compact electric with crisp Scandinavian design and a cheeky personality, proving you can be serious about safety and still enjoy a grin on your commute. Its cabin is cleverly packaged and delightfully easy to live with, offering smart tech and practical touches that make it feel like a grown-up's city car with a sense of fun.
details
MINI Aceman
Volvo EX30
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
25500 - 36200 £
|
Price
33000 - 49100 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
14 - 16 kWh
|
Consumption kWh/100km
17 - 18.7 kWh
|
|
Electric Range
303 - 405 km
|
Electric Range
339 - 476 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
38.5 - 49.2 kWh
|
Battery Capacity
49 - 65 kWh
|
|
co2
0 g/km
|
co2
0 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
1720 - 1825 kg
|
Curb weight
1840 - 1960 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
300 L
|
Trunk capacity
318 L
|
|
Length
4079 mm
|
Length
4233 mm
|
|
Width
1754 mm
|
Width
1838 mm
|
|
Height
1514 mm
|
Height
1550 - 1567 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1005 L
|
Max trunk capacity
1000 L
|
|
Payload
450 - 530 kg
|
Payload
370 - 390 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
184 - 258 HP
|
Power HP
272 - 428 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.4 - 7.9 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
3.6 - 5.7 s
|
|
Max Speed
160 - 200 km/h
|
Max Speed
180 km/h
|
|
Torque
290 - 350 Nm
|
Torque
343 - 543 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
|
Power kW
135 - 190 kW
|
Power kW
200 - 315 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
-
|
Engine capacity
-
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2024 - 2025
|
Model Year
2024 - 2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
|
Brand
MINI
|
Brand
Volvo
|
Is the MINI Aceman offered with different drivetrains?
The MINI Aceman is available as Front-Wheel Drive.
The prices shown are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted for local VAT. Local registration taxes (e.g. NoVA, BPM or CO2 malus) are not included. This information is not legally binding.