VS

MINI Aceman vs Volvo EX30 comparison

Compare performance (258 HP vs 428 HP), boot space and price (27,000 £ vs 30,000 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – MINI Aceman or Volvo EX30?

MINI Aceman vs Volvo EX30: Key differences

MINI Aceman

4.5 (2 Reviews)
rate
  • somewhat cheaper
  • clearly more efficient
  • very slightly lighter
details

Volvo EX30

3.5 (8 Reviews)
rate
  • clearly more power
  • clearly more electric range
  • significantly quicker 0–100 km/h
  • very slightly more trunk space
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Aceman

Electric Showdown: MINI Aceman vs. Volvo EX30

As the automotive industry increasingly pivots towards electrification, the spotlight is on two intriguing contenders in the electric SUV market: the MINI Aceman and the Volvo EX30. Both models embody innovative design and advanced technology, appealing to eco-conscious consumers seeking style and performance. This article dives deep into the specifications, features, and innovations that make these electric SUVs stand out.

EX30

Powertrain and Performance

The MINI Aceman boasts a lineup of powerful electric options ranging from 184 to 258 HP, courtesy of its front-wheel-drive setup. With torque figures peaking at 350 Nm, it exhibits spirited acceleration, claiming 0-100 km/h times ranging from 6.4 to 7.9 seconds. In contrast, the Volvo EX30 takes performance up a notch with a rear-wheel-drive option and an exhilarating all-wheel-drive alternative. The EX30 features power outputs from 272 to an incredible 428 HP and showcases torque numbers that soar to 543 Nm, allowing for a blistering 0-100 km/h time of just 3.6 seconds in its most potent configuration.

Aceman

Battery and Range

Range anxiety is often a concern for electric vehicle owners, but both the Aceman and EX30 address this with commendable ranges. The Aceman offers an electric range of up to 405 km, powered by battery options of 38.5 kWh and 49.2 kWh. On the other hand, the EX30 raises the bar with an impressive maximum range of 476 km using its larger 65 kWh battery. This makes the EX30 a potentially more suitable choice for those with longer commutes or more adventurous travel plans.

EX30

Efficiency and Consumption

Efficiency is key in the electric vehicle realm, and the MINI Aceman showcases remarkable figures between 14.0 to 16.0 kWh/100 km. These stats highlight its capabilities as an efficient urban runabout. The Volvo EX30, while slightly less efficient, maintains a competitive edge with consumption figures around 17 to 17.5 kWh/100 km. Both models carry a CO2 efficiency class rating of 'A', reinforcing their commitment to sustainability.

Aceman

Dimensions and Interior Space

When it comes to size, the Volvo EX30 is more generous, measuring 4,233 mm in length and 1,837 mm in width, compared to the MINI Aceman’s 4,079 mm length and 1,754 mm width. This translates to slightly more interior and trunk space, with the EX30 providing 318 liters of cargo space, while the Aceman provides 300 liters. Both models offer seating for five, making them practical choices for families or groups.

EX30

Innovative Features and Technology

Both models embrace cutting-edge technology. The MINI Aceman integrates a high-definition infotainment system, advanced driver-assistance features, and customisable ambient lighting, highlighting MINI's playful spirit and user-focused design. The Aceman’s interior emphasizes a modern aesthetic combined with familiar MINI touches, offering a unique driving experience.

Conversely, the Volvo EX30 prioritizes safety and sophistication, equipped with an array of driver assistance systems and Volvo’s signature safety features. Its interior is minimalist yet functional, filled with premium materials that reflect Scandinavian design sensibilities.

Final Thoughts: Choosing Your Electric SUV

The decision between the MINI Aceman and the Volvo EX30 will largely depend on individual preferences and priorities. The Aceman is a stylish, efficient option that's perfect for urban driving, while the EX30 positions itself as a performance-oriented, spacious electric SUV suitable for various terrains and longer trips. Both models represent the future of electric mobility, pushing boundaries in design and innovation.

Frequently compared as well

Volvo EX30
Kia EV2
VS
The Volvo EX30 and Kia EV2 are compact electric crossovers that balance urban-friendly size with modern tech, safety systems, and strong value propositions. This comparison focuses on range, performance, interior quality, and ownership costs to help you decide which suits your priorities.
Volvo EX30
Volvo EX60
VS
The Volvo EX30 and EX60 represent two different takes on Volvo’s electric SUV lineup: the EX30 is a compact, city-focused, entry-level EV while the EX60 is a larger, mid-size option that emphasizes space, range and family comfort. This comparison cuts through specs and real-world strengths so you …

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Aceman

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.

MINI Aceman is somewhat cheaper – starting at 27,000 £ , while the Volvo EX30 costs 30,000 £ . That’s a price difference of around 2,991 £.

In terms of energy consumption, the MINI Aceman is clearly more efficient: consuming 14.1 kWh/100km compared to 17 kWh/100km for the Volvo EX30. That’s a difference of about 2.9 kWh/100km.

As for electric range, the Volvo EX30 offers clearly more range – reaching up to 475 km, about 120 km more than the MINI Aceman.

EX30

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the Volvo EX30 offers clearly more power – delivering 428 HP compared to 258 HP. That’s roughly 170 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Volvo EX30 is significantly quicker – completing the sprint in 3.6 s, while the MINI Aceman takes 6.4 s. That’s about 2.8 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Volvo EX30 delivers clearly more torque with 543 Nm compared to 350 Nm. That’s about 193 Nm more.

Aceman

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, MINI Aceman is very slightly lighter – 1,720 kg compared to 1,840 kg. The difference is around 120 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Volvo EX30 offers very slightly more boot space – 318 L compared to 300 L. That’s a difference of about 18 L.

When it comes to payload, the MINI Aceman carries visibly more – 530 kg compared to 390 kg. That’s a difference of about 140 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Volvo EX30 is clearly superior overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £30,000
EX30

Volvo EX30

  • Engine Type Electric
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 150 - 428 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km 17 - 18.3 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range 339 - 475 km
details
MINI Aceman
Volvo EX30

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

MINI Aceman

The MINI Aceman squeezes classic MINI charm into a sharper, more crossover-ready shape, trading some of the old curves for grown-up practicality while keeping the wink-and-grin personality buyers crave. Inside it's a surprisingly premium, customizable cabin that feels clever rather than cluttered, and on the road the Aceman is eager and nimble — ideal for city dwellers who want an SUV silhouette with proper fun behind the wheel.

details
P90545616_highRes_mini-aceman-se-04-20
P90545628_highRes_mini-aceman-se-04-20
P90547839_highRes_the-new-mini-aceman-

Reviews MINI Aceman

4.5 (2 Reviews)
rate
GEORGXRM
5 Jan 2026, 00:44:07

Amazing interior, sporty-funky exterior, great handles, good amount of power.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): City / Short distance
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Volvo EX30

The Volvo EX30 is a compact all-electric crossover that mixes Volvo's strong safety focus with clean Scandinavian design for a really city-friendly package. It feels lively and easy to live with, pairing a premium-feeling interior and modern connectivity with a practical footprint for urban driving.

details
313302_Volvo_EX30
313320_Volvo_EX30
313329_Volvo_EX30_interior
313334_Volvo_EX30_interior
313297_Volvo_EX30

Reviews Volvo EX30

3.5 (8 Reviews)
rate
V
8 Jun 2026, 10:03:34

Very disappointing overall for a car that comes to €57,500 with options.
After 27,000 km in it over 2 years — so many disappointments...
Despite Volvo’s updates, many “small” problems that ruin daily life:

Mirrors that desynchronize and reset when you open the car.
With the keyless option the car sometimes unlocks when you’re at a distance but won’t open when you try the door.
Intrusive driver aids that become dangerous: they slam the brakes when detecting phantom vehicles while reversing (with a wall behind) or detect vehicles in the lane to our left as a “vehicle coming from the left” (same in roundabouts).
Same issue when overtaking: it lets you pass without problem but then abruptly pushes you back into oncoming traffic when you cross the line to move over.
Screen that stays black or frozen for several tens of seconds at startup.
Performance drops sharply once battery falls below 60%.

Handling is rather mixed: very good when it was new, after two years it develops body roll, tends to overreact in corners (it bounces), and loses grip at the front in roundabouts (for a rear-wheel-drive…).

The engine is overall pleasant and powerful, but the chassis does not at all match the 272 hp.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): City / Short distance
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Maes Ivo
13 May 2026, 21:43:53

Volvo EX30 twin performance is een super handige compacte auto die vast op de weg ligt . Is pijlsnel en je zit iets hoger. Interieur went snel . Ik heb er zelf eentje en ben er verliefd op . Heb BMW G30 gehad . Fantastische auto , maar groot en onhandig . Geef mij maar de Volvo en we zijn maar met 2 .

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Company car / Business
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Michael
10 Feb 2026, 21:18:58

...the best electric car we've driven so far. Trouble-free, safe, tidy and easy to use.

The German predecessors (the Wolfsburg group) can be completely forgotten!

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Julien B.
10 Feb 2026, 15:47:03

A car that could have been brilliant, ruined by technological dogmatism. Ninety‑five percent of this car’s problems are between the windshield and the steering wheel. The positives are undone by a botched implantation of technology at all costs. Basic functions are hard to access, buried in menus, and the constant, useless warnings and alerts make the experience frustrating and wreck the overall ergonomics. Add recurring issues with the door‑locking system that the dealer can’t fix after several visits, a range far below what’s promised, and a collision‑avoidance system that randomly takes dangerous initiatives, and I can say this is the worst car I’ve ever bought. After several months, I deeply regret this purchase.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Marco
30 Dec 2025, 12:53:45

The onboard tech (tablet) takes too long to learn. It distracts from driving. Not suitable for the nearsighted — the tablet’s distance from your eyes basically forces you to wear trifocals. Letting off the gas slows the car, but it’s overly sensitive and you need time to get used to it. The buzzer for exceeding the speed limit is very annoying, and the system notices changes in road signs late. In short: driving it is stressful.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): City / Short distance
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Frequently compared as well

Volvo EX30
VW ID.Polo
VS
The Volvo EX30 and Volkswagen ID. Polo show two different philosophies for compact electrics: the EX30 emphasizes sporty performance, advanced safety and premium Scandinavian design, while the ID. Polo focuses on everyday practicality, value and efficient city driving. We'll compare range, …
MINI Aceman
MINI Countryman
VS
Comparing the MINI Aceman and the MINI Countryman helps you decide between a compact, city-focused crossover and a roomier, more practical small SUV. The Aceman prioritises agile handling, crisp urban packaging and striking style, while the Countryman brings more interior space, versatile cargo …
Renault R5
Volvo EX30
VS
The Renault 5 brings playful retro charm and clever city-sized packaging, while the Volvo EX30 feels like a pocket rocket from the future with serious EV range and safety tech. If you want personality and urban thrift go R5, but if you crave rapid electric shove, cutting-edge gadgets and …
Volvo EX30
Skoda Elroq
VS
Comparing the compact, tech-forward Volvo EX30 with the practical, value-driven Skoda Elroq highlights two different takes on the modern small SUV: the EX30 leans into agile electric performance and premium safety and tech, while the Elroq prioritizes roomy practicality and everyday versatility. …
Volvo EX30
Volvo EX40
VS
Comparing the Volvo EX30 and Volvo EX40 helps buyers choose between a compact, city-focused electric crossover and a slightly larger, more practical electric SUV. The EX30 prioritises agility, lower cost and urban ease, while the EX40 offers more interior space, range and family-friendly …
Ford Explorer EV
Volvo EX30
VS
Deciding between the Ford Explorer EV and the Volvo EX30 is essentially choosing between roomy, family-focused SUV capability and a compact, premium electric that prioritizes agility and efficiency. I’ll compare driving dynamics, range, tech, practicality and value to help you pick the best EV for …
Volvo EX30
Volvo EC40
VS
The Volvo EX30 and Volvo EC40 pit a compact, city-focused electric with lively handling against a larger, comfort-oriented electric aimed at family use. This comparison highlights key differences in range, interior space, driving feel and tech to help you choose which suits your needs.
Volvo EX30
CUPRA Raval
VS
Volvo EX30 and CUPRA Raval go head-to-head: compare performance, space, features and price in one quick overview to see which model suits your daily driving, budget and lifestyle better. A clear, side-by-side look helps you make the smarter choice.
MINI Aceman
Volvo EX30

Costs and Consumption
Price
27,000 - 36,400 £
Price
30,000 - 47,800 £
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
14.1 - 16 kWh/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
17 - 18.3 kWh/100km
Electric Range
309 - 355 km
Electric Range
339 - 475 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
0 g/km
co2
0 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,720 - 1,825 kg
Curb weight
1,840 - 1,960 kg
Trunk capacity
300 L
Trunk capacity
318 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,754 mm
Width
1,838 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
450 - 530 kg
Payload
370 - 390 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Electric
Engine Type
Electric
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
184 - 258 HP
Power HP
150 - 428 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.4 - 7.9 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
3.6 - 8.6 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
290 - 350 Nm
Torque
343 - 543 Nm
Number of Cylinders
-
Number of Cylinders
-
Power kW
135 - 190 kW
Power kW
110 - 315 kW
Engine capacity
-
Engine capacity
-

General
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
Model Year
2026
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
Brand
MINI
Brand
Volvo
What drive types are available for the MINI Aceman?

Available configurations include Front-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.