VS

MINI Aceman vs Skoda Scala comparison

Compare performance (258 HP vs 150 HP), boot space and price (27,000 £ vs 21,400 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – MINI Aceman or Skoda Scala?

MINI Aceman vs Skoda Scala: Key differences

MINI Aceman

4.6 (1 Reviews)
rate
  • substantially more power
  • markedly quicker 0–100 km/h
details

Skoda Scala

4.9 (7 Reviews)
rate
  • noticeably cheaper
  • considerably lighter
  • markedly more trunk space
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Aceman

Costs and Efficiency:

When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.

Skoda Scala is noticeably cheaper – starting at 21,400 £ , while the MINI Aceman costs 27,000 £ . That’s a price difference of around 5,572 £.

Scala

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the MINI Aceman offers substantially more power – delivering 258 HP compared to 150 HP. That’s roughly 108 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the MINI Aceman is markedly quicker – completing the sprint in 6.4 s, while the Skoda Scala takes 8.2 s. That’s about 1.8 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the MINI Aceman delivers visibly more torque with 350 Nm compared to 250 Nm. That’s about 100 Nm more.

Aceman

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Skoda Scala is considerably lighter – 1,199 kg compared to 1,720 kg. The difference is around 521 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Skoda Scala offers markedly more boot space – 467 L compared to 300 L. That’s a difference of about 167 L.

When it comes to payload, the MINI Aceman carries slightly more – 530 kg compared to 431 kg. That’s a difference of about 99 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The MINI Aceman is far ahead overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £27,000
Aceman

MINI Aceman

  • Engine Type : Electric
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 184 - 258 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km : 14.1 - 16 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range : 309 - 355 km
details

Frequently compared as well

Skoda Fabia
Skoda Scala
VS
Think of the Skoda Fabia as the scrappy city wizard: compact, cheap to run and brilliantly easy to park, while the Skoda Scala feels like an adult hatchback with more space, sharper tech and a calmer, more composed ride. If you want thrift and cheeky agility, go Fabia; if you need room, refinement …
Skoda Scala
VW Golf
VS
In one corner the Skoda Scala — clever, spacious and gloriously sensible; in the other the VW Golf — the benchmark hatchback that smooths out imperfections and keeps resale values healthy. Which one deserves your driveway: the Scala’s no-nonsense practicality and lower price, or the Golf’s polish, …
MINI Aceman
Skoda Scala

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

MINI Aceman

The MINI Aceman squeezes classic MINI charm into a sharper, more crossover-ready shape, trading some of the old curves for grown-up practicality while keeping the wink-and-grin personality buyers crave. Inside it's a surprisingly premium, customizable cabin that feels clever rather than cluttered, and on the road the Aceman is eager and nimble — ideal for city dwellers who want an SUV silhouette with proper fun behind the wheel.

details
P90545616_highRes_mini-aceman-se-04-20
P90545628_highRes_mini-aceman-se-04-20
P90547839_highRes_the-new-mini-aceman-

Reviews MINI Aceman

4.6 (1 Reviews)
rate
GEORGXRM
5 Jan 2026, 00:44:07

Amazing interior, sporty-funky exterior, great handles, good amount of power.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): City / Short distance
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Skoda Scala

The Skoda Scala is a tidy, no-nonsense hatch that wraps clever packaging and composed manners into a compact, grown-up package. It’s the sensible choice for buyers who want everyday practicality with a dash of style and personality—no drama, just reliable charm.

details
Der neue SKODA SCALA_114931
Der neue SKODA SCALA_114932
Der neue SKODA SCALA_114933
Der neue SKODA SCALA Interieur_114994

Reviews Skoda Scala

4.9 (7 Reviews)
rate
Jose Ant.
1 Feb 2026, 04:13:05

The Scala is roomier inside than it looks, and very agile on both the highway and in town — ideal for practical, family use. It also uses less fuel.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Frequently compared as well

MINI Aceman
Renault R5
VS
The MINI Aceman feels like a posh city rocket — cheeky handling, premium finishes and a slick interior make it the choice for drivers who want style and go‑kart fun wrapped in crossover practicality. The Renault 5, by contrast, pares back the flash for retro charm, more usable space and a …
Skoda Scala
VW Taigo
VS
In the battle of compact cars, the Skoda Scala and VW Taigo showcase distinct personalities while sharing the same platform. The Scala impresses with its spaciousness and practicality, making it an ideal choice for families, whereas the Taigo offers a sportier, coupe-inspired design that targets …
Skoda Scala
Kia K4
VS
The Skoda Scala and Kia K4 compete for the top spot in your garage. See how both models differ in key areas like performance, running costs, interior space and technology. A fast, clear comparison helps you pick the one that fits your needs best.
MINI Aceman
MINI Countryman
VS
In the latest showdown between the MINI Aceman and the MINI Countryman, drivers can expect a fresh take on the classic MINI experience. The Aceman offers a more compact design with an emphasis on electric performance, while the Countryman remains a versatile favorite with its spacious interior and …
Skoda Kamiq
Skoda Scala
VS
The Skoda Kamiq is a city‑friendly crossover that trades a bit of sportiness for higher seating, clever storage tricks and SUV looks — great if you want practical versatility and a confident view of the road. The Skoda Scala, meanwhile, is the sharper, more car‑like hatchback with better driving …
Hyundai i30
Skoda Scala
VS
The Hyundai i30 and Skoda Scala compete for the top spot in your garage. See how both models differ in key areas like performance, running costs, interior space and technology. A fast, clear comparison helps you pick the one that fits your needs best.
Skoda Octavia Combi
Skoda Scala
VS
The Skoda Octavia Combi and Skoda Scala compete for the top spot in your garage. See how both models differ in key areas like performance, running costs, interior space and technology. A fast, clear comparison helps you pick the one that fits your needs best.
Alpine A290
MINI Aceman
VS
Unsure whether the Alpine A290 or the MINI Aceman is the better match? Compare both models directly and discover differences in power, efficiency, comfort and value for money — all summarized in one easy view to support your decision.
MINI Aceman
Skoda Scala

Costs and Consumption
Price
27,000 - 36,400 £
Price
21,400 - 31,500 £
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption L/100km
5 - 5.6 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
14.1 - 16 kWh/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
309 - 355 km
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
0 g/km
co2
114 - 126 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
Hatchback
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,720 - 1,825 kg
Curb weight
1,199 - 1,271 kg
Trunk capacity
300 L
Trunk capacity
467 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,754 mm
Width
1,793 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
450 - 530 kg
Payload
403 - 431 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Electric
Engine Type
Petrol
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
184 - 258 HP
Power HP
95 - 150 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.4 - 7.9 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.2 - 10.8 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
290 - 350 Nm
Torque
175 - 250 Nm
Number of Cylinders
-
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
Power kW
135 - 190 kW
Power kW
70 - 110 kW
Engine capacity
-
Engine capacity
999 - 1,498 cm3

General
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
Model Year
2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
CO2 Efficiency Class
C, D
Brand
MINI
Brand
Skoda
What drive types are available for the MINI Aceman?

Available configurations include Front-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.