VS

Mitsubishi ASX vs Renault Trafic Transporter comparison

Compare performance (158 HP vs 170 HP), boot space and price (21,800 £ vs 38,100 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mitsubishi ASX or Renault Trafic Transporter?

Mitsubishi ASX vs Renault Trafic Transporter: Key differences

Mitsubishi ASX

4.9 (2 Reviews)
rate
  • significantly cheaper
  • considerably more efficient
  • noticeably quicker 0–100 km/h
  • considerably lighter
details

Renault Trafic Transporter

  • only slightly more power
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

ASX

Costs and Efficiency:

When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.

Mitsubishi ASX is significantly cheaper – starting at 21,800 £ , while the Renault Trafic Transporter costs 38,100 £ . That’s a price difference of around 16,335 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Mitsubishi ASX uses 4.3 L/100km and is considerably more efficient than the Renault Trafic Transporter with 6.8 L/100km. The difference is about 2.5 L/100km.

Trafic Transporter

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the Renault Trafic Transporter offers only slightly more power – delivering 170 HP compared to 158 HP. That’s roughly 12 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Mitsubishi ASX is noticeably quicker – completing the sprint in 8.9 s, while the Renault Trafic Transporter takes 10.8 s. That’s about 1.9 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Renault Trafic Transporter delivers noticeably more torque with 380 Nm compared to 245 Nm. That’s about 135 Nm more.

ASX

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Seats: Renault Trafic Transporter offers more seats – 6 vs 5.

In terms of curb weight, Mitsubishi ASX is considerably lighter – 1,296 kg compared to 1,848 kg. The difference is around 552 kg.

When it comes to payload, the Renault Trafic Transporter carries clearly more – 1,222 kg compared to 445 kg. That’s a difference of about 777 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Renault Trafic Transporter comes out clearly ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £38,100
Trafic Transporter

Renault Trafic Transporter

  • Engine Type Electric, Diesel
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 122 - 170 HP
  • Consumption L/100km 6.8 - 7 L/100km
  • Consumption kWh/100km 21.2 - 22.2 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range 240 - 318 km
Mitsubishi ASX
Renault Trafic Transporter

Costs and Consumption

View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance

View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body

View detailed analysis

Mitsubishi ASX

The Mitsubishi ASX is a compact crossover that mixes practicality with a no-nonsense personality, making it an easy choice for buyers who want sensible space without the showroom theatrics. It won't set your pulse racing, but its composed ride and user-friendly kit make it a dependable companion for daily errands and weekend escapes — reliable rather than flashy.

details

Renault Trafic Transporter

The Renault Trafic is a practical, workhorse transporter that hides thoughtful cabin comfort behind a tough, utilitarian exterior, so you can tackle a busy week without sacrificing sanity. It’s a sensible choice for buyers who want reliability and clever flexibility rather than flash, with just enough character to make daily hauling feel less like a chore.

details
Mitsubishi ASX
Renault Trafic Transporter

Costs and Consumption

Price
21,800 - 32,700 £
Price
38,100 - 43,500 £
Consumption L/100km
4.3 - 6 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
6.8 - 7 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
21.2 - 22.2 kWh/100km
Electric Range
-
Electric Range
240 - 318 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
99 - 136 g/km
co2
0 - 184 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body

Body Type
SUV
Body Type
Cargo Van
Seats
5
Seats
3 - 6
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,296 - 1,493 kg
Curb weight
1,848 - 2,075 kg
Trunk capacity
348 - 484 L
Trunk capacity
-
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,797 mm
Width
1,956 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
397 - 445 kg
Payload
899 - 1,222 kg

Engine and Performance

Engine Type
Petrol, Petrol MHEV, Full Hybrid
Engine Type
Electric, Diesel
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic, Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
115 - 158 HP
Power HP
122 - 170 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.9 - 12.3 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
10.8 - 13.6 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
190 - 245 Nm
Torque
245 - 380 Nm
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
84 - 116 kW
Power kW
90 - 125 kW
Engine capacity
1,199 - 1,789 cm3
Engine capacity
1,997 cm3

General

Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
Model Year
2,023 - 2,025
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E, C
CO2 Efficiency Class
A, G
Brand
Mitsubishi
Brand
Renault
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.