VS

Mitsubishi ASX vs VW T-Cross comparison

Compare performance (158 HP vs 150 HP), boot space and price (21400 £ vs 21400 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mitsubishi ASX or VW T-Cross?

Mitsubishi ASX vs VW T-Cross: Key differences

Mitsubishi ASX

5 (1 Reviews)
rate
  • slight more power
  • distinct more efficient
  • hardly perceptible more trunk space

VW T-Cross

4.5 (2 Reviews)
rate
  • barely noticeable cheaper
  • hardly perceptible quicker from 0–100 km/h
  • hardly perceptible lighter

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

ASX

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.

VW T-Cross has a barely noticeable advantage in terms of price – it starts at 21400 £ , while the Mitsubishi ASX costs 21400 £ . That’s a price difference of around 26 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Mitsubishi ASX manages with 4.40 L and is therefore distinct more efficient than the VW T-Cross with 5.40 L. The difference is about 1 L per 100 km.

T-Cross

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the Mitsubishi ASX has a slight edge – offering 158 HP compared to 150 HP. That’s roughly 8 HP more horsepower.

In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the VW T-Cross is hardly perceptible quicker – completing the sprint in 8.40 s, while the Mitsubishi ASX takes 8.90 s. That’s about 0.50 s faster.

There’s also a difference in torque: VW T-Cross pulls minimal stronger with 250 Nm compared to 245 Nm. That’s about 5 Nm difference.

ASX

Space and Everyday Use:

Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In curb weight, VW T-Cross is hardly perceptible lighter – 1267 kg compared to 1296 kg. The difference is around 29 kg.

In terms of boot space, the Mitsubishi ASX offers hardly perceptible more room – 484 L compared to 455 L. That’s a difference of about 29 L.

When it comes to payload, VW T-Cross hardly perceptible takes the win – 480 kg compared to 445 kg. That’s a difference of about 35 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Mitsubishi ASX is clearly superior overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

Frequently compared as well

VW Polo
VW T-Cross
VS
The VW Polo is a nimble, wallet-friendly hatch that makes city driving and tight parking effortless, while the VW T-Cross trades the Polo’s sprightliness for SUV practicality — higher seating, a roomier boot and a more commanding road presence. Pick the Polo if you want cheap, lively motoring; …
SEAT Arona
VW T-Cross
VS
The SEAT Arona and VW T‑Cross duke it out in the small SUV ring: the Arona brings punchy styling and a driver-focused feel, while the T‑Cross leans on roomy practicality and Volkswagen calm. Pick the Arona for a bit more sparkle and sporty character, or the T‑Cross if cargo space, refinement and …
Mitsubishi ASX
VW T-Cross

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
from about £21,400
ASX

Mitsubishi ASX

  • Engine Type : Full Hybrid, Petrol, Petrol MHEV
  • Transmission : Automatic, Manuel
  • Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 115 - 158 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 4.4 - 6 L
details

Mitsubishi ASX

5 (1 Reviews)
rate

The Mitsubishi ASX is a compact crossover that mixes practicality with a no-nonsense personality, making it an easy choice for buyers who want sensible space without the showroom theatrics. It won't set your pulse racing, but its composed ride and user-friendly kit make it a dependable companion for daily errands and weekend escapes — reliable rather than flashy.

details
23MY_ASX_PHEV_Instyle_PR-image_driving_front_variation_low
23MY_ASX_PHEV_Instyle_PR-image_driving_rear_variation_low
23MY_ASX_PHEV_Instyle_PR-image_interior_low
23MY_ASX_PHEV_Instyle_Overview-Trunk_open_low

VW T-Cross

4.5 (2 Reviews)
rate

The VW T-Cross turns everyday practicality into a style statement, offering a roomy-feeling cabin, clever storage and playful design that suits town life and family duties alike. On the road it's composed and relaxed, rewarding buyers who want the raised seating and confident presence of an SUV without the weighty compromises.

details
DB2021AU01108_medium
DB2021AU01109_medium
DB2021AU01111_medium
DB2021AU01114_medium
DB2021AU01120_medium
DB2021AU01124_medium

Reviews Mitsubishi ASX

5 (1 Reviews)
rate

Reviews VW T-Cross

4.5 (2 Reviews)
rate
Monika
12 Feb 2026, 07:34:19

I chose the T‑Cross — more comfortable and roomier inside, especially for adult passengers; bought on the model‑year clearance — running costs work out cheaper even taking into account fuel savings from the Toyota hybrid (planned over five years); I like the space and the VW suited me better — I prefer the view through the front windshield.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Erasmo Paone
21 Oct 2025, 21:49:59

Very practical, interior space is excellent. Lacks charm, fuel consumption is a bit high.

Mitsubishi ASX
VW T-Cross

Costs and Consumption
Price
21400 - 32500 £
Price
21400 - 32000 £
Consumption L/100km
4.4 - 6 L
Consumption L/100km
5.4 - 6 L
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
-
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
99 - 137 g/km
co2
124 - 136 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
1296 - 1493 kg
Curb weight
1267 - 1338 kg
Trunk capacity
348 - 484 L
Trunk capacity
455 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1797 mm
Width
1784 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
397 - 445 kg
Payload
463 - 480 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Full Hybrid, Petrol, Petrol MHEV
Engine Type
Petrol
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox, Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
115 - 158 HP
Power HP
95 - 150 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.9 - 12.3 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.4 - 11.3 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
190 - 245 Nm
Torque
175 - 250 Nm
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
Power kW
84 - 116 kW
Power kW
70 - 110 kW
Engine capacity
1199 - 1789 cm3
Engine capacity
999 - 1498 cm3

General
Model Year
2025
Model Year
2024 - 2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
C, D, E
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E
Brand
Mitsubishi
Brand
VW

Similar Comparisons

Renault Captur
VW T-Cross
VS
In the compact crossover showdown, the Renault Captur dazzles with bold styling, quirky customization and clever interior tricks, while the VW T-Cross takes a quieter route—solid build, practical space and no-nonsense usability. Choose the Captur if you want personality and fun; pick the T‑Cross if …
Toyota Yaris Cross
VW T-Cross
VS
The Toyota Yaris Cross sails ahead with brilliant hybrid economy, city-sized agility and Toyota’s trademark reliability, while the VW T‑Cross scores for sensible packaging, a bigger boot and a more grown-up driving feel. If you live in town and worship low fuel bills pick the Yaris Cross; if you …
VW T-Cross
VW Taigo
VS
Unsure whether the VW T-Cross or the VW Taigo is the better match? Compare both models directly and discover differences in power, efficiency, comfort and value for money — all summarized in one easy view to support your decision.
Ford Puma
VW T-Cross
VS
In the battle of compact crossovers, the Ford Puma showcases a sporty design and dynamic handling, appealing to those who crave a fun driving experience. Meanwhile, the VW T-Cross emphasizes practicality and interior space, making it a top choice for families seeking comfort on the road. Both …
Suzuki Vitara
VW T-Cross
VS
In this showdown between the Suzuki Vitara and VW T-Cross, both compact SUVs offer distinct advantages for urban and adventurous drivers alike. The Vitara impresses with its robust off-road capabilities and generous interior space, while the T-Cross shines with its stylish design and advanced tech …
VW T-Cross
VW T-Roc
VS
In the battle of compact SUVs, the VW T-Cross and VW T-Roc showcase distinct personalities, catering to different preferences. The T-Cross excels in urban agility and practical, family-friendly features, while the T-Roc leans towards a sportier design and a more engaging driving experience. Both …
Mitsubishi ASX
Renault Captur
VS
In this exciting comparison between the Mitsubishi Outlander and the Renault Koleos, both models showcase their strengths in versatility and design. The Outlander impresses with its robust performance and spacious interior, making it an ideal choice for families and adventure seekers alike. …
Audi Q2
VW T-Cross
VS
In the compact SUV segment, the Audi Q2 and VW T-Cross offer distinct personalities, catering to varying consumer preferences. The Q2 boasts a more premium feel with its upscale interior and engaging driving dynamics, while the T-Cross provides practicality with its spacious cabin and impressive …
What drive types are available for the Mitsubishi ASX?

Available configurations include Front-Wheel Drive.

The prices shown are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted for local VAT. Local registration taxes (e.g. NoVA, BPM or CO2 malus) are not included. This information is not legally binding.