VS

Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross vs KGM Torres EVX comparison

Compare performance (218 HP vs 207 HP), boot space and price (41,100 £ vs 33,400 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross or KGM Torres EVX?

Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross vs KGM Torres EVX: Key differences

Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross

4.9 (2 Reviews)
rate
  • marginally more power
  • moderately more efficient
  • a bit more electric range
  • only slightly quicker 0–100 km/h
  • barely lighter
details

KGM Torres EVX

  • noticeably cheaper
  • markedly more trunk space
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Eclipse Cross

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.

KGM Torres EVX is noticeably cheaper – starting at 33,400 £ , while the Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross costs 41,100 £ . That’s a price difference of around 7,714 £.

In terms of energy consumption, the Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross is moderately more efficient: consuming 16.7 kWh/100km compared to 19.3 kWh/100km for the KGM Torres EVX. That’s a difference of about 2.6 kWh/100km.

As for electric range, the Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross offers a bit more range – reaching up to 627 km, about 124 km more than the KGM Torres EVX.

Torres EVX

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross offers marginally more power – delivering 218 HP compared to 207 HP. That’s roughly 11 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross is only slightly quicker – completing the sprint in 7.9 s, while the KGM Torres EVX takes 8.2 s. That’s about 0.3 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the KGM Torres EVX delivers slightly more torque with 339 Nm compared to 300 Nm. That’s about 39 Nm more.

Eclipse Cross

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross is barely lighter – 1,922 kg compared to 1,925 kg. The difference is around 3 kg.

Looking at boot space, the KGM Torres EVX offers markedly more boot space – 703 L compared to 545 L. That’s a difference of about 158 L.

When it comes to payload, the KGM Torres EVX carries slightly more – 510 kg compared to 413 kg. That’s a difference of about 97 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The KGM Torres EVX has the upper hand in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £33,400
Torres EVX

KGM Torres EVX

  • Engine Type Electric
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 207 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km 19.3 - 19.7 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range 498 - 503 km
Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross
KGM Torres EVX

Costs and Consumption

View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance

View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body

View detailed analysis

Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross

Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross combines coupe-like looks with crossover practicality, so you get style without the showroom attitude. It’s an affable daily driver that hides a few quirks behind a confident grin, making it an easy pick for buyers who want personality without fuss.

details

KGM Torres EVX

The Torres EVX presents itself as a practical and polished electric SUV, pairing a spacious, comfortable interior with a clean, contemporary design. With composed road manners and user-friendly technology, it feels like a sensible choice for drivers seeking an everyday electric family vehicle.

details
Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross
KGM Torres EVX

Costs and Consumption

Price
41,100 - 48,200 £
Price
33,400 - 42,000 £
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
16.7 - 17.1 kWh/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
19.3 - 19.7 kWh/100km
Electric Range
615 - 627 km
Electric Range
498 - 503 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
0 g/km
co2
0 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body

Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
2 - 5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,922 - 1,950 kg
Curb weight
1,925 - 1,950 kg
Trunk capacity
545 L
Trunk capacity
703 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,908 mm
Width
1,890 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
385 - 413 kg
Payload
485 - 510 kg

Engine and Performance

Engine Type
Electric
Engine Type
Electric
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
218 HP
Power HP
207 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.9 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.2 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
300 Nm
Torque
339 Nm
Number of Cylinders
-
Number of Cylinders
-
Power kW
160 kW
Power kW
152 kW
Engine capacity
-
Engine capacity
-

General

Model Year
2025
Model Year
2026
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
Brand
Mitsubishi
Brand
KGM
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.