Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
Česko
EspañaVS
Ford Explorer EV vs KGM Torres EVX comparison
Compare performance (340 HP vs 207 HP), boot space and price (34,200 £ vs 33,400 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Explorer EV or KGM Torres EVX?
Ford Explorer EV vs KGM Torres EVX: Key differences
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
Explorer EV
Costs and Efficiency:
When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.
KGM Torres EVX is only slightly cheaper – starting at 33,400 £ , while the Ford Explorer EV costs 34,200 £ . That’s a price difference of around 780 £.
In terms of energy consumption, the Ford Explorer EV is visibly more efficient: consuming 14.6 kWh/100km compared to 19.3 kWh/100km for the KGM Torres EVX. That’s a difference of about 4.7 kWh/100km.
As for electric range, the Ford Explorer EV offers slightly more range – reaching up to 602 km, about 99 km more than the KGM Torres EVX.
Torres EVX
Engine and Performance:
Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.
When it comes to engine power, the Ford Explorer EV offers markedly more power – delivering 340 HP compared to 207 HP. That’s roughly 133 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Ford Explorer EV is significantly quicker – completing the sprint in 5.3 s, while the KGM Torres EVX takes 8.2 s. That’s about 2.9 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Ford Explorer EV delivers significantly more torque with 679 Nm compared to 339 Nm. That’s about 340 Nm more.
Explorer EV
Space and Everyday Use:
Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, KGM Torres EVX is marginally lighter – 1,925 kg compared to 1,996 kg. The difference is around 71 kg.
Looking at boot space, the KGM Torres EVX offers visibly more boot space – 703 L compared to 472 L. That’s a difference of about 231 L.
When it comes to payload, the Ford Explorer EV carries somewhat more – 585 kg compared to 510 kg. That’s a difference of about 75 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The Ford Explorer EV is clearly superior overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
from £34,200
Ford Explorer EV
Ford Explorer EV
KGM Torres EVX
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Ford Explorer EV
The Explorer EV brings the familiar presence and practicality of an Explorer into the electric age, offering roomy comfort and modern tech for everyday life and family trips. It feels composed on the road and serves as a straightforward, user-friendly alternative to conventional gas-powered SUVs.
details
KGM Torres EVX
The Torres EVX presents itself as a practical and polished electric SUV, pairing a spacious, comfortable interior with a clean, contemporary design. With composed road manners and user-friendly technology, it feels like a sensible choice for drivers seeking an everyday electric family vehicle.
details
Ford Explorer EV
KGM Torres EVX
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
34,200 - 49,600 £
|
Price
33,400 - 42,000 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
14.6 - 17.3 kWh/100km
|
Consumption kWh/100km
19.3 - 19.7 kWh/100km
|
|
Electric Range
417 - 602 km
|
Electric Range
498 - 503 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
0 g/km
|
co2
0 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
2 - 5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
1,996 - 2,209 kg
|
Curb weight
1,925 - 1,950 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
472 L
|
Trunk capacity
703 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,872 mm
|
Width
1,890 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
531 - 585 kg
|
Payload
485 - 510 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
190 - 340 HP
|
Power HP
207 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.3 - 8 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.2 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
350 - 679 Nm
|
Torque
339 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
|
Power kW
140 - 250 kW
|
Power kW
152 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
-
|
Engine capacity
-
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2026
|
Model Year
2026
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
|
Brand
Ford
|
Brand
KGM
|
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved.
The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.