VS

Mitsubishi Space Star vs Citroen C3 comparison

Compare performance (71 HP vs 113 HP), boot space and price (11,600 £ vs 14,000 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mitsubishi Space Star or Citroen C3?

Mitsubishi Space Star vs Citroen C3: Key differences

Mitsubishi Space Star

4.3 (2 Reviews)
rate
  • slightly cheaper
  • very slightly more efficient
  • clearly lighter
details

Citroen C3

4.9 (2 Reviews)
rate
  • noticeably more power
  • significantly quicker 0–100 km/h
  • visibly more trunk space
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Space Star

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.

Mitsubishi Space Star is slightly cheaper – starting at 11,600 £ , while the Citroen C3 costs 14,000 £ . That’s a price difference of around 2,314 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Mitsubishi Space Star uses 4.9 L/100km and is very slightly more efficient than the Citroen C3 with 5 L/100km. The difference is about 0.1 L/100km.

C3

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the Citroen C3 offers noticeably more power – delivering 113 HP compared to 71 HP. That’s roughly 42 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Citroen C3 is significantly quicker – completing the sprint in 9.9 s, while the Mitsubishi Space Star takes 14.1 s. That’s about 4.2 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Citroen C3 delivers substantially more torque with 205 Nm compared to 102 Nm. That’s about 103 Nm more.

Space Star

Space and Everyday Use:

Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Mitsubishi Space Star is clearly lighter – 940 kg compared to 1,226 kg. The difference is around 286 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Citroen C3 offers visibly more boot space – 310 L compared to 235 L. That’s a difference of about 75 L.

When it comes to payload, the Citroen C3 carries marginally more – 423 kg compared to 400 kg. That’s a difference of about 23 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Citroen C3 stands well ahead of its rival in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £14,000
C3

Citroen C3

  • Engine Type Electric, Petrol, Petrol MHEV
  • Transmission Automatic, Manuel
  • Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 101 - 113 HP
  • Consumption L/100km 5 - 5.6 L/100km
  • Consumption kWh/100km 16.7 - 17.2 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range 212 - 325 km
details

Frequently compared as well

Citroen C3
Citroen C3 Aircross
VS
Deciding between the Citroën C3 and the Citroën C3 Aircross is basically a choice between a compact, city-focused hatch and a taller, more practical crossover. The C3 prioritises nimble handling, simplicity and economy for urban driving, while the C3 Aircross adds higher ride height, extra interior …
Citroen C3
Opel Corsa
VS
The Citroën C3 charms with its quirky French flair, plush seats and a ride tuned more for comfort than cornering, while the Opel Corsa plays the sensible all-rounder with sharper handling, a tidier cabin and a broader engine lineup. If you want personality and city-friendly cushioning, pick the C3; …
Mitsubishi Space Star
Citroen C3

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Mitsubishi Space Star

The Mitsubishi Space Star is a tidy, no-nonsense city car that squeezes surprising interior space into a compact, easy-to-park package. It's not a thrill-seeker's toy, but for buyers after low running costs, fuss-free reliability and sensible day-to-day practicality, it's a clever and cheerful choice that keeps your wallet and nerves happy.

details
DSC_2683_low
DSC_6272_low
DSC_8755_low
050_low

Reviews Mitsubishi Space Star

4.3 (2 Reviews)
rate
Bernard
19 May 2026, 19:43:01

Mitsubishi is more reliable brand, also the mirage /space star is more Fuel efficient than dacia Sandero

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Citroen C3

The Citroën C3 is a stylish and practical small hatchback that puts comfort and a calm urban driving experience at the top of its list. With its distinctive looks and thoughtful interior touches, it suits buyers who want personality and everyday usability without drama.

details
CITROEN_C3_25
CITROEN_C3_26
CITROEN_C3_44
12D30_01

Reviews Citroen C3

4.9 (2 Reviews)
rate

No reviews yet. Share your experience and help others decide.

Frequently compared as well

Citroen C3
Jeep Avenger
VS
The Citroën C3 and the Jeep Avenger are two compact, city-focused crossovers that target buyers who want practicality, efficiency and a touch of personality. This quick comparison highlights their differences in ride comfort, interior space, fuel economy and features to help you pick the better fit …
Citroen C3
Renault Captur
VS
Choosing between the Citroën C3 and the Renault Captur comes down to whether you want a compact, comfort-focused hatch with quirky styling or a slightly larger, more versatile crossover with a higher driving position. I’ll compare practicality, fuel economy, driving feel and value so you can pick …
Citroen C3
Renault Clio
VS
City supermini buyers face a tasty dilemma: the Citroën C3 charms with cosy ride comfort, playful looks and practical flair, while the Renault Clio answers with sharper handling, a more premium cabin and smarter tech. Choose the C3 if you prioritise comfort and personality; pick the Clio if you …
Citroen C3
Citroen C4
VS
The Citroën C3 is the cheeky city hatch that charms with low running costs, soft suspension and easy parking, while the Citroën C4 stretches into crossover territory with more space, stronger engines and sharper tech. If you mostly nip around town grab the C3 for its thrift and comfort; if you want …
Citroen C3
DS Automobiles DS 3
VS
Citroen C3 and DS Automobiles DS 3 go head-to-head: compare performance, space, features and price in one quick overview to see which model suits your daily driving, budget and lifestyle better. A clear, side-by-side look helps you make the smarter choice. || Unsure whether the Citroen C3 or the …
Citroen C3
Peugeot 208
VS
Forget badge snobbery: the Citroën C3 is the comfy, quirky city car that soaks up potholes and prioritises practicality, while the Peugeot 208 feels sharper to drive with a more premium cabin and livelier engines. Pick the C3 for relaxed, characterful motoring and the 208 if you want style and …
Mitsubishi Colt
Mitsubishi Space Star
VS
In the competitive subcompact segment, the Mitsubishi Colt and Mitsubishi Space Star offer unique appeals to different drivers. The Colt shines with its sporty design and responsive handling, making it an exciting choice for urban driving. Meanwhile, the Space Star prioritizes practicality and fuel …
Citroen C3
Hyundai i10
VS
Choosing between the Citroën C3 and the Hyundai i10 comes down to whether you prefer the C3’s quirky styling and comfort-focused ride or the i10’s sharp practicality, compact agility and typically lower running costs. Both make excellent city cars — the C3 feels roomier and more distinctive, while …
Mitsubishi Space Star
Citroen C3

Costs and Consumption
Price
11,600 - 18,700 £
Price
14,000 - 24,700 £
Consumption L/100km
4.9 - 5.5 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
5 - 5.6 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
16.7 - 17.2 kWh/100km
Electric Range
-
Electric Range
212 - 325 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
112 - 125 g/km
co2
0 - 126 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
35 L
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
Hatchback
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
2 - 5
Doors
5
Doors
-
Curb weight
940 - 1,011 kg
Curb weight
1,226 - 1,518 kg
Trunk capacity
209 - 235 L
Trunk capacity
310 L
Length
3,845 mm
Length
-
Width
1,665 mm
Width
1,755 mm
Height
1,505 mm
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
881 - 912 L
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
359 - 400 kg
Payload
227 - 423 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Petrol
Engine Type
Electric, Petrol, Petrol MHEV
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, CVT
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox, Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
71 HP
Power HP
101 - 113 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
14.1 - 15.8 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
9.9 - 12 s
Max Speed
163 - 167 km/h
Max Speed
-
Torque
102 Nm
Torque
120 - 205 Nm
Number of Cylinders
3
Number of Cylinders
3
Power kW
52 kW
Power kW
74 - 83 kW
Engine capacity
1,193 cm3
Engine capacity
1,199 cm3

General
Model Year
2,020 - 2,022
Model Year
2,024 - 2,026
CO2 Efficiency Class
C, D
CO2 Efficiency Class
A, D, C
Brand
Mitsubishi
Brand
Citroen
What drivetrain options does the Mitsubishi Space Star have?

The Mitsubishi Space Star is available as Front-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.