VS

Mitsubishi Space Star vs Ford Mustang Convertible comparison

Compare performance (71 HP vs 446 HP), boot space and price (11,600 £ vs 56,900 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mitsubishi Space Star or Ford Mustang Convertible?

Mitsubishi Space Star vs Ford Mustang Convertible: Key differences

Mitsubishi Space Star

3.8 (1 Reviews)
rate
  • clearly cheaper
  • substantially more efficient
  • substantially lighter
details

Ford Mustang Convertible

  • significantly more power
  • substantially quicker 0–100 km/h
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Space Star

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.

Mitsubishi Space Star is clearly cheaper – starting at 11,600 £ , while the Ford Mustang Convertible costs 56,900 £ . That’s a price difference of around 45,266 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Mitsubishi Space Star uses 4.9 L/100km and is substantially more efficient than the Ford Mustang Convertible with 12.3 L/100km. The difference is about 7.4 L/100km.

Mustang Convertible

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the Ford Mustang Convertible offers significantly more power – delivering 446 HP compared to 71 HP. That’s roughly 375 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Ford Mustang Convertible is substantially quicker – completing the sprint in 5 s, while the Mitsubishi Space Star takes 14.1 s. That’s about 9.1 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Ford Mustang Convertible delivers clearly more torque with 540 Nm compared to 102 Nm. That’s about 438 Nm more.

Space Star

Space and Everyday Use:

Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?

Seats: Mitsubishi Space Star offers more seats – 5 vs 4.

In terms of curb weight, Mitsubishi Space Star is substantially lighter – 940 kg compared to 1,876 kg. The difference is around 936 kg.

When it comes to payload, the Mitsubishi Space Star carries slightly more – 400 kg compared to 324 kg. That’s a difference of about 76 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Mitsubishi Space Star is clearly superior overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £11,600
Space Star

Mitsubishi Space Star

  • Engine Type Petrol
  • Transmission Manuel, Automatic
  • Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 71 HP
  • Consumption L/100km 4.9 - 5.5 L/100km
Mitsubishi Space Star
Ford Mustang Convertible

Costs and Consumption

View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance

View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body

View detailed analysis

Mitsubishi Space Star

The Mitsubishi Space Star is a tidy, no-nonsense city car that squeezes surprising interior space into a compact, easy-to-park package. It's not a thrill-seeker's toy, but for buyers after low running costs, fuss-free reliability and sensible day-to-day practicality, it's a clever and cheerful choice that keeps your wallet and nerves happy.

details

Ford Mustang Convertible

The Ford Mustang Convertible makes every drive feel like a small celebration, its exhaust note and open-air drama turning mundane routes into showstoppers. It’s a car that doubles as a weekend mood lifter and a credible everyday companion, blending swagger with surprising practicality.

details
Mitsubishi Space Star
Ford Mustang Convertible

Costs and Consumption

Price
11,600 - 18,700 £
Price
56,900 - 59,900 £
Consumption L/100km
4.9 - 5.5 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
12.3 - 12.4 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
-
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
112 - 125 g/km
co2
280 - 282 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
35 L
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body

Body Type
Hatchback
Body Type
Convertible
Seats
5
Seats
4
Doors
5
Doors
-
Curb weight
940 - 1,011 kg
Curb weight
1,876 kg
Trunk capacity
209 - 235 L
Trunk capacity
-
Length
3,845 mm
Length
-
Width
1,665 mm
Width
1,916 mm
Height
1,505 mm
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
881 - 912 L
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
359 - 400 kg
Payload
319 - 324 kg

Engine and Performance

Engine Type
Petrol
Engine Type
Petrol
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, CVT
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive
Power HP
71 HP
Power HP
446 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
14.1 - 15.8 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5 - 5.4 s
Max Speed
163 - 167 km/h
Max Speed
-
Torque
102 Nm
Torque
540 Nm
Number of Cylinders
3
Number of Cylinders
8
Power kW
52 kW
Power kW
328 kW
Engine capacity
1,193 cm3
Engine capacity
5,038 cm3

General

Model Year
2,020 - 2,022
Model Year
2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
C, D
CO2 Efficiency Class
G
Brand
Mitsubishi
Brand
Ford
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.