VS

Mitsubishi Space Star vs Renault Clio - Differences and prices compared

Compare performance (71 HP vs 158 HP), boot space and price (11600 £ vs 16600 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mitsubishi Space Star or Renault Clio?

Mitsubishi Space Star

Renault Clio

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Space Star

Costs and Efficiency:

Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.

Mitsubishi Space Star has a convincingly advantage in terms of price – it starts at 11600 £ , while the Renault Clio costs 16600 £ . That’s a price difference of around 4937 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Renault Clio manages with 4.10 L and is therefore slightly more efficient than the Mitsubishi Space Star with 4.90 L. The difference is about 0.80 L per 100 km.

Clio

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the Renault Clio has a decisively edge – offering 158 HP compared to 71 HP. That’s roughly 87 HP more horsepower.

In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Renault Clio is decisively quicker – completing the sprint in 8.30 s, while the Mitsubishi Space Star takes 14.10 s. That’s about 5.80 s faster.

In terms of top speed, the Renault Clio performs hardly perceptible better – reaching 180 km/h, while the Mitsubishi Space Star tops out at 167 km/h. The difference is around 13 km/h.

There’s also a difference in torque: Renault Clio pulls convincingly stronger with 205 Nm compared to 102 Nm. That’s about 103 Nm difference.

Space Star

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In curb weight, Mitsubishi Space Star is slightly lighter – 940 kg compared to 1124 kg. The difference is around 184 kg.

In terms of boot space, the Renault Clio offers noticeable more room – 391 L compared to 235 L. That’s a difference of about 156 L.

In maximum load capacity, the Renault Clio performs clearly perceptible better – up to 1176 L, which is about 264 L more than the Mitsubishi Space Star.

When it comes to payload, Renault Clio a bit takes the win – 463 kg compared to 400 kg. That’s a difference of about 63 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Renault Clio is clearly superior overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

Mitsubishi Space Star
Renault Clio

Costs and Consumption

View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance

View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body

View detailed analysis
from about £16,600
Clio

Renault Clio

  • Engine Type : Full Hybrid, Petrol
  • Transmission : Automatic, Manuel
  • Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 67 - 158 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 4.1 - 5.3 L

Mitsubishi Space Star

The Mitsubishi Space Star is a tidy, no-nonsense city car that squeezes surprising interior space into a compact, easy-to-park package. It's not a thrill-seeker's toy, but for buyers after low running costs, fuss-free reliability and sensible day-to-day practicality, it's a clever and cheerful choice that keeps your wallet and nerves happy.

details

Renault Clio

The Clio punches above its weight with chic French styling and a surprisingly grown-up cabin that makes city driving feel effortlessly stylish. It's an easy-to-live-with choice that keeps ownership simple and even manages to put a grin on your face when the traffic gets dull.

details
Mitsubishi Space Star
Renault Clio

Costs and Consumption

Price
11600 - 18700 £
Price
16600 - 23700 £
Consumption L/100km
4.9 - 5.5 L
Consumption L/100km
4.1 - 5.3 L
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
-
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
0.60 kWh
co2
112 - 125 g/km
co2
92 - 121 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
35 L
Fuel tank capacity
39 - 42 L

Dimensions and Body

Body Type
Hatchback
Body Type
Hatchback
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
5
Doors
5
Curb weight
940 - 1011 kg
Curb weight
1124 - 1331 kg
Trunk capacity
209 - 235 L
Trunk capacity
301 - 391 L
Length
3845 mm
Length
4053 - 4116 mm
Width
1665 mm
Width
1768 - 1798 mm
Height
1505 mm
Height
1440 - 1451 mm
Max trunk capacity
881 - 912 L
Max trunk capacity
979 - 1176 L
Payload
359 - 400 kg
Payload
398 - 463 kg

Engine and Performance

Engine Type
Petrol
Engine Type
Full Hybrid, Petrol
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, CVT
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox, Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
71 HP
Power HP
67 - 158 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
14.1 - 15.8 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.3 - 17.1 s
Max Speed
163 - 167 km/h
Max Speed
160 - 180 km/h
Torque
102 Nm
Torque
95 - 205 Nm
Number of Cylinders
3
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
Power kW
52 kW
Power kW
49 - 116 kW
Engine capacity
1193 cm3
Engine capacity
999 - 1789 cm3

General

Model Year
2020 - 2022
Model Year
2023 - 2026
CO2 Efficiency Class
C, D
CO2 Efficiency Class
C, D, B
Brand
Mitsubishi
Brand
Renault
What drivetrain options does the Mitsubishi Space Star have?

Available configurations include Front-Wheel Drive.

The prices shown are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted for local VAT. Local registration taxes (e.g. NoVA, BPM or CO2 malus) are not included. This information is not legally binding.