VS

Mitsubishi Space Star vs Renault Clio – Which car suits you better?

Two cars, one duel: Mitsubishi Space Star meets Renault Clio.
Which one wins in performance, efficiency and value for money? Find out now!

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Costs and Efficiency:

Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.

Mitsubishi Space Star has a convincingly advantage in terms of price – it starts at 11600 £, while the Renault Clio costs 16600 £. That’s a price difference of around 4937 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Renault Clio manages with 4.30 L and is therefore slightly more efficient than the Mitsubishi Space Star with 4.90 L. The difference is about 0.60 L per 100 km.

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the Renault Clio has a decisively edge – offering 143 HP compared to 71 HP. That’s roughly 72 HP more horsepower.

In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Renault Clio is decisively quicker – completing the sprint in 9.30 s, while the Mitsubishi Space Star takes 14.10 s. That’s about 4.80 s faster.

In terms of top speed, the Renault Clio performs hardly perceptible better – reaching 174 km/h, while the Mitsubishi Space Star tops out at 167 km/h. The difference is around 7 km/h.

There’s also a difference in torque: Renault Clio pulls convincingly stronger with 205 Nm compared to 102 Nm. That’s about 103 Nm difference.

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In curb weight, Mitsubishi Space Star is slightly lighter – 940 kg compared to 1124 kg. The difference is around 184 kg.

In terms of boot space, the Renault Clio offers noticeable more room – 391 L compared to 235 L. That’s a difference of about 156 L.

In maximum load capacity, the Renault Clio performs a bit better – up to 1069 L, which is about 157 L more than the Mitsubishi Space Star.

When it comes to payload, Renault Clio hardly perceptible takes the win – 406 kg compared to 400 kg. That’s a difference of about 6 kg.

Who comes out on top?

Overall, the Renault Clio shows itself to be dominates this comparison and secures the title of DriveDuel Champion.
It convinces with the more balanced overall package and proves to be the more versatile choice for everyday use.

from about £16,600
r212202p

Renault Clio

  • Engine Type : Full Hybrid, Petrol
  • Transmission : Automatic, Manuel
  • Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 67 - 143 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 4.3 - 5.3 L
details

Mitsubishi Space Star

The Mitsubishi Space Star offers a compact yet surprisingly spacious experience, making it an ideal choice for urban dwellers who need agility and comfort. Its sleek design is complemented by a range of vibrant colour options, adding a touch of flair to everyday commutes. With a focus on efficiency and practicality, the Space Star combines a user-friendly interface with modern technology to ensure a smooth driving experience.

details
DSC_2683_low @ presse.mitsubishi-motors.de
DSC_6272_low @ presse.mitsubishi-motors.de
DSC_8755_low @ presse.mitsubishi-motors.de
050_low @ presse.mitsubishi-motors.de

Renault Clio

The Renault Clio continues to impress with its sleek design and agile handling, making it a standout choice in the compact car segment. Inside, it offers a surprisingly spacious and comfortable cabin, crafted with high-quality materials that enhance the driving experience. Its fuel efficiency and reliable performance make it an attractive option for both city commuting and longer journeys.

details
r212202p @ renault-presse.de
r212188p @ renault-presse.de
r212211p @ renault-presse.de

Similar Comparisons

Citroen C3
Renault Clio
VS
In the battle of the superminis, the Citroën C3 and Renault Clio each bring their unique flair to the table. The C3 impresses with its distinctive design and customizable features, attracting those who prioritize style and individuality. Meanwhile, the Clio excels in driving dynamics and interior quality, making it a strong contender for those seeking a blend of practicality and performance.
MG MG3
Renault Clio
VS
In the battle of budget-friendly hatchbacks, the MG3 takes on the Renault Clio, offering an impressive mix of practicality and style for the price-conscious consumer. While the Clio boasts a more refined interior and a well-established reputation, the MG3 stands out with its generous warranty and eye-catching design. Ultimately, the choice may come down to personal preference, as both models deliver unique strengths in this competitive segment.
Mitsubishi Space Star
Renault Clio
Space Star
Clio

Costs and Consumption
Price
11600 - 18700 £
Price
16600 - 23000 £
Consumption L/100km
4.9 - 5.5 L
Consumption L/100km
4.3 - 5.3 L
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
-
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
0.60 kWh
co2
112 - 125 g/km
co2
97 - 121 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
35 L
Fuel tank capacity
39 - 42 L

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
Hatchback
Body Type
Hatchback
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
5
Doors
5
Curb weight
940 - 1011 kg
Curb weight
1124 - 1331 kg
Trunk capacity
209 - 235 L
Trunk capacity
301 - 391 L
Length
3845 mm
Length
4053 mm
Width
1665 mm
Width
1798 mm
Height
1505 mm
Height
1440 mm
Max trunk capacity
881 - 912 L
Max trunk capacity
979 - 1069 L
Payload
359 - 400 kg
Payload
398 - 406 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Petrol
Engine Type
Full Hybrid, Petrol
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, CVT
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox, Manual Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
71 HP
Power HP
67 - 143 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
14.1 - 15.8 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
9.3 - 17.1 s
Max Speed
163 - 167 km/h
Max Speed
160 - 174 km/h
Torque
102 Nm
Torque
95 - 205 Nm
Number of Cylinders
3
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
Power kW
52 kW
Power kW
49 - 105 kW
Engine capacity
1193 cm3
Engine capacity
999 - 1598 cm3

General
Model Year
2020 - 2022
Model Year
2023 - 2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
C, D
CO2 Efficiency Class
C, D
Brand
Mitsubishi
Brand
Renault

Similar Comparisons

Hyundai i10
Renault Clio
VS
In the competitive realm of compact cars, the Hyundai i10 stands out with its impressive maneuverability and surprising interior space, making it an ideal choice for urban drivers. Meanwhile, the Renault Clio captivates with its stylish design and advanced technology features, offering a more premium feel for those seeking a blend of comfort and agility. Ultimately, both models cater to different preferences, showcasing the diverse appeal within the subcompact segment.
Hyundai i20
Renault Clio
VS
In the competitive segment of compact hatchbacks, the Hyundai i20 and Renault Clio stand out with distinctive attributes. The Hyundai i20 impresses with its tech-laden interior and efficient performance, making it a practical choice for tech-savvy drivers. Meanwhile, the Renault Clio offers a blend of chic European design and agile handling, appealing to those seeking style and engaging driving dynamics.
Renault Clio
SEAT Ibiza
VS
In the showdown between the Renault Clio and the SEAT Ibiza, both hatchbacks bring impressive credentials to the table, vying for leadership in the compact car segment. The Renault Clio continues to charm with its chic design and cutting-edge technology, providing a driving experience that balances comfort and fun. On the other hand, the SEAT Ibiza stands out with its sporty demeanor and agile handling, appealing to those who value a dynamic ride in a compact package.
Renault Clio
Skoda Fabia
VS
In the ongoing battle of compact hatchbacks, the Renault Clio and Skoda Fabia have both staked their claim for supremacy. The Clio boasts a stylish design and a reputation for comfort, often appealing to those who prioritize aesthetics and innovative tech in their daily drive. Meanwhile, the Fabia stands out with its practicality and generous interior space, making it an attractive choice for drivers who demand reliability and functionality.
Renault Captur
Renault Clio
VS
In the ever-popular Renault Captur versus Renault Clio showdown, drivers can expect distinct advantages in both compact versatility and sporty handling. The Captur shines with its higher driving position and spacious interior, making it ideal for urban adventures and family outings. Meanwhile, the Clio impresses with its agile performance and stylish design, catering to those who prioritize a dynamic driving experience.
Renault Clio
Toyota Yaris
VS
The Renault Clio and Toyota Yaris both stand out in the compact car segment, each offering distinct advantages for urban driving. The Clio impresses with its stylish design and exceptional fuel efficiency, appealing to those who prioritize aesthetics and running costs. Meanwhile, the Yaris shines with its advanced hybrid technology and Toyota's reputation for reliability, making it a strong choice for tech-savvy drivers who value a lower carbon footprint.
Fiat 600
Renault Clio
VS
In the battle of compact city cars, the Fiat 600 and Renault Clio showcase distinct personalities that cater to different drivers. The Fiat 600 boasts a retro charm with its distinctive design and nimble handling, perfect for urban adventures. In contrast, the Renault Clio offers a more modern approach with its advanced tech features and spacious interior, making it an excellent choice for those prioritizing comfort and connectivity.
Renault Clio
Renault R5
VS
What drivetrain options does the Mitsubishi Space Star have?

Available configurations include Front-Wheel Drive.

The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.