Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
EspañaVS
Nissan Ariya vs Lynk & Co 02 comparison
Compare performance (435 HP vs 272 HP), boot space and price (37,300 £ vs 30,900 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Nissan Ariya or Lynk & Co 02?
Ariya
Costs and Efficiency:
Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.
Lynk & Co 02 is visibly cheaper – starting at 30,900 £ , while the Nissan Ariya costs 37,300 £ . That’s a price difference of around 6,425 £.
In terms of energy consumption, the Lynk & Co 02 is marginally more efficient: consuming 17.1 kWh/100km compared to 17.7 kWh/100km for the Nissan Ariya. That’s a difference of about 0.6 kWh/100km.
As for electric range, the Nissan Ariya offers somewhat more range – reaching up to 531 km, about 86 km more than the Lynk & Co 02.
02
Engine and Performance:
Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.
When it comes to engine power, the Nissan Ariya offers markedly more power – delivering 435 HP compared to 272 HP. That’s roughly 163 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Nissan Ariya is only slightly quicker – completing the sprint in 5 s, while the Lynk & Co 02 takes 5.5 s. That’s about 0.5 s quicker.
Looking at top speed, the Nissan Ariya is barely faster – reaching 200 km/h, while the Lynk & Co 02 tops out at 180 km/h. The difference is around 20 km/h.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Nissan Ariya delivers substantially more torque with 600 Nm compared to 323 Nm. That’s about 277 Nm more.
Ariya
Space and Everyday Use:
Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, Lynk & Co 02 is marginally lighter – 1,895 kg compared to 1,980 kg. The difference is around 85 kg.
Looking at boot space, the Nissan Ariya offers somewhat more boot space – 468 L compared to 410 L. That’s a difference of about 58 L.
For maximum load capacity, the Nissan Ariya offers barely more capacity – up to 1,350 L, about 1 L more than the Lynk & Co 02.
When it comes to payload, the Nissan Ariya carries somewhat more – 420 kg compared to 375 kg. That’s a difference of about 45 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The Nissan Ariya stands well ahead of its rival in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
from £37,300
Nissan Ariya
Nissan Ariya
Lynk & Co 02
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Nissan Ariya
The Nissan Ariya wraps futuristic, sculpted styling around a calm, high-tech cabin, making the switch to electric feel surprisingly easy and grown-up. It’s a comfortable, sensible EV that favors everyday usability and clever packaging over headline-grabbing theatrics — ideal for buyers who want an elegant, low-fuss electric car without the ego.
details
Lynk & Co 02
The Lynk & Co 02 wears its attitude like a leather jacket—bold styling and a youthful cabin that punches above its class, appealing to buyers who want personality as well as practicality. It's a genuinely engaging compact with everyday usability, offering enough flair and refinement to stand out in a crowded market without trying too hard.
details
Nissan Ariya
Lynk & Co 02
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
37,300 - 54,800 £
|
Price
30,900 - 34,300 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
17.7 - 24.5 kWh/100km
|
Consumption kWh/100km
17.1 - 17.6 kWh/100km
|
|
Electric Range
402 - 531 km
|
Electric Range
435 - 445 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
63 - 87 kWh
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
0 g/km
|
co2
0 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
1,980 - 2,277 kg
|
Curb weight
1,895 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
415 - 468 L
|
Trunk capacity
410 L
|
|
Length
4,595 mm
|
Length
4,460 mm
|
|
Width
1,850 mm
|
Width
1,845 mm
|
|
Height
1,650 mm
|
Height
1,573 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1,280 - 1,350 L
|
Max trunk capacity
1,349 L
|
|
Payload
363 - 420 kg
|
Payload
375 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
218 - 435 HP
|
Power HP
272 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5 - 7.6 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.5 s
|
|
Max Speed
160 - 200 km/h
|
Max Speed
180 km/h
|
|
Torque
300 - 600 Nm
|
Torque
323 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
|
Power kW
160 - 320 kW
|
Power kW
200 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
-
|
Engine capacity
-
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2,022 - 2,025
|
Model Year
2,024
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
|
Brand
Nissan
|
Brand
Lynk & Co
|
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved.
The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.