VS

Nissan Interstar vs Mitsubishi Space Star comparison

Compare performance (170 HP vs 71 HP), boot space and price (34,900 £ vs 11,600 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Nissan Interstar or Mitsubishi Space Star?

Nissan Interstar vs Mitsubishi Space Star: Key differences

Nissan Interstar

  • significantly more power

Mitsubishi Space Star

  • significantly cheaper
  • clearly more efficient
  • considerably lighter

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Interstar

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.

Mitsubishi Space Star is significantly cheaper – starting at 11,600 £ , while the Nissan Interstar costs 34,900 £ . That’s a price difference of around 23,287 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Mitsubishi Space Star uses 4.9 L/100km and is clearly more efficient than the Nissan Interstar with 7.4 L/100km. The difference is about 2.5 L/100km.

Space Star

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the Nissan Interstar offers significantly more power – delivering 170 HP compared to 71 HP. That’s roughly 99 HP more horsepower.

Looking at top speed, the Nissan Interstar is very slightly faster – reaching 177 km/h, while the Mitsubishi Space Star tops out at 167 km/h. The difference is around 10 km/h.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Nissan Interstar delivers clearly more torque with 380 Nm compared to 102 Nm. That’s about 278 Nm more.

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Seats: Nissan Interstar offers more seats – 7 vs 5.

In terms of curb weight, Mitsubishi Space Star is considerably lighter – 940 kg compared to 2,053 kg. The difference is around 1,113 kg.

For maximum load capacity, the Nissan Interstar offers significantly more capacity – up to 13,000 L, about 12,088 L more than the Mitsubishi Space Star.

When it comes to payload, the Nissan Interstar carries substantially more – 1,447 kg compared to 400 kg. That’s a difference of about 1,047 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Nissan Interstar is clearly superior overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £34,900
Interstar

Nissan Interstar

  • Engine Type : Diesel, Electric
  • Transmission : Manuel, Automatic
  • Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 105 - 170 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 7.4 - 7.5 L/100km
  • Electric Range : 175 - 410 km
Nissan Interstar
Mitsubishi Space Star

Costs and Consumption

View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance

View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body

View detailed analysis

Nissan Interstar

The Nissan Interstar is a sensible, no-nonsense panel van that puts practicality front and center, with a cavernous load area and a durable feel built for daily work. It drives with surprising composure for its size, keeps running costs modest, and feels like the kind of professional tool that prefers reliable service over flashy showboating.

details

Mitsubishi Space Star

The Mitsubishi Space Star is a tidy, no-nonsense city car that squeezes surprising interior space into a compact, easy-to-park package. It's not a thrill-seeker's toy, but for buyers after low running costs, fuss-free reliability and sensible day-to-day practicality, it's a clever and cheerful choice that keeps your wallet and nerves happy.

details
Nissan Interstar
Mitsubishi Space Star

Costs and Consumption

Price
34,900 - 55,700 £
Price
11,600 - 18,700 £
Consumption L/100km
7.4 - 7.5 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
4.9 - 5.5 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
175 - 410 km
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
0 - 195 g/km
co2
112 - 125 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
80 L
Fuel tank capacity
35 L

Dimensions and Body

Body Type
Cargo Van
Body Type
Hatchback
Seats
3 - 7
Seats
5
Doors
4
Doors
5
Curb weight
2,053 - 2,535 kg
Curb weight
940 - 1,011 kg
Trunk capacity
-
Trunk capacity
209 - 235 L
Length
5,685 - 6,315 mm
Length
3,845 mm
Width
2,080 mm
Width
1,665 mm
Height
2,498 mm
Height
1,505 mm
Max trunk capacity
10,800 - 13,000 L
Max trunk capacity
881 - 912 L
Payload
965 - 1,447 kg
Payload
359 - 400 kg

Engine and Performance

Engine Type
Diesel, Electric
Engine Type
Petrol
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox, Reduction Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, CVT
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
105 - 170 HP
Power HP
71 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
-
Acceleration 0-100km/h
14.1 - 15.8 s
Max Speed
115 - 177 km/h
Max Speed
163 - 167 km/h
Torque
300 - 380 Nm
Torque
102 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4
Number of Cylinders
3
Power kW
77 - 125 kW
Power kW
52 kW
Engine capacity
1,997 cm3
Engine capacity
1,193 cm3

General

Model Year
2,024 - 2,025
Model Year
2,020 - 2,022
CO2 Efficiency Class
G, A
CO2 Efficiency Class
C, D
Brand
Nissan
Brand
Mitsubishi
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.