VS

Nissan Interstar vs Volvo V60 comparison

Compare performance (170 HP vs 455 HP), boot space and price (34,900 £ vs 41,600 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Nissan Interstar or Volvo V60?

Nissan Interstar vs Volvo V60: Key differences

Nissan Interstar

  • a bit cheaper
  • considerably more electric range

Volvo V60

5 (1 Reviews)
rate
  • considerably more power
  • significantly more efficient
  • moderately lighter

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Interstar

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.

Nissan Interstar is a bit cheaper – starting at 34,900 £ , while the Volvo V60 costs 41,600 £ . That’s a price difference of around 6,713 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Volvo V60 uses 2.4 L/100km and is significantly more efficient than the Nissan Interstar with 7.4 L/100km. The difference is about 5 L/100km.

As for electric range, the Nissan Interstar offers considerably more range – reaching up to 410 km, about 317 km more than the Volvo V60.

V60

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the Volvo V60 offers considerably more power – delivering 455 HP compared to 170 HP. That’s roughly 285 HP more horsepower.

Looking at top speed, the Volvo V60 is very slightly faster – reaching 180 km/h, while the Nissan Interstar tops out at 177 km/h. The difference is around 3 km/h.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Volvo V60 delivers substantially more torque with 709 Nm compared to 380 Nm. That’s about 329 Nm more.

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Seats: Nissan Interstar offers more seats – 7 vs 5.

In terms of curb weight, Volvo V60 is moderately lighter – 1,734 kg compared to 2,053 kg. The difference is around 319 kg.

For maximum load capacity, the Nissan Interstar offers clearly more capacity – up to 13,000 L, about 11,569 L more than the Volvo V60.

When it comes to payload, the Nissan Interstar carries considerably more – 1,447 kg compared to 506 kg. That’s a difference of about 941 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Nissan Interstar sits just ahead overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £34,900
Interstar

Nissan Interstar

  • Engine Type : Diesel, Electric
  • Transmission : Manuel, Automatic
  • Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 105 - 170 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 7.4 - 7.5 L/100km
  • Electric Range : 175 - 410 km
Nissan Interstar
Volvo V60

Costs and Consumption

View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance

View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body

View detailed analysis

Nissan Interstar

The Nissan Interstar is a sensible, no-nonsense panel van that puts practicality front and center, with a cavernous load area and a durable feel built for daily work. It drives with surprising composure for its size, keeps running costs modest, and feels like the kind of professional tool that prefers reliable service over flashy showboating.

details

Volvo V60

The Volvo V60 blends elegant Scandinavian design with a practical estate layout, making it a composed and sensible choice for buyers who want style without sacrifice. Inside, a serene cabin, clever safety features and a supple ride turn daily commutes and weekend getaways into effortless, grown-up motoring.

details
Nissan Interstar
Volvo V60

Costs and Consumption

Price
34,900 - 55,700 £
Price
41,600 - 65,000 £
Consumption L/100km
7.4 - 7.5 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
2.4 - 6.2 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
175 - 410 km
Electric Range
93 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
0 - 195 g/km
co2
54 - 140 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
80 L
Fuel tank capacity
60 L

Dimensions and Body

Body Type
Cargo Van
Body Type
Estate
Seats
3 - 7
Seats
5
Doors
4
Doors
5
Curb weight
2,053 - 2,535 kg
Curb weight
1,734 - 2,064 kg
Trunk capacity
-
Trunk capacity
519 L
Length
5,685 - 6,315 mm
Length
4,778 mm
Width
2,080 mm
Width
1,850 mm
Height
2,498 mm
Height
1,432 mm
Max trunk capacity
10,800 - 13,000 L
Max trunk capacity
1,431 L
Payload
965 - 1,447 kg
Payload
466 - 506 kg

Engine and Performance

Engine Type
Diesel, Electric
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Plugin Hybrid
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox, Reduction Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic, Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
105 - 170 HP
Power HP
197 - 455 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
-
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.6 - 7.6 s
Max Speed
115 - 177 km/h
Max Speed
180 km/h
Torque
300 - 380 Nm
Torque
300 - 709 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
77 - 125 kW
Power kW
145 - 335 kW
Engine capacity
1,997 cm3
Engine capacity
1,969 cm3

General

Model Year
2,024 - 2,025
Model Year
2,024 - 2,025
CO2 Efficiency Class
G, A
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, B
Brand
Nissan
Brand
Volvo
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.