VS

Nissan Juke vs Ford Tourneo Connect comparison

Compare performance (143 HP vs 150 HP), boot space and price (21,400 £ vs 27,300 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Nissan Juke or Ford Tourneo Connect?

Nissan Juke vs Ford Tourneo Connect: Key differences

Nissan Juke

5 (1 Reviews)
rate
  • noticeably cheaper
  • clearly lighter
details

Ford Tourneo Connect

4.9 (1 Reviews)
rate
  • marginally more power
  • clearly more efficient
  • significantly more trunk space
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Juke

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.

Nissan Juke is noticeably cheaper – starting at 21,400 £ , while the Ford Tourneo Connect costs 27,300 £ . That’s a price difference of around 5,957 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Ford Tourneo Connect uses 0.5 L/100km and is clearly more efficient than the Nissan Juke with 4.7 L/100km. The difference is about 4.2 L/100km.

Tourneo Connect

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the Ford Tourneo Connect offers marginally more power – delivering 150 HP compared to 143 HP. That’s roughly 7 HP more horsepower.

Both models accelerate almost equally fast – 10.1 s from 0 to 100 km/h.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Ford Tourneo Connect delivers substantially more torque with 350 Nm compared to 200 Nm. That’s about 150 Nm more.

Juke

Space and Everyday Use:

Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Nissan Juke is clearly lighter – 1,274 kg compared to 1,542 kg. The difference is around 268 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Ford Tourneo Connect offers significantly more boot space – 1,720 L compared to 422 L. That’s a difference of about 1,298 L.

When it comes to payload, the Ford Tourneo Connect carries significantly more – 818 kg compared to 427 kg. That’s a difference of about 391 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Ford Tourneo Connect is clearly superior overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £27,300
Tourneo Connect

Ford Tourneo Connect

  • Engine Type Plugin Hybrid, Petrol, Diesel
  • Transmission Automatic, Manuel
  • Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 102 - 150 HP
  • Consumption L/100km 0.5 - 6.9 L/100km
  • Electric Range 116 - 119 km
details

Frequently compared as well

Ford Tourneo Connect
Ford Tourneo Courier
VS
The Tourneo Connect and Tourneo Courier are Ford’s compact people-carriers that target different buyers — the Connect focuses on space and versatility for families and businesses, while the Courier prioritises city-friendly dimensions and efficiency. This short comparison highlights the key …
Nissan Juke
Opel Corsa
VS
The Nissan Juke is the cheeky crossover that turns heads with its funky looks and raised stance, promising a slightly sportier feel and SUV attitude for buyers who want personality over practicality. The Opel Corsa, by contrast, is the sensible, well-rounded hatchback — more economical, easier to …
Nissan Juke
Ford Tourneo Connect

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Nissan Juke

The Nissan Juke is a pocket-sized crossover that refuses to blend in, with quirky styling and a cheeky stance that turns heads at every traffic light. It’s ideal for shoppers who value personality and nimble urban driving over maximum practicality, delivering surprising pep and a well-equipped feel for everyday fun.

details
Fahraufnahmen (7)
Exterieur statisch (2)
Exterieur statisch (12)
Interieur (25)

Reviews Nissan Juke

5 (1 Reviews)
rate
Ali Shan
8 Dec 2025, 11:29:27

For more space and Efficiency, I would prefer Juke 1.5 Specially Accenta.

Ford Tourneo Connect

The Ford Tourneo Connect is a practical, surprisingly polished people-mover that balances family-friendly flexibility with car-like driving manners. With clever storage, sliding doors and a bright, airy cabin it’s a smart choice for buyers who want sensible versatility without sacrificing everyday comfort — and it’s oddly enjoyable to drive for its size.

details
2022_FORD_TOURNEOCONNECT__ACTIVE__EXT_07
2022_FORD_TOURNEOCONNECT__ACTIVE__EXT_08
2022_FORD_TOURNEOCONNECT__ACTIVE__EXT_13
2022_FORD_TOURNEOCONNECT__ACTIVE__INT_22
2022_FORD_TOURNEOCONNECT__ACTIVE__INT_31

Reviews Ford Tourneo Connect

4.9 (1 Reviews)
rate

No reviews yet. Share your experience and help others decide.

Frequently compared as well

Nissan Juke
Opel Mokka
VS
The Nissan Juke is a cheeky, compact crossover with bulging arches, zesty handling and personality to spare, while the Opel Mokka takes a more grown-up route — solid, spacious and quietly efficient with a neater cabin and calmer ride. Pick the Juke if you want to stand out and have fun on twisty …
Ford Tourneo Connect
Ford Transit Connect
VS
In the realm of versatile vans, the Ford Tourneo Connect and the Ford Transit Connect stand out as formidable contenders, each catering to different practical needs. The Tourneo Connect is lauded for its passenger-friendly design, offering a comfortable ride with ample seating and advanced …
Ford Tourneo Connect
Peugeot Rifter
VS
The Ford Tourneo Connect and the Peugeot Rifter are roomy, practical people-carriers aimed at buyers who need versatile family transport, but they take different approaches: the Tourneo Connect emphasises car-like handling and refined packaging, while the Rifter focuses on rugged styling and highly …
Nissan Juke
SEAT Arona
VS
The Nissan Juke and SEAT Arona are rival compact crossovers that blend city-friendly dimensions with SUV styling, yet they take markedly different approaches to design, driving feel and practicality. This comparison highlights the key strengths and compromises of each so you can quickly decide …
Hyundai Kona
Nissan Juke
VS
The Kona and the Juke are two of the most popular subcompact crossovers, each standing out with bold styling and a city-friendly footprint. This quick comparison looks at how the Kona and Juke stack up on comfort, practicality, performance and running costs so you can decide which suits your needs.
Nissan Juke
Toyota Yaris
VS
Choosing between the Nissan Juke and the Toyota Yaris means deciding if you want a bold, compact crossover with distinctive styling or a practical, efficient small hatchback renowned for reliability. I’ll compare driving feel, interior space, running costs and features to help you pick the one that …
Ford Tourneo Connect
VW Caddy
VS
The Ford Tourneo Connect is the family-hauler of choice, with cavernous space, clever seating options and a cushioned ride that turns school runs into mini road trips. The VW Caddy, by contrast, is the sharper, more car-like pick — tidier to drive, more efficient and better bonded to the tarmac, …
MG ZS
Nissan Juke
VS
Comparing the MG ZS and the Nissan Juke pits a practical, value-oriented small SUV (the MG ZS) against a more stylised, compact crossover with sharper driving character (the Nissan Juke). This quick guide highlights how they differ in space, equipment, engines and running costs so you can pick the …
Nissan Juke
Ford Tourneo Connect

Costs and Consumption
Price
21,400 - 30,100 £
Price
27,300 - 41,900 £
Consumption L/100km
4.7 - 6 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
0.5 - 6.9 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
-
Electric Range
116 - 119 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
105 - 136 g/km
co2
11 - 164 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
High Roof Estate
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,274 - 1,405 kg
Curb weight
1,542 - 1,781 kg
Trunk capacity
354 - 422 L
Trunk capacity
1,213 - 1,720 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,800 mm
Width
1,855 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
405 - 427 kg
Payload
563 - 818 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Petrol, Full Hybrid
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid, Petrol, Diesel
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic, Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic, Manual Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
114 - 143 HP
Power HP
102 - 150 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
10.1 - 11.8 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
10.1 - 13.5 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
200 Nm
Torque
220 - 350 Nm
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
84 - 105 kW
Power kW
75 - 110 kW
Engine capacity
999 - 1,598 cm3
Engine capacity
1,498 - 1,968 cm3

General
Model Year
2025
Model Year
2,024 - 2,025
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E, C
CO2 Efficiency Class
B, E, F
Brand
Nissan
Brand
Ford
Is the Nissan Juke offered with different drivetrains?

Available configurations include Front-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.