VS

Nissan Juke vs SEAT Arona comparison

Compare performance (143 HP vs 150 HP), boot space and price (21,400 £ vs 20,700 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Nissan Juke or SEAT Arona?

Nissan Juke vs SEAT Arona: Key differences

Nissan Juke

5 (1 Reviews)
rate
  • a bit more efficient
  • only slightly more trunk space
details

SEAT Arona

4.9 (4 Reviews)
rate
  • marginally cheaper
  • barely more power
  • visibly quicker 0–100 km/h
  • barely lighter
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Juke

Quick take: Nissan Juke VS SEAT Arona

Nissan Juke VS SEAT Arona places a styling-forward, gadget-rich contender against a pragmatic, value-led rival. The Nissan Juke leans into personality — a driver-focused cockpit, bold looks and an urban-friendly hybrid option — while the SEAT Arona trades flash for a more conventional, every‑day usability and sharper straight-line pep. That contrast defines most buyer decisions: pick the Juke if you want a car that feels distinctive and modern inside, choose the Arona if you want a no-nonsense package that delivers bang for your buck. Both are compact B‑SUVs suited to city life, but they translate that brief into different strengths and compromises. This page teases those differences in real-world terms before you dive into measured specs.

Arona

Character and driving dynamics

The Nissan Juke feels characterful and a little theatrical on the road, with quick steering and a chassis that rewards lively city cornering; that personality shows most around town and on twisty roads. The SEAT Arona, by contrast, aims for assured predictability: its steering is direct, the engine feels livelier under acceleration and it communicates confidence in everyday driving. In traffic the Juke’s dual‑clutch and hybrid systems can occasionally feel abrupt, whereas the Arona’s gearbox usually settles into a smoother rhythm except under heavy kickdown. If you value playful handling and a cockpit that makes driving feel engaging, the Juke leans sportier; if you prefer immediate, predictable responses and brisk real-world performance, the Arona is better tuned to that need.

Juke

Comfort, cabin feel and perceived quality

Step inside the Nissan Juke and the facelifted interior punches above its class with a large tilted screen and real buttons that give a premium, driver‑centric impression; the cabin feels modern but roads reveal audible wind and tyre noise earlier. The SEAT Arona’s cabin is more straightforward and pragmatic, with harder plastics but ergonomics that make daily tasks simpler and seats that deliver solid support over long stints. On rougher surfaces the Arona’s firmer ride can feel more clinical, while the Juke’s setup—even when tuned for sport—transmits more texture and occasional harshness, especially on larger wheels. Perceived quality favours the Juke’s refreshed design up front, but the Arona wins on calm, sensible packaging that won’t surprise you on a long motorway run.

Arona

Practicality and everyday usability

Practical differences are where compromises become obvious: the Nissan Juke prioritises style and a tidy footprint, but its rear seat and loading lip are less forgiving for frequent family duty or bulky cargo. The SEAT Arona presents a more straightforward load area and seating layout that make daily chores and grocery runs simpler, even if it isn’t class‑leading in volume. Both cars ask you to mind the high boot sill and to accept limited rear legroom for three adults, but the Arona’s predictable layout and slightly better payload feel more usable in real life. If regular weekend luggage or awkward loads are on your agenda the Arona’s pragmatic approach will frustrate less than the Juke’s fashion-first compromises.

Juke

City friendliness versus long‑distance behavior

In the city the Nissan Juke shines: compact turning, responsive hybrid recuperation and a cockpit you can live with daily make it excellent for short hops and tight parking. The SEAT Arona is equally easy to park and arguably more composed in steady urban driving, with tactile controls and an engine that gets on with the job without fuss. On motorways both cars expose their compromises — the Juke tends to be noisier and can feel fidgety on coarse tarmac, while the Arona stays composed but reveals a firm ride and audible wind/tyre noise at speed. For mostly urban commuters the Juke’s urban efficiency and character are attractive; for mixed routes or frequent longer drives the Arona’s steadier long‑distance manners give it the edge in comfort and everyday usability.

Arona

Buyer fit and the trade-offs to weigh before you compare specs

Choosing between the Nissan Juke and SEAT Arona is really about priorities: the Juke suits buyers who want standout design, a modern cockpit and city‑focused hybrid efficiency even if that means a tighter rear and a firmer, sometimes louder highway ride. The Arona suits buyers who prioritise everyday practicality, sharper real‑world acceleration and a more conservative, dependable interior that often comes at a friendlier price. If family flexibility, trunk practicality and quiet long runs matter, lean toward the Arona; if style, infotainment polish and urban efficiency top your list, the Juke will feel more rewarding. Below you’ll find the technical comparison so you can match those real‑world impressions to the measured differences that matter most to you.

Frequently compared as well

Ford Puma
SEAT Arona
VS
In one corner, the Ford Puma brings sporty flair and sharp handling to the small-SUV ring; in the other, the SEAT Arona sticks to sensible practicality and wallet-friendly charm. Which one wins your city commute, weekend escape and resale cheque comes down to whether you want fun on twisty roads or …
Renault Captur
SEAT Arona
VS
The Renault Captur and SEAT Arona are two of Europe’s most popular compact crossovers, each offering a city-friendly footprint with raised driving position and SUV styling. This short comparison focuses on practicality, driving character, running costs and feature value to help you pick the one …

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Juke

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.

SEAT Arona is marginally cheaper – starting at 20,700 £ , while the Nissan Juke costs 21,400 £ . That’s a price difference of around 685 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Nissan Juke uses 4.7 L/100km and is a bit more efficient than the SEAT Arona with 5.3 L/100km. The difference is about 0.6 L/100km.

Arona

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the SEAT Arona offers barely more power – delivering 150 HP compared to 143 HP. That’s roughly 7 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the SEAT Arona is visibly quicker – completing the sprint in 8.3 s, while the Nissan Juke takes 10.1 s. That’s about 1.8 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the SEAT Arona delivers slightly more torque with 250 Nm compared to 200 Nm. That’s about 50 Nm more.

Juke

Space and Everyday Use:

Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, SEAT Arona is barely lighter – 1,188 kg compared to 1,274 kg. The difference is around 86 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Nissan Juke offers only slightly more boot space – 422 L compared to 400 L. That’s a difference of about 22 L.

When it comes to payload, the SEAT Arona carries somewhat more – 522 kg compared to 427 kg. That’s a difference of about 95 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The SEAT Arona holds a solid overall lead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £20,700
Arona

SEAT Arona

  • Engine Type Petrol
  • Transmission Manuel, Automatic
  • Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 95 - 150 HP
  • Consumption L/100km 5.3 - 5.8 L/100km
details
Nissan Juke
SEAT Arona

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Nissan Juke

The Nissan Juke is a pocket-sized crossover that refuses to blend in, with quirky styling and a cheeky stance that turns heads at every traffic light. It’s ideal for shoppers who value personality and nimble urban driving over maximum practicality, delivering surprising pep and a well-equipped feel for everyday fun.

details
Fahraufnahmen (7)
Exterieur statisch (2)
Exterieur statisch (12)
Interieur (25)

Reviews Nissan Juke

5 (1 Reviews)
rate
Ali Shan
8 Dec 2025, 11:29:27

For more space and Efficiency, I would prefer Juke 1.5 Specially Accenta.

SEAT Arona

The SEAT Arona is a compact crossover that blends practical, city-friendly packaging with a sporty, youthful design. It delivers a comfortable ride, an intuitive cabin and economical running costs, making it a sensible pick for daily drives and weekend getaways.

details
seat-arona-One-car-countless-possibilities_07_HQ
seat-arona-One-car-countless-possibilities_06_HQ
seat-arona-One-car-countless-possibilities_04_HQ
seat-arona-One-car-countless-possibilities_02_HQ

Reviews SEAT Arona

4.9 (4 Reviews)
rate
Jorge Soares
29 May 2026, 20:19:35

É um excelente crossover...
Tem uma imagem desportiva e está bem equipado a nível de segurança e de tecnologia...
Tem uma óptima posição de condução...
É muito divertido de conduzir...
Só tenho pena de não trazer de fábrica o pneu sobresselente...

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Jorge Soares
26 Mar 2026, 01:31:22

Comprei há 2 meses o Seat Arona novo DE 95 cv... ´Trata-se da versão base...
Estou muito contente com o mesmo...
Tem um ótima posição elevada da condução, é económico, tem uma bagageira com uma boa capacidade de arrumação...
Considero que este B Suv tem uma aparência bem desportiva e atraente...
Só tenho pena deste carro não ter instalados de fábrica os faróis dianteiros de nevoeiro, nem a câmara de ré acho que isto faz muita falta a nível da segurança da condução... Só a versão superior do carro é que traz instalada isto tudo...

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): City / Short distance
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Frequently compared as well

SEAT Arona
VW T-Cross
VS
The SEAT Arona and the VW T-Cross are closely matched compact crossovers aimed at buyers who want city-friendly dimensions, practical interiors and a touch of SUV style. This comparison focuses on space, fuel economy, driving feel, safety and running costs to help you decide which suits your …
SEAT Arona
VW Taigo
VS
The SEAT Arona is the zesty city crossover that trades bravado for practicality, while the VW Taigo dresses up the same bones with a sleeker, coupé-like roofline — pick Arona for everyday sense and Taigo if style tops your shopping list. Both share VW Group underpinnings and efficient engines, so …
Nissan Juke
Opel Corsa
VS
The Nissan Juke is the cheeky crossover that turns heads with its funky looks and raised stance, promising a slightly sportier feel and SUV attitude for buyers who want personality over practicality. The Opel Corsa, by contrast, is the sensible, well-rounded hatchback — more economical, easier to …
SEAT Arona
VW T-Roc
VS
Sibling rivalry in compact-SUV clothing: the SEAT Arona and VW T‑Roc go head-to-head — one brings Spanish spice and value, the other German polish and refinement. We’ll compare driving feel, practicality, tech and running costs so you can pick the compact crossover that deserves a spot in your …
SEAT Arona
Skoda Kamiq
VS
Picking between the SEAT Arona and the Skoda Kamiq is largely a choice between a sportier, style-led crossover and a more practical, spacious, value-focused one. Both share similar underpinnings and efficient engines, but the Arona leans toward engaging looks and driving feel while the Kamiq …
SEAT Arona
SEAT Ibiza
VS
Think of the SEAT Arona as the chunky crossover that gives you a higher view of the road, more boot space and practical family-friendly packaging, while the SEAT Ibiza is the sharper, lighter hatch that’s more fun to hustle through town and returns better fuel economy. Pick the Arona if you want …
SEAT Arona
SEAT Leon
VS
City-smart crossover or grown-up hatchback — the SEAT Arona vs SEAT Leon is the clash many buyers face when choosing between style and substance. We take both on the road, test fuel use, boot space and driving feel, and pick the one that fits your commute, weekend plans and bank balance.
Nissan Juke
Opel Mokka
VS
The Nissan Juke is a cheeky, compact crossover with bulging arches, zesty handling and personality to spare, while the Opel Mokka takes a more grown-up route — solid, spacious and quietly efficient with a neater cabin and calmer ride. Pick the Juke if you want to stand out and have fun on twisty …
Nissan Juke
SEAT Arona

Costs and Consumption
Price
21,400 - 30,100 £
Price
20,700 - 30,300 £
Consumption L/100km
4.7 - 6 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
5.3 - 5.8 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
-
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
105 - 136 g/km
co2
120 - 132 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,274 - 1,405 kg
Curb weight
1,188 - 1,268 kg
Trunk capacity
354 - 422 L
Trunk capacity
400 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,800 mm
Width
1,780 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
405 - 427 kg
Payload
502 - 522 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Petrol, Full Hybrid
Engine Type
Petrol
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic, Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
114 - 143 HP
Power HP
95 - 150 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
10.1 - 11.8 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.3 - 11.1 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
200 Nm
Torque
175 - 250 Nm
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
Power kW
84 - 105 kW
Power kW
70 - 110 kW
Engine capacity
999 - 1,598 cm3
Engine capacity
999 - 1,498 cm3

General
Model Year
2025
Model Year
2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E, C
CO2 Efficiency Class
D
Brand
Nissan
Brand
SEAT
Is the Nissan Juke offered with different drivetrains?

Available configurations include Front-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.