Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
Česko
EspañaVS
Nissan Juke vs Mazda CX-60 comparison
Compare performance (143 HP vs 327 HP), boot space and price (21,400 £ vs 43,700 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Nissan Juke or Mazda CX-60?
Nissan Juke vs Mazda CX-60: Key differences
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
Juke
Costs and Efficiency:
Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.
Nissan Juke is considerably cheaper – starting at 21,400 £ , while the Mazda CX-60 costs 43,700 £ . That’s a price difference of around 22,286 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Mazda CX-60 uses 3.8 L/100km and is visibly more efficient than the Nissan Juke with 4.7 L/100km. The difference is about 0.9 L/100km.
CX-60
Engine and Performance:
Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.
When it comes to engine power, the Mazda CX-60 offers considerably more power – delivering 327 HP compared to 143 HP. That’s roughly 184 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Mazda CX-60 is considerably quicker – completing the sprint in 5.8 s, while the Nissan Juke takes 10.1 s. That’s about 4.3 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Mazda CX-60 delivers significantly more torque with 550 Nm compared to 200 Nm. That’s about 350 Nm more.
Juke
Space and Everyday Use:
Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, Nissan Juke is significantly lighter – 1,274 kg compared to 1,890 kg. The difference is around 616 kg.
Looking at boot space, the Mazda CX-60 offers visibly more boot space – 570 L compared to 422 L. That’s a difference of about 148 L.
When it comes to payload, the Mazda CX-60 carries noticeably more – 612 kg compared to 427 kg. That’s a difference of about 185 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The Mazda CX-60 is clearly superior overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
from £43,700
Mazda CX-60
Nissan Juke
Mazda CX-60
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Nissan Juke
The Nissan Juke is a pocket-sized crossover that refuses to blend in, with quirky styling and a cheeky stance that turns heads at every traffic light. It’s ideal for shoppers who value personality and nimble urban driving over maximum practicality, delivering surprising pep and a well-equipped feel for everyday fun.
details
Mazda CX-60
The Mazda CX-60 pairs sculpted, understated looks with poised handling and a cabin that punches above its class, making long drives feel unexpectedly civilized. For buyers who want a premium feel without the showroom swagger, it's the sort of car that earns respect quietly — and still manages a wink when you push on.
details
Nissan Juke
Mazda CX-60
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
21,400 - 30,100 £
|
Price
43,700 - 57,900 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
4.7 - 6 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
3.8 - 5.2 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
-
|
Electric Range
63 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
105 - 136 g/km
|
co2
85 - 137 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
1,274 - 1,405 kg
|
Curb weight
1,890 - 2,055 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
354 - 422 L
|
Trunk capacity
570 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,800 mm
|
Width
1,890 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
405 - 427 kg
|
Payload
581 - 612 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Petrol, Full Hybrid
|
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid, Diesel MHEV
|
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic, Automatic Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive, Rear-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
114 - 143 HP
|
Power HP
200 - 327 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
10.1 - 11.8 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.8 - 8.4 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
200 Nm
|
Torque
450 - 550 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
|
Number of Cylinders
4 - 6
|
|
Power kW
84 - 105 kW
|
Power kW
147 - 241 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
999 - 1,598 cm3
|
Engine capacity
2,488 - 3,283 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2025
|
Model Year
2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E, C
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
B, D, E
|
|
Brand
Nissan
|
Brand
Mazda
|
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved.
The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.