Compare performance (143 HP vs 156 HP), boot space and price (21400 £ vs 21000 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Nissan Juke or Peugeot 208?
In the ever-evolving automotive landscape, the subcompact crossover SUV and hatchback segments have seen intense competition. In this article, we delve into the Nissan Juke and the Peugeot 208, two popular choices in their categories. We'll scrutinize their technical specifications, innovations, and overall driving experiences to help you decide which suits your lifestyle better.
The Nissan Juke and Peugeot 208 cater to different tastes, having distinct design languages. The Nissan Juke, with its robust SUV stance, sports a bold exterior with flowing lines, a high waistline, and a cutting-edge front grille. Measuring 4210 mm in length, 1800 mm in width, and standing tall at 1593 mm, the Juke offers commanding road presence.
On the other hand, the Peugeot 208 embraces a sleek and sophisticated hatchback style. With a length of 4055 mm, a width of 1745 mm, and a height of 1430 mm, it provides a compact yet stylish silhouette, ideal for urban maneuverability.
Nissan delivers the Juke with a choice of petrol and full hybrid engines, with output ranging from 114 to 143 HP. The Juke's engine range is complemented by manual, dual-clutch automatic, and automatic transmissions, focusing on the versatility of performance. The SUV offers acceleration from 0-100 km/h in 10.1 to 11.8 seconds, reaching a top speed between 166 km/h and 180 km/h.
In contrast, the Peugeot 208 offers petrol MHEV, petrol, and electric powertrains, producing between 101 and 156 HP. Its acceleration varies across models, from 8.3 to 10.9 seconds for the 0-100 km/h sprint, and it can reach up to 200 km/h. Noteworthy is the electrified model with its impressive electric range of up to 410 km, highlighting Peugeot’s commitment to low-emission driving.
Fuel efficiency is a key strength for both models. The Nissan Juke promises consumption figures from 4.7 to 6 L/100km, and its CO2 emissions range from 107 to 137 g/km, placing it in the C to E efficiency classes.
The Peugeot 208 excels with a fuel consumption rate as low as 4.7 L/100km for petrol models, while the electric variant consumes between 14 and 16.1 kWh/100km. Additionally, emissions for the internal combustion models stretch from 0 (electric) to 121 g/km, reflecting the 208’s emphasis on sustainability.
The Nissan Juke, a five-seater like its competitor, invites occupants into a spacious cabin with a trunk capacity ranging from 354 to 422 liters, emphasizing practicality. Meanwhile, the Peugeot 208 offers a slightly tighter trunk space ranging from 265 to 309 liters but makes up for it with an ergonomically designed interior which elevates driver comfort and control.
Both the Nissan Juke and Peugeot 208 bring significant merits to the table. The Juke appeals to those who appreciate an SUV feel with flexibility in powertrains and a prominent design. In contrast, the Peugeot 208’s array of efficient engines—including a strong electric variant—combines with a charming hatchback aesthetic to cater to eco-conscious urban drivers.
Your choice between the two will likely come down to personal preference in design, performance priorities, and perhaps a leaning towards either futuristic electrification or proven hybrid versatility.
When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.
Peugeot 208 has a slight advantage in terms of price – it starts at 21000 £ , while the Nissan Juke costs 21400 £ . That’s a price difference of around 403 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Peugeot 208 manages with 4.50 L and is therefore slight more efficient than the Nissan Juke with 4.70 L. The difference is about 0.20 L per 100 km.
Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.
When it comes to engine power, the Peugeot 208 has a minimal edge – offering 156 HP compared to 143 HP. That’s roughly 13 HP more horsepower.
In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Peugeot 208 is noticeable quicker – completing the sprint in 8.30 s, while the Nissan Juke takes 10.10 s. That’s about 1.80 s faster.
There’s also a difference in torque: Peugeot 208 pulls distinct stronger with 270 Nm compared to 200 Nm. That’s about 70 Nm difference.
Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In curb weight, Peugeot 208 is minimal lighter – 1165 kg compared to 1274 kg. The difference is around 109 kg.
In terms of boot space, the Nissan Juke offers a bit more room – 422 L compared to 352 L. That’s a difference of about 70 L.
When it comes to payload, Peugeot 208 minimal takes the win – 430 kg compared to 427 kg. That’s a difference of about 3 kg.
The Peugeot 208 sits well ahead of its rival in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The Nissan Juke is a pocket-sized crossover that refuses to blend in, with quirky styling and a cheeky stance that turns heads at every traffic light. It’s ideal for shoppers who value personality and nimble urban driving over maximum practicality, delivering surprising pep and a well-equipped feel for everyday fun.
details
The Peugeot 208 feels like a city-savvy fox: compact, stylish and surprisingly grown-up, with a cabin that punches above its weight and enough personality to make daily commutes a little less boring. It’s a smart pick for buyers who want chic practicality without the showroom bluster — easy to park, thrifty to run and oddly fun when the road tightens up.
details
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
21400 - 31800 £
|
Price
21000 - 35200 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
4.7 - 6 L
|
Consumption L/100km
4.5 - 5.1 L
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
14.1 - 15.4 kWh
|
|
Electric Range
-
|
Electric Range
362 - 432 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
46 - 51 kWh
|
|
co2
105 - 136 g/km
|
co2
0 - 116 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
44 L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
Hatchback
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
1274 - 1405 kg
|
Curb weight
1165 - 1530 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
354 - 422 L
|
Trunk capacity
309 - 352 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
4055 mm
|
|
Width
1800 mm
|
Width
1745 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
1430 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
1118 - 1163 L
|
|
Payload
405 - 427 kg
|
Payload
380 - 430 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Petrol, Full Hybrid
|
Engine Type
Electric, Petrol MHEV, Petrol
|
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
|
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic, Automatic Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic, Manual Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
114 - 143 HP
|
Power HP
101 - 156 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
10.1 - 11.8 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.3 - 10.9 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
150 - 200 km/h
|
|
Torque
200 Nm
|
Torque
205 - 270 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
|
Number of Cylinders
3
|
|
Power kW
84 - 105 kW
|
Power kW
74 - 115 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
999 - 1598 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1199 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2025
|
Model Year
2023 - 2026
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E, C
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A, C, D
|
|
Brand
Nissan
|
Brand
Peugeot
|
Available configurations include Front-Wheel Drive.
Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
España