Compare performance (170 HP vs 233 HP), boot space and price (36,500 £ vs 64,700 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Nissan Primastar Transporter or Ford Nugget?
When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.
Nissan Primastar Transporter is considerably cheaper – starting at 36,500 £ , while the Ford Nugget costs 64,700 £ . That’s a price difference of around 28,245 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Nissan Primastar Transporter uses 6.8 L/100km and is markedly more efficient than the Ford Nugget with 8.9 L/100km. The difference is about 2.1 L/100km.
Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.
When it comes to engine power, the Ford Nugget offers markedly more power – delivering 233 HP compared to 170 HP. That’s roughly 63 HP more horsepower.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Ford Nugget delivers only slightly more torque with 390 Nm compared to 380 Nm. That’s about 10 Nm more.
Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.
Seats: Nissan Primastar Transporter offers more seats – 6 vs 5.
The Nissan Primastar Transporter is clearly superior overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The Nissan Primastar is a no-nonsense transporter that pairs rugged practicality with a surprisingly civilized cabin, so you arrive with your tools — and your temper — intact. It may not steal glances at the lights, but its sensible layout and dependable nature make it the kind of van you’ll happily rely on day in, day out.
details
The Ford Nugget is a versatile camper van designed for adventurers who crave both comfort and practicality on the road. With its clever use of space, the Nugget provides ample room for sleeping, cooking, and relaxing, making it a popular choice for those looking to experience the joys of a mobile lifestyle. Its design integrates seamlessly with modern technology, ensuring both convenience and a smooth driving experience.
detailsCosts and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
36,500 - 48,500 £
|
Price
64,700 - 78,700 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
6.8 - 7.9 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
8.9 - 9 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
-
|
Electric Range
-
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
178 - 206 g/km
|
co2
234 - 235 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
80 L
|
Fuel tank capacity
55 L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
Cargo Van
|
Body Type
Bus
|
|
Seats
3 - 6
|
Seats
4 - 5
|
|
Doors
4
|
Doors
4
|
|
Curb weight
1,860 - 2,075 kg
|
Curb weight
-
|
|
Trunk capacity
-
|
Trunk capacity
0 L
|
|
Length
5,080 - 5,480 mm
|
Length
5,450 mm
|
|
Width
1,956 mm
|
Width
2,032 mm
|
|
Height
1,971 - 2,486 mm
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
3,200 - 8,900 L
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
899 - 1,173 kg
|
Payload
-
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Diesel
|
Engine Type
Diesel, Plugin Hybrid
|
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox, CVT
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
110 - 170 HP
|
Power HP
150 - 233 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
-
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
-
|
|
Max Speed
160 - 178 km/h
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
300 - 380 Nm
|
Torque
360 - 390 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
|
Power kW
81 - 125 kW
|
Power kW
110 - 171 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1,997 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1,996 - 2,488 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2,021 - 2,025
|
Model Year
2,024 - 2,025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
G
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
G
|
|
Brand
Nissan
|
Brand
Ford
|