Compare performance (170 HP vs 122 HP), boot space and price (43,500 £ vs 30,800 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Nissan Primastar Transporter or Ford Transit Connect?
Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.
Ford Transit Connect is considerably cheaper – starting at 30,800 £ , while the Nissan Primastar Transporter costs 43,500 £ . That’s a price difference of around 12,719 £.
Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.
When it comes to engine power, the Nissan Primastar Transporter offers noticeably more power – delivering 170 HP compared to 122 HP. That’s roughly 48 HP more horsepower.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Nissan Primastar Transporter delivers somewhat more torque with 380 Nm compared to 320 Nm. That’s about 60 Nm more.
Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.
Seats: Nissan Primastar Transporter offers more seats – 6 vs 2.
In terms of curb weight, Ford Transit Connect is noticeably lighter – 1,575 kg compared to 1,926 kg. The difference is around 351 kg.
When it comes to payload, the Nissan Primastar Transporter carries noticeably more – 1,110 kg compared to 780 kg. That’s a difference of about 330 kg.
The Nissan Primastar Transporter is far ahead overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The Nissan Primastar is a no-nonsense transporter that pairs rugged practicality with a surprisingly civilized cabin, so you arrive with your tools — and your temper — intact. It may not steal glances at the lights, but its sensible layout and dependable nature make it the kind of van you’ll happily rely on day in, day out.
details
The Ford Transit Connect is the go-to compact workhorse for urban professionals who need cargo space without driving a full-size van. It balances practicality and everyday manners with clever storage ideas and a surprisingly comfortable ride, making it a sensible choice for small businesses and families who value function over flair.
detailsCosts and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
43,500 - 48,500 £
|
Price
30,800 - 35,300 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
6.8 - 7 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
-
|
Electric Range
-
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
178 - 184 g/km
|
co2
-
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
Cargo Van
|
Body Type
Cargo Van
|
|
Seats
3 - 6
|
Seats
2
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
1,926 - 2,075 kg
|
Curb weight
1,575 - 1,620 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
-
|
Trunk capacity
-
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,956 mm
|
Width
1,855 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
899 - 1,110 kg
|
Payload
775 - 780 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Diesel
|
Engine Type
Diesel
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Manuel
|
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
150 - 170 HP
|
Power HP
122 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
-
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
11.4 - 11.8 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
350 - 380 Nm
|
Torque
320 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
|
Power kW
110 - 125 kW
|
Power kW
90 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1,997 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1,968 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2025
|
Model Year
2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
G
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
-
|
|
Brand
Nissan
|
Brand
Ford
|