Compare performance (170 HP vs 286 HP), boot space and price (43,500 £ vs 49,700 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Nissan Primastar Transporter or Ford Transit Custom Transporter?
Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.
Nissan Primastar Transporter is somewhat cheaper – starting at 43,500 £ , while the Ford Transit Custom Transporter costs 49,700 £ . That’s a price difference of around 6,151 £.
Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.
When it comes to engine power, the Ford Transit Custom Transporter offers considerably more power – delivering 286 HP compared to 170 HP. That’s roughly 116 HP more horsepower.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Ford Transit Custom Transporter delivers noticeably more torque with 630 Nm compared to 380 Nm. That’s about 250 Nm more.
Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.
Both vehicles offer seating for 6 people.
The Ford Transit Custom Transporter is far ahead overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The Nissan Primastar is a no-nonsense transporter that pairs rugged practicality with a surprisingly civilized cabin, so you arrive with your tools — and your temper — intact. It may not steal glances at the lights, but its sensible layout and dependable nature make it the kind of van you’ll happily rely on day in, day out.
details
The Transit Custom is a clever, no-nonsense workhorse that blends roomy practicality with surprisingly car-like driving manners, so your workday feels less like a chore and more like efficient transport. With a sensible interior, smart storage and tidy handling, it’s the kind of van that makes owners smile while they get on with the job — reliable, unfussy and built to keep moving.
detailsCosts and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
43,500 - 48,500 £
|
Price
49,700 - 77,400 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
6.8 - 7 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
-
|
Electric Range
-
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
178 - 184 g/km
|
co2
0 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
Cargo Van
|
Body Type
Cargo Van
|
|
Seats
3 - 6
|
Seats
3 - 6
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
1,926 - 2,075 kg
|
Curb weight
-
|
|
Trunk capacity
-
|
Trunk capacity
-
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,956 mm
|
Width
2,032 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
899 - 1,110 kg
|
Payload
-
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Diesel
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
150 - 170 HP
|
Power HP
136 - 286 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
-
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
-
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
350 - 380 Nm
|
Torque
415 - 630 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
|
Power kW
110 - 125 kW
|
Power kW
100 - 210 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1,997 cm3
|
Engine capacity
-
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2025
|
Model Year
2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
G
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
|
Brand
Nissan
|
Brand
Ford
|