Compare performance (205 HP vs 145 HP), boot space and price (29,600 £ vs 16,200 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Nissan Qashqai or Citroen C3 Aircross?
In the bustling world of compact SUVs, two contenders stand out: the Citroen C3 Aircross and the Nissan Qashqai. Both offer a blend of style, innovation, and performance tailored for urban adventures. Let’s dissect their technical prowess and see which shines brighter for the 2024 model year.
The Citroen C3 Aircross presents diversity under its hood with options ranging from a traditional petrol engine to a cutting-edge electric powertrain. With power outputs spanning from 101 HP to 136 HP, it offers a practical balance between power and efficiency. Having a max torque of up to 230 Nm and an acceleration time of 11.4 seconds from 0-100 km/h, it caters well to everyday driving needs.
In contrast, the Nissan Qashqai is driven by a more potent lineup, including petrol mild hybrid and full hybrid options. The power range of 140 to 190 HP, coupled with a torque reaching up to 330 Nm, facilitates a brisk acceleration; the fastest model zooms to 100 km/h in 7.9 seconds. The Qashqai manages higher maximum speeds, enhancing its appeal for thrill-seekers.
C3 Aircross impresses with its eco-friendly credentials, especially in its electric variant boasting an electric range of over 300 km and a consumption as low as 18.2 kWh/100km. For petrol engines, it achieves noteworthy economy with consumption ranging between 5.5 and 6.2 L/100km.
Nissan Qashqai balances performance with fuel efficiency, offering consumption figures between 5.1 and 6.8 L/100km, thanks to its modern hybrid technology. Despite being slightly less efficient in its base models, its overall CO2 efficiency class remains competitive.
The Citroen C3 Aircross provides ample space with a trunk capacity of 460 liters, suitable for most family outings. Its dimensions, measuring at 4395 mm in length and 1795 mm in width, strike a balance between compact maneuverability and interior comfort.
Nissan's Qashqai surpasses slightly in bulk, offering a bigger trunk at 504 liters and expanded dimensions of 4425 mm in length and 1835 mm in width, ideal for those who frequently transport larger loads. Its enhanced configuration reflects in its payload capacity—an advantageous factor for adventurous expeditions.
Both models integrate technological advances, such as advanced driver-assistance systems, smartphone integration, and intuitive infotainment systems. The C3 Aircross shines with standard features like a customizable digital dashboard, whereas the Qashqai emphasizes its seamless hybrid technology and robust safety suite.
Choosing between the Citroen C3 Aircross and the Nissan Qashqai hinges on individual preferences. The C3 Aircross is perfect for drivers prioritizing urban efficiency and sustainability, particularly in its electric form. Conversely, the Qashqai's superior power, slightly larger frame, and innovative hybrid systems make it a prime choice for families seeking versatility and performance.
No matter the selection, both vehicles reflect modern strides in automotive excellence—testament to the innovative spirit steering the compact SUV segment. Both manufacturers promise a ride that is both dynamic and efficient, with just enough spice to make everyday drives delightfully unforgettable.
Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.
Citroen C3 Aircross is considerably cheaper – starting at 16,200 £ , while the Nissan Qashqai costs 29,600 £ . That’s a price difference of around 13,414 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Nissan Qashqai uses 4.5 L/100km and is somewhat more efficient than the Citroen C3 Aircross with 5.3 L/100km. The difference is about 0.8 L/100km.
Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.
When it comes to engine power, the Nissan Qashqai offers visibly more power – delivering 205 HP compared to 145 HP. That’s roughly 60 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Nissan Qashqai is substantially quicker – completing the sprint in 7.6 s, while the Citroen C3 Aircross takes 12.3 s. That’s about 4.7 s quicker.
Looking at top speed, the Nissan Qashqai is markedly faster – reaching 206 km/h, while the Citroen C3 Aircross tops out at 143 km/h. The difference is around 63 km/h.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Nissan Qashqai delivers visibly more torque with 330 Nm compared to 230 Nm. That’s about 100 Nm more.
Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, Citroen C3 Aircross is barely lighter – 1,312 kg compared to 1,420 kg. The difference is around 108 kg.
Looking at boot space, the Nissan Qashqai offers only slightly more boot space – 504 L compared to 460 L. That’s a difference of about 44 L.
For maximum load capacity, the Citroen C3 Aircross offers barely more capacity – up to 1,600 L, about 153 L more than the Nissan Qashqai.
When it comes to payload, the Nissan Qashqai carries somewhat more – 520 kg compared to 462 kg. That’s a difference of about 58 kg.
The Nissan Qashqai is decisively ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The Nissan Qashqai blends practical, family-friendly packaging with SUV styling that refuses to shout, making it a sensible and dependable choice for everyday life. It’s comfortable to live with, economical on the road, and neatly equipped enough to feel modern without ever feeling precious — perfect if you want crossover versatility without the drama.
details
The Citroën C3 Aircross is a cheeky compact SUV that trades bland conformity for playful French character and clever practicality, ideal if you want a car with personality. It soaks up city life with a comfortable ride, inventive cabin tricks and a look that turns heads without asking for attention.
details
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
29,600 - 39,900 £
|
Price
16,200 - 28,900 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
4.5 - 6.8 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
5.3 - 5.9 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
16.1 - 18.3 kWh/100km
|
|
Electric Range
-
|
Electric Range
303 - 400 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
102 - 154 g/km
|
co2
0 - 134 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
55 L
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
1,420 - 1,665 kg
|
Curb weight
1,312 - 1,608 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
479 - 504 L
|
Trunk capacity
460 L
|
|
Length
4,425 mm
|
Length
4,395 mm
|
|
Width
1,835 mm
|
Width
1,795 mm
|
|
Height
1,625 mm
|
Height
1,640 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1,422 - 1,447 L
|
Max trunk capacity
1,600 L
|
|
Payload
466 - 520 kg
|
Payload
407 - 462 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Full Hybrid
|
Engine Type
Electric, Petrol, Petrol MHEV
|
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
|
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, CVT, Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox, Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
140 - 205 HP
|
Power HP
101 - 145 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.6 - 10.2 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
12.3 - 13 s
|
|
Max Speed
170 - 206 km/h
|
Max Speed
143 km/h
|
|
Torque
240 - 330 Nm
|
Torque
125 - 230 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
|
Number of Cylinders
3
|
|
Power kW
103 - 151 kW
|
Power kW
74 - 107 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1,332 - 1,498 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1,199 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
|
Model Year
2,024 - 2,026
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, C
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A, D
|
|
Brand
Nissan
|
Brand
Citroen
|
Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
España