Compare performance (130 HP vs 150 HP), boot space and price (25,700 £ vs 26,700 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Nissan Townstar or Ford Transit Connect?
When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.
Nissan Townstar is marginally cheaper – starting at 25,700 £ , while the Ford Transit Connect costs 26,700 £ . That’s a price difference of around 1,019 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Ford Transit Connect uses 0.5 L/100km and is substantially more efficient than the Nissan Townstar with 6.7 L/100km. The difference is about 6.2 L/100km.
As for electric range, the Nissan Townstar offers significantly more range – reaching up to 281 km, about 163 km more than the Ford Transit Connect.
Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.
When it comes to engine power, the Ford Transit Connect offers moderately more power – delivering 150 HP compared to 130 HP. That’s roughly 20 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Ford Transit Connect is a bit quicker – completing the sprint in 11.4 s, while the Nissan Townstar takes 12.6 s. That’s about 1.2 s quicker.
Looking at top speed, the Ford Transit Connect is very slightly faster – reaching 186 km/h, while the Nissan Townstar tops out at 183 km/h. The difference is around 3 km/h.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Ford Transit Connect delivers visibly more torque with 350 Nm compared to 245 Nm. That’s about 105 Nm more.
Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.
Seats: Nissan Townstar offers more seats – 7 vs 5.
In terms of curb weight, Ford Transit Connect is barely lighter – 1,477 kg compared to 1,509 kg. The difference is around 32 kg.
For maximum load capacity, the Ford Transit Connect offers moderately more capacity – up to 3,700 L, about 650 L more than the Nissan Townstar.
When it comes to payload, the Ford Transit Connect carries a bit more – 792 kg compared to 641 kg. That’s a difference of about 151 kg.
The Ford Transit Connect is decisively ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The Nissan Townstar is a pragmatic city companion that blends clever packaging with a calm, easygoing drive, making it ideal for urban errands and small-business hauls. It won't win any style contests, but its tidy interior, sensible features and no-nonsense character make it a genuinely useful buy for people who value practicality over pizzazz.
detailsThe Ford Transit Connect is the go-to compact workhorse for urban professionals who need cargo space without driving a full-size van. It balances practicality and everyday manners with clever storage ideas and a surprisingly comfortable ride, making it a sensible choice for small businesses and families who value function over flair.
detailsCosts and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
25,700 - 37,700 £
|
Price
26,700 - 41,500 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
6.7 - 7 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
0.5 - 5.8 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
19.3 - 20.7 kWh/100km
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
265 - 281 km
|
Electric Range
118 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
45 kWh
|
Battery Capacity
19.7 kWh
|
|
co2
0 - 157 g/km
|
co2
11 - 153 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
54 L
|
Fuel tank capacity
32 - 50 L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
High Roof Estate
|
Body Type
Cargo Van
|
|
Seats
5 - 7
|
Seats
2 - 5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
4
|
|
Curb weight
1,509 - 2,041 kg
|
Curb weight
1,477 - 1,866 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
0 - 775 L
|
Trunk capacity
-
|
|
Length
4,488 - 4,911 mm
|
Length
4,500 - 4,868 mm
|
|
Width
1,859 - 1,860 mm
|
Width
1,855 mm
|
|
Height
1,838 - 1,869 mm
|
Height
1,856 - 1,860 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
2,800 - 3,050 L
|
Max trunk capacity
2,500 - 3,700 L
|
|
Payload
506 - 641 kg
|
Payload
602 - 792 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Petrol, Electric
|
Engine Type
Diesel, Plugin Hybrid
|
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic, Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
122 - 130 HP
|
Power HP
102 - 150 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
12.6 - 13.3 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
11.4 - 13.5 s
|
|
Max Speed
135 - 183 km/h
|
Max Speed
175 - 186 km/h
|
|
Torque
240 - 245 Nm
|
Torque
280 - 350 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
|
Power kW
90 - 96 kW
|
Power kW
75 - 110 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1,332 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1,498 - 1,968 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2,023 - 2,025
|
Model Year
2,024 - 2,025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, F, A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, B
|
|
Brand
Nissan
|
Brand
Ford
|