In the competitive compact segment, the Peugeot 308 and Renault Arkana present contrasting approaches to style and practicality. While the Peugeot 308 is known for its sleek design and engaging driving dynamics, the Renault Arkana stands out with its coupé-like silhouette and extended rear space. Enthusiasts seeking a blend of performance and aesthetics will find both models appealing, yet each caters to different tastes and needs in the ever-evolving automotive landscape.
In the modern automotive landscape, the choice between hatchbacks and SUVs often mirrors consumer preferences for practicality, style, and performance. Two noteworthy contenders in this segment are the Peugeot 308 and the Renault Arkana. This article delves into a comparison of these two vehicles, examining their technical specifications, innovative features, and overall driving experience to help you make an informed decision.
The Peugeot 308 stands as a classic hatchback, renowned for its sporty design and compact layout. Measuring 4,367 mm in length, 1,852 mm in width, and 1,441 mm in height, it strikes a balance between agile handling and interior comfort, making it ideal for urban settings.
In contrast, the Renault Arkana presents a bold SUV profile, boasting dimensions of 4,568 mm in length, 1,821 mm in width, and 1,576 mm in height. The coupe-like silhouette offers a distinctive aesthetic, catering to consumers who desire both sportiness and spaciousness.
Under the hood, the Peugeot 308 offers a versatile selection of engines, including petrol, diesel, plug-in hybrid, and electric options. Power ranges from a respectable 130 HP to a robust 225 HP, facilitating various driving styles. Notably, the 308’s best-in-class hybrid variant boasts an impressive electric range of up to 57 km and a consumption figure of just 1.3 L/100 km, thanks to its advanced MHEV technology.
On the other hand, the Renault Arkana primarily features full hybrid and petrol MHEV powertrains, with power outputs ranging from 140 HP to 158 HP. Its acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h varies between 9.1 and 10.8 seconds, demonstrating solid performance for an SUV. However, when it comes to fuel efficiency, the Arkana excels with a consumption rating of as low as 4.7 L/100 km, outperforming its hatchback rival in this respect.
Both models come equipped with automatic transmission options, enhancing the overall driving experience. The Peugeot 308 features a sophisticated dual-clutch automatic gearbox, which provides quick and smooth gear shifts. Meanwhile, the Arkana's automatic transmission is also highly regarded for its responsiveness, ensuring a seamless driving experience.
Both vehicles are front-wheel drive, and while the 308 excels in agile maneuverability, the Arkana offers a higher ride height, affording better visibility and commanding road presence. This difference may heavily influence your preference based on your driving style and requirements.
Inside the 308, drivers are greeted with a modern cockpit outfitted with a 10-inch touchscreen that integrates advanced connectivity options, including Apple CarPlay and Android Auto. The ergonomic layout and high-quality materials ensure a comfortable ride for all five passengers.
The Renault Arkana, too, boasts a spacious cabin, focusing on driver and passenger comfort. Its trunk capacity of 480 to 513 liters exceeds that of the 308, making it a more suitable option for families or those needing extra cargo space. The interior features a user-friendly infotainment system that supports similar smartphone integration technologies, providing a seamless digital experience.
Ultimately, the decision between the Peugeot 308 and Renault Arkana largely hinges on your unique needs and preferences. The 308 is an excellent choice for those who appreciate the lively driving dynamics of a hatchback combined with advanced eco-friendly technologies. In contrast, the Arkana serves those in search of a stylish, spacious, and fuel-efficient SUV, ideal for family usage.
In a world where automotive choices abound, both models demonstrate that innovation and practicality can coexist, offering a glimpse into the future of vehicle design and usability.
|
|
|
|
Costs and Consumption |
|
---|---|
Price
about 25000 - 40700
£
|
Price
about 25300 - 31900
£
|
Consumption L/100km
1.3 - 5.9
L
|
Consumption L/100km
4.7 - 6
L
|
Consumption kWh/100km
15.6
kWh
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Electric Range
57 - 419
km
|
Electric Range
-
|
Battery Capacity
11.3 - 51
kWh
|
Battery Capacity
0.6
kWh
|
co2
112, 127, 132, 133, 30, 0
g/km
|
co2
106 - 135
g/km
|
Fuel tank capacity
40 - 53
L
|
Fuel tank capacity
50
L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
Body Type
Hatchback
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
5
|
Curb weight
1333 - 1759
kg
|
Curb weight
1411 - 1510
kg
|
Trunk capacity
361 - 412
L
|
Trunk capacity
480 - 513
L
|
Length
4367
mm
|
Length
4568
mm
|
Width
1852
mm
|
Width
1821
mm
|
Height
1441
mm
|
Height
1576
mm
|
Payload
412 - 510
kg
|
Payload
451 - 465
kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Petrol, Diesel, Plugin Hybrid, Electric
|
Engine Type
Full Hybrid, Petrol MHEV
|
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic, Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox, Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Power HP
130 - 225
HP
|
Power HP
140 - 158
HP
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.5 - 10.6
s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
9.1 - 10.8
s
|
Max Speed
170 - 235
km/h
|
Max Speed
172 - 174
km/h
|
Torque
230 - 360
Nm
|
Torque
205 - 270
Nm
|
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
Power kW
96 - 165
kW
|
Power kW
103 - 116
kW
|
Engine capacity
1199 - 1598
cm3
|
Engine capacity
1332 - 1598
cm3
|
Top speed
170 - 235
km/h
|
Top speed
172 - 174
km/h
|
General |
|
Model Year
2023 - 2024
|
Model Year
2023 - 2024
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
C, D, B, A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
C, D
|
Brand
Peugeot
|
Brand
Renault
|
The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.