Compare performance (143 HP vs 200 HP), boot space and price (28,500 £ vs 29,900 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Renault Arkana or Renault Austral?
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
The Renault Arkana and Renault Austral are two SUVs that exemplify the evolution of automotive design and technology under the Renault brand. Each model brings its unique strengths to the table, catering to different preferences and needs in the increasingly competitive SUV market. This article explores a side-by-side comparison of these two innovative vehicles, focusing on their technical specifications and standout features.
Both the Arkana and Austral boast modern and sleek designs that appeal to a broad audience. The Arkana measures 4568 mm in length, 1821 mm in width, and 1576 mm in height, making it slightly larger than the Austral, which has dimensions of 4510 mm in length, 1825 mm in width, and a height of 1618 mm. This difference in size may impact interior spaciousness and road presence, though both vehicles are designed to convey a sporty yet sophisticated look.
Engine options for the Arkana include a range of choices: a full hybrid producing up to 143 HP, a petrol MHEV variant with outputs of 140 to 158 HP, and a torque range of 205 to 270 Nm. The model exhibits impressive fuel efficiency, with consumption figures as low as 4.7 L/100 km, and offers an acceleration from 0-100 km/h in as little as 9.1 seconds.
On the other hand, the Austral offers robust engine alternatives, notably a petrol MHEV and a full hybrid engine. With power ratings reaching up to 200 HP and similar torque levels at 270 Nm, the Austral also competes favorably in performance. It excels in fuel economy as well, providing consumption figures as low as 4.7 L/100 km and the ability to reach 100 km/h in just 8.4 seconds.
Both models come with automatic transmissions, although the Arkana also includes a dual-clutch option, ensuring smooth gear shifts. The Austral features a continuously variable transmission (CVT) in its engine lineup, further emphasizing the focus on efficiency and comfort. Both SUVs are front-wheel drive, catering to urban drivers who prioritize maneuverability in city conditions.
Interior design in both the Arkana and Austral focuses on driver convenience and passenger comfort. Both vehicles have a seating capacity of five and feature modern infotainment systems equipped with the latest technology. The Arkana’s trunk capacity ranges from 480 to 513 liters, while the Austral offers 500 to 430 liters of boot space depending on the configuration. This slight advantage in trunk space might appeal more to families or those with more cargo needs.
When it comes to eco-friendliness, both models exhibit impressive CO2 emissions figures. The Arkana’s emissions range from 106 to 135 g/km, while the Austral has a range from 105 to 139 g/km, placing them in competitive CO2 efficiency classes. The hybrid options in both vehicles represent a shift towards more sustainable driving, allowing eco-conscious consumers to minimize their environmental impact.
The Renault Arkana and Renault Austral offer distinct advantages, making the choice between the two largely dependent on individual preferences. The Arkana shines with slightly more trunk space and a broader range of engine choices, while the Austral impresses with its powerful engine options and greater acceleration capabilities. Ultimately, potential buyers will need to weigh these factors alongside personal taste in aesthetics and desired driving experience.
In conclusion, both the Renault Arkana and Austral exemplify Renault’s commitment to innovation, efficiency, and modern design, making them formidable contenders in today’s SUV landscape. Whether you are drawn to the Arkana’s sporty elegance or the Austral’s robust performance, both models present exciting opportunities for drivers seeking a dynamic and stylish ride.
Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.
Renault Arkana is very slightly cheaper – starting at 28,500 £ , while the Renault Austral costs 29,900 £ . That’s a price difference of around 1,457 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Renault Arkana uses 4.7 L/100km and is only slightly more efficient than the Renault Austral with 4.8 L/100km. The difference is about 0.1 L/100km.
Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.
When it comes to engine power, the Renault Austral offers markedly more power – delivering 200 HP compared to 143 HP. That’s roughly 57 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Renault Austral is visibly quicker – completing the sprint in 8.4 s, while the Renault Arkana takes 10.8 s. That’s about 2.4 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Renault Austral delivers markedly more torque with 270 Nm compared to 205 Nm. That’s about 65 Nm more.
Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, Renault Arkana is marginally lighter – 1,510 kg compared to 1,548 kg. The difference is around 38 kg.
When it comes to payload, the Renault Austral carries only slightly more – 477 kg compared to 451 kg. That’s a difference of about 26 kg.
The Renault Austral holds a decisive overall lead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The Renault Arkana turns heads with its coupe-like roofline and SUV practicality, offering stylish presence without pretending to be a supercar. It feels composed and economical on everyday roads, making it a savvy choice for buyers who want flair and sensible running costs with a wink rather than a roar.
details
The Renault Austral dresses the family SUV in elegant modern looks and a surprisingly grown-up cabin that feels thoughtful and livable. It balances comfort and clever technology with a relaxed road presence—an appealing choice for buyers who want style and everyday sense without fuss.
details
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
28,500 - 31,900 £
|
Price
29,900 - 37,800 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
4.7 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
4.8 - 6.4 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
-
|
Electric Range
-
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
106 g/km
|
co2
109 - 145 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
55 L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
1,510 kg
|
Curb weight
1,548 - 1,613 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
-
|
Trunk capacity
527 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
4,533 mm
|
|
Width
1,821 mm
|
Width
1,825 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
1,645 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
1,736 L
|
|
Payload
451 kg
|
Payload
455 - 477 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Full Hybrid
|
Engine Type
Full Hybrid, Petrol MHEV
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox, CVT
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
143 HP
|
Power HP
148 - 200 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
10.8 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.4 - 9.9 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
180 km/h
|
|
Torque
205 Nm
|
Torque
270 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
|
|
Power kW
105 kW
|
Power kW
109 - 147 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1,598 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1,199 - 1,332 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2,025
|
Model Year
2,025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
C
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
C, E
|
|
Brand
Renault
|
Brand
Renault
|
Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
España