VS

Peugeot Rifter vs Suzuki Swace comparison

Compare performance (130 HP vs 140 HP), boot space and price (22,900 £ vs 31,900 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Peugeot Rifter or Suzuki Swace?

Peugeot Rifter vs Suzuki Swace: Key differences

Peugeot Rifter

4.6 (2 Reviews)
rate
  • noticeably cheaper
details

Suzuki Swace

4.1 (1 Reviews)
rate
  • only slightly more power
  • noticeably more efficient
  • markedly quicker 0–100 km/h
  • marginally lighter
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Rifter

Costs and Efficiency:

When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.

Peugeot Rifter is noticeably cheaper – starting at 22,900 £ , while the Suzuki Swace costs 31,900 £ . That’s a price difference of around 9,017 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Suzuki Swace uses 4.5 L/100km and is noticeably more efficient than the Peugeot Rifter with 5.4 L/100km. The difference is about 0.9 L/100km.

Swace

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the Suzuki Swace offers only slightly more power – delivering 140 HP compared to 130 HP. That’s roughly 10 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Suzuki Swace is markedly quicker – completing the sprint in 9.4 s, while the Peugeot Rifter takes 11.3 s. That’s about 1.9 s quicker.

Rifter

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Seats: Peugeot Rifter offers more seats – 7 vs 5.

In terms of curb weight, Suzuki Swace is marginally lighter – 1,475 kg compared to 1,498 kg. The difference is around 23 kg.

When it comes to payload, the Peugeot Rifter carries substantially more – 814 kg compared to 360 kg. That’s a difference of about 454 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Peugeot Rifter holds a slight edge in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £22,900
Rifter

Peugeot Rifter

  • Engine Type : Petrol, Diesel
  • Transmission : Manuel, Automatic
  • Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 102 - 130 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 5.4 - 6.5 L/100km
details

Frequently compared as well

Citroen Berlingo
Peugeot Rifter
VS
When the Citroën Berlingo and Peugeot Rifter go head-to-head it’s basically the same clever van in two different outfits: the Berlingo is the pragmatic hero with cavernous loadspace, clever cubbies and a soft, comfortable ride, while the Rifter dresses up the same underpinnings with sharper looks, …
Suzuki Swace
Toyota Corolla
VS
Think of this as a family-friendly duel: the Suzuki Swace, a sensible, value-focused take on Toyota’s proven hybrid estate, versus the Toyota Corolla, the familiar all-rounder that’s been refining the formula for years. Which one gives you smarter value, a more engaging drive and lower running …
Peugeot Rifter
Suzuki Swace

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Peugeot Rifter

The Peugeot Rifter is a practical, family-friendly people carrier that makes everyday errands and weekend escapes feel effortless thanks to its airy cabin and clever, flexible interior. With chunky, purposeful styling and storage solutions everywhere, the Rifter manages to be both unashamedly useful and unexpectedly likeable.

details
PEUGEOT_RIFTER_2102STYP003_Aufhaenger
PEUGEOT_RIFTER_2102STYP100
PEUGEOT_RIFTER_2102STYP101
PEUGEOT_RIFTER_2102STYP207

Reviews Peugeot Rifter

4.6 (2 Reviews)
rate
retrovill13@gmail.com
5 May 2026, 18:40:42

Citroen Berlingo -ПО дизайну напоминает ,те летающее тарелки из фильма ФАНТОМАС.Где время когда Франция не имела представления ,как должен выглядеть автомобиль.

А вот PEUGEOT RIFTER -Это уже уровень моего представления семейного внедорожника-красовера,и рабочей симпатичной лошадки.Эго и выбрал за это .

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Company car / Business
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Suzuki Swace

The Suzuki Swace is a pragmatic estate that swaps showy design for roomy practicality and a quiet, comfortable ride that suits everyday family life. It won't thrill the enthusiast, but its sensible charm, dependable build and clever packaging make it a smart pick for buyers who want fuss-free usability rather than headline-grabbing performance.

details
SUZUKI KARTE-1849_sRGB
SUZUKI KARTE-1774_sRGB
SUZUKI KARTE-1627_sRGB
SUZUKI KARTE-2074_sRGB
Suzuki_Swace_2

Reviews Suzuki Swace

4.1 (1 Reviews)
rate
Sjors
16 Apr 2026, 11:06:18

I have the Swace — it drives much more frugally than you state: 1:23. A downside as you get older is that getting in, and especially getting out, becomes harder because of the low seating position. The advantage of the low seat is better fuel economy. 16‑inch wheels are also likely to be more economical than larger ones. Rear legroom is poor. It would be nice if the rear bench were on rails like the Renault Twingo. Shrinking the boot would give more rear legroom. The 2014 Toyota Prius was the last to offer lots of rear legroom — after that it’s been rubbish.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Long-distance driver
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Frequently compared as well

Peugeot Rifter
Toyota Proace City
VS
Packed with flexible seating and playful French styling, the Peugeot Rifter aims to be the family-friendly MPV that doubles as an outdoor companion; the Toyota Proace City, meanwhile, is the no-nonsense, work-ready alternative that leans on Toyota’s reputation for reliability and practicality. We …
Peugeot Partner
Peugeot Rifter
VS
The Peugeot Partner and the Peugeot Rifter are closely related but aimed at different buyers: the Partner is a practical small van focused on load-carrying and work use, while the Rifter is the more passenger-oriented, lifestyle MPV version. I’ll compare their space, comfort, driving character and …
Peugeot Rifter
VW Caddy
VS
The Peugeot Rifter and the VW Caddy are practical, spacious compact MPVs/compact vans aimed at families and small-business users; this comparison looks at space, comfort, efficiency and value to help you decide which fits your needs. The Rifter leans toward SUV-like styling and rugged practicality, …
Ford Tourneo Connect
Peugeot Rifter
VS
The Ford Tourneo Connect and the Peugeot Rifter are roomy, practical people-carriers aimed at buyers who need versatile family transport, but they take different approaches: the Tourneo Connect emphasises car-like handling and refined packaging, while the Rifter focuses on rugged styling and highly …
Peugeot Rifter
Renault Kangoo
VS
Comparing the Peugeot Rifter and the Renault Kangoo is a practical look at two versatile, family‑friendly MPVs that also serve well as light work vans. The Rifter offers a more car‑like driving feel and contemporary styling, while the Kangoo focuses on cargo flexibility and clever utility for …
Ford Tourneo Courier
Peugeot Rifter
VS
The Ford Tourneo Courier and the Peugeot Rifter are practical, compact MPVs that deliver versatile space and sensible running costs for families and small-business users. I’ll compare their space, comfort, driving character and running costs so you can decide which one suits your day-to-day needs.
Opel Combo
Peugeot Rifter
VS
Unsure whether the Opel Combo or the Peugeot Rifter is the better match? Compare both models directly and discover differences in power, efficiency, comfort and value for money — all summarized in one easy view to support your decision.
Suzuki Swace
Toyota Corolla Touring Sports
VS
In a head-to-head comparison between the Suzuki Swace and the Toyota Corolla Touring Sports, both cars deliver remarkable hybrid performance with a focus on fuel efficiency and practicality. The Suzuki Swace, essentially a rebadged version of the Corolla, offers nearly identical interiors and …
Peugeot Rifter
Suzuki Swace

Costs and Consumption
Price
22,900 - 30,100 £
Price
31,900 £
Consumption L/100km
5.4 - 6.5 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
4.5 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
-
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
142 - 157 g/km
co2
102 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
43 L

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
High Roof Estate
Body Type
Estate
Seats
5 - 7
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
5
Curb weight
1,498 - 1,694 kg
Curb weight
1,475 kg
Trunk capacity
-
Trunk capacity
596 L
Length
-
Length
4,655 mm
Width
1,848 mm
Width
1,790 mm
Height
-
Height
1,460 mm
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
1,606 L
Payload
518 - 814 kg
Payload
360 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Petrol, Diesel
Engine Type
Full Hybrid
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
CVT
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
102 - 130 HP
Power HP
140 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
11.3 - 13.5 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
9.4 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
180 km/h
Torque
205 - 300 Nm
Torque
-
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
75 - 96 kW
Power kW
103 kW
Engine capacity
1,199 - 1,499 cm3
Engine capacity
1,798 cm3

General
Model Year
2026
Model Year
2024
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, F
CO2 Efficiency Class
C
Brand
Peugeot
Brand
Suzuki
Is the Peugeot Rifter offered with different drivetrains?

Available configurations include Front-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.