VS

Renault Arkana vs Omoda 9 comparison

Compare performance (143 HP vs 537 HP), boot space and price (28,500 £ vs 45,300 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Renault Arkana or Omoda 9?

Renault Arkana vs Omoda 9: Key differences

Renault Arkana

4 (7 Reviews)
rate
  • clearly cheaper
  • substantially lighter
details

Omoda 9

4.8 (2 Reviews)
rate
  • substantially more power
  • clearly more efficient
  • significantly quicker 0–100 km/h
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Arkana

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.

Renault Arkana is clearly cheaper – starting at 28,500 £ , while the Omoda 9 costs 45,300 £ . That’s a price difference of around 16,885 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Omoda 9 uses 1.6 L/100km and is clearly more efficient than the Renault Arkana with 4.7 L/100km. The difference is about 3.1 L/100km.

9

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the Omoda 9 offers substantially more power – delivering 537 HP compared to 143 HP. That’s roughly 394 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Omoda 9 is significantly quicker – completing the sprint in 4.9 s, while the Renault Arkana takes 10.8 s. That’s about 5.9 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Omoda 9 delivers significantly more torque with 650 Nm compared to 205 Nm. That’s about 445 Nm more.

Arkana

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Renault Arkana is substantially lighter – 1,510 kg compared to 2,270 kg. The difference is around 760 kg.

When it comes to payload, the Renault Arkana carries barely more – 451 kg compared to 447 kg. That’s a difference of about 4 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Omoda 9 is clearly superior overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

£45,342
9

Omoda 9

  • Engine Type Plugin Hybrid
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 537 HP
  • Consumption L/100km 1.6 L/100km
  • Electric Range 145 km
details

Frequently compared as well

Lynk & Co 08
Omoda 9
VS
The Lynk & Co 08 and the Omoda 9 are two fresh contenders in the compact SUV segment, each promising standout styling, modern tech and family-friendly space. This quick comparison focuses on the real differences in driving feel, interior quality, fuel efficiency and value so you can decide which …
XPeng G9
Omoda 9
VS
The XPeng G9 and Omoda 9 are two electric SUVs that square off on range, tech features and overall value—each targets buyers who want a spacious, high-tech mid‑size EV. This short comparison will focus on their driving feel, interior quality, charging performance and pricing to help you pick the …
Renault Arkana
Omoda 9

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Renault Arkana

The Renault Arkana turns heads with its coupe-like roofline and SUV practicality, offering stylish presence without pretending to be a supercar. It feels composed and economical on everyday roads, making it a savvy choice for buyers who want flair and sensible running costs with a wink rather than a roar.

details
r210653p
r210654p
r210665p
r210657p
r210613p
r210616p

Reviews Renault Arkana

4 (7 Reviews)
rate
Sonja
8 Apr 2026, 14:14:58

We've been driving the Arkana RS Line mild-hybrid for almost five years — and we're mega satisfied. At first everyone turned to stare. It's a good car to cover motorway miles, and fuel consumption of about 6.4 l/100 km is acceptable. Since our contract is ending, we're parting with the Arkana despite the lovely years together and switching to the Symbioz full-hybrid 160 Alpine Line. Hopefully we'll have a great time with it too.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Cesare
29 Jan 2026, 09:29:59

An excellent compromise between styling, practicality, space and fuel consumption. It’s not a sporty coupe, but practical for everyday use, with balanced purchase and running costs.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Hans Persson
19 Sept 2025, 16:05:49

An almost fully equipped car that's economical and stylish.

Omoda 9

The Omoda 9 blends bold, contemporary styling with a surprisingly spacious and well-appointed interior that punches above its class. It offers a composed, comfortable ride and modern infotainment and safety features that make it a strong choice for buyers wanting a practical yet stylish family crossover.

details
IMG_3964
IMG_3965

Reviews Omoda 9

4.8 (2 Reviews)
rate
Tommy
11 Jun 2026, 08:29:12

I recently bought the Omoda 9 — it's a premium car at the right price.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Frequently compared as well

MG MGS9
Omoda 9
VS
The MG MGS9 and Omoda 9 are two bold, tech-focused SUVs from rising Chinese brands, both aimed at buyers who want roomy interiors, strong equipment levels and distinct styling without premium-brand prices. This comparison looks past the headlines to help you choose which one fits your …
Renault Arkana
Renault Symbioz
VS
Here’s a straightforward comparison between the Renault Arkana and the Renault Symbioz to help you decide which fits your needs. The Arkana is a production compact crossover focused on practicality and hybrid efficiency, while the Symbioz is Renault’s forward-looking electric concept showcasing …
Nissan Qashqai
Renault Arkana
VS
The Qashqai and Arkana are two compact SUVs that take different approaches: the Qashqai focuses on everyday practicality and comfort, while the Arkana trades a bit of rear space for a sportier, coupe-like profile and distinctive style. I’ll compare them on the things that matter—space and …
BYD Sealion 7
Omoda 9
VS
The BYD Sealion 7 and Omoda 9 are direct rivals in the modern, tech-forward family car space, each promising strong value, roomy cabins and a long feature list. This comparison will help you see how the Sealion 7’s approach to efficiency and refinement stacks up against the Omoda 9’s emphasis on …
BYD Seal U
Omoda 9
VS
Comparing the BYD Seal U and the Omoda 9 pits BYD’s sleek, tech-focused electric contender against Omoda’s bold, well-equipped midsize SUV — two very different takes on modern motoring. This quick head-to-head will help you decide whether you value the Seal U’s electric efficiency and advanced tech …
Skoda Kodiaq
Omoda 9
VS
Skoda Kodiaq and Omoda 9 go head-to-head: compare performance, space, features and price in one quick overview to see which model suits your daily driving, budget and lifestyle better. A clear, side-by-side look helps you make the smarter choice. || Unsure whether the Skoda Kodiaq or the Omoda 9 …
Renault Arkana
Renault Rafale
VS
The Renault Arkana and Renault Rafale represent two different takes on Renault's crossover line-up: the Arkana is a compact, value-focused coupe-SUV, while the Rafale aims higher as a larger, more premium fastback crossover packed with technology. This comparison strips away the marketing to help …
Toyota RAV4
Omoda 9
VS
The RAV4 and the Omoda 9 represent two distinct approaches to the compact SUV: the RAV4 is a well-proven, practical choice with strong resale and dealer support, while the Omoda 9 brings bold styling and a tech-rich package at a competitive price. This short comparison will help you weigh long-term …
Renault Arkana
Omoda 9

Costs and Consumption
Price
28,500 - 31,900 £
Price
45,300 £
Consumption L/100km
4.7 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
1.6 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
-
Electric Range
145 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
106 g/km
co2
38 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,510 kg
Curb weight
2,270 kg
Trunk capacity
-
Trunk capacity
471 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,821 mm
Width
1,920 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
451 kg
Payload
447 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Full Hybrid
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
143 HP
Power HP
537 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
10.8 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.9 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
205 Nm
Torque
650 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
105 kW
Power kW
395 kW
Engine capacity
1,598 cm3
Engine capacity
1,499 cm3

General
Model Year
2025
Model Year
2026
CO2 Efficiency Class
C
CO2 Efficiency Class
B
Brand
Renault
Brand
Omoda
What drive types are available for the Renault Arkana?

The Renault Arkana is offered with Front-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.