@ Nissan Motor Corporation
@ Renault Group Media
VS

Nissan Qashqai vs Renault Arkana – Performance, range & efficiency compared

Both models have their strengths – but which one suits you more?
Compare performance, efficiency, price and space directly: Nissan Qashqai or Renault Arkana?

Qashqai @ Nissan Motor Corporation

Introduction to the Showdown: Nissan Qashqai vs Renault Arkana

In the ever-evolving world of SUVs, the Nissan Qashqai and Renault Arkana have made significant impressions with their unique blend of practicality and performance. As consumers gravitate towards vehicles that boast stylish designs, innovative features, and efficient engines, this comparison examines the technical aspects and cutting-edge innovations of both models to help you decide which SUV fits the bill.

Arkana @ Renault Group Media

Design and Dimensions

Both the Nissan Qashqai and Renault Arkana embody the sporty yet practical aesthetic that modern drivers crave. The Qashqai measures 4425 mm in length, 1835 mm in width, and stands 1625 mm tall, offering a robust presence on the road. On the other hand, the Arkana is slightly larger, spanning 4568 mm in length, 1821 mm in width, and a height of 1576 mm. This dimensional advantage translates to a more spacious cabin and trunk, with the Arkana featuring a trunk capacity of 513 liters compared to Qashqai's 504 liters.

Qashqai @ Nissan Motor Corporation

Engine Performance and Options

Engine performance is where these two models start to diverge. The Qashqai offers a range of engine choices, including petrol MHEV and full hybrid options, producing horsepower ranging from 140 to 190 HP. In contrast, the Arkana also delivers a competitive lineup with full hybrid and petrol MHEV engines, providing a power output between 140 and 158 HP. The Qashqai edges ahead with a maximum torque of 330 Nm, compared to Arkana's top torque of 270 Nm, which is crucial for acceleration and performance.

Arkana @ Renault Group Media

Transmission and Drive Type

The Qashqai caters to diverse driving preferences with options for both manual and automatic transmissions, including a CVT and reduction gearbox, while also offering front-wheel drive and all-wheel drive configurations. Conversely, the Arkana limits its offerings to an automatic transmission and front-wheel drive. This limitation may appeal to those prioritizing ease of driving but might not satisfy enthusiasts looking for a more engaging experience.

Qashqai @ Nissan Motor Corporation

Fuel Efficiency

Fuel efficiency is a critical factor for many SUV buyers, and here, the Arkana shines with an impressive consumption rate as low as 4.7 L/100km, thanks to its hybrid technology. The Qashqai, although slightly thirstier with a maximum consumption of 6.8 L/100km, still provides respectable efficiency, especially considering its performance capabilities. In terms of CO2 emissions, the Arkana also has an advantage, producing as low as 106 g/km, while the Qashqai ranges between 116 and 154 g/km.

Arkana @ Renault Group Media

Acceleration and Speed

When it comes to acceleration, the Qashqai showcases its muscle with a 0-100 km/h time as quick as 7.9 seconds for its most powerful variant. The Arkana, while competitive, offers a top acceleration time of 9.1 seconds. Furthermore, the Qashqai's top speed can reach up to 206 km/h, compared to the Arkana's maximum of 174 km/h, making the Qashqai a more exhilarating option for those who enjoy a spirited drive.

Qashqai @ Nissan Motor Corporation

Technological Innovations

Both vehicles are equipped with modern technology to enhance the driving experience. The Qashqai features Nissan's ProPILOT Assist, a semi-autonomous driving aid that makes highway drives feel fluid and efficient. The Arkana, meanwhile, boasts a comprehensive infotainment system that integrates well with smartphones via Apple CarPlay and Android Auto. Both models offer advanced safety features, but the Qashqai's additional driver assistance technology slightly tilts the scale in its favor.

Arkana @ Renault Group Media

Conclusion: Which SUV Reigns Supreme?

Deciding between the Nissan Qashqai and Renault Arkana ultimately boils down to individual preferences and driving needs. The Qashqai emerges as a well-rounded vehicle with superior performance metrics, diverse engine options, and advanced technological innovations. However, the Arkana offers remarkable fuel efficiency and a stylish design that may resonate better with urban drivers concerned about eco-friendliness. Both models represent their respective brands well, catering to a growing market that values both functionality and flair.

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Qashqai @ Nissan Motor Corporation

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.

Renault Arkana has a minimal advantage in terms of price – it starts at 28500 £, while the Nissan Qashqai costs 29400 £. That’s a price difference of around 934 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Renault Arkana manages with 4.70 L and is therefore slight more efficient than the Nissan Qashqai with 5.10 L. The difference is about 0.40 L per 100 km.

Arkana @ Renault Group Media

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the Nissan Qashqai has a clearly perceptible edge – offering 190 HP compared to 143 HP. That’s roughly 47 HP more horsepower.

In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Nissan Qashqai is distinct quicker – completing the sprint in 7.90 s, while the Renault Arkana takes 10.80 s. That’s about 2.90 s faster.

In terms of top speed, the Nissan Qashqai performs a bit better – reaching 206 km/h, while the Renault Arkana tops out at 172 km/h. The difference is around 34 km/h.

There’s also a difference in torque: Nissan Qashqai pulls evident stronger with 330 Nm compared to 205 Nm. That’s about 125 Nm difference.

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In curb weight, Nissan Qashqai is slight lighter – 1420 kg compared to 1510 kg. The difference is around 90 kg.

In terms of boot space, the Nissan Qashqai offers barely noticeable more room – 504 L compared to 480 L. That’s a difference of about 24 L.

In maximum load capacity, the Nissan Qashqai performs somewhat better – up to 1447 L, which is about 184 L more than the Renault Arkana.

When it comes to payload, Nissan Qashqai to a small extent takes the win – 520 kg compared to 451 kg. That’s a difference of about 69 kg.

Who comes out on top?

Overall, the Nissan Qashqai shows itself to be is largely superior and secures the title of DriveDuel Champion.
It convinces with the more balanced overall package and proves to be the more versatile choice for everyday use.

from about £29,400
Qashqai @ Nissan Motor Corporation

Nissan Qashqai

  • Engine Type : Petrol MHEV, Full Hybrid
  • Transmission : Manuel, Automatic
  • Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 140 - 190 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 5.1 - 6.8 L

Nissan Qashqai

The Nissan Qashqai blends practical, family-friendly packaging with SUV styling that refuses to shout, making it a sensible and dependable choice for everyday life. It’s comfortable to live with, economical on the road, and neatly equipped enough to feel modern without ever feeling precious — perfect if you want crossover versatility without the drama.

details

Renault Arkana

4 (1)
rate

The Arkana stands out with its striking coupe-SUV design, blending sporty aesthetics with practicality. Its bold silhouette and high ride height offer a unique presence on the road, attracting attention wherever it goes. Inside, the Arkana combines modern technology with comfort, making it a versatile choice for both city driving and weekend getaways.

details
Nissan Qashqai
Renault Arkana
Qashqai @ Nissan Motor Corporation
Arkana @ Renault Group Media

Costs and Consumption

Price
29400 - 42500 £
Price
28500 - 31900 £
Consumption L/100km
5.1 - 6.8 L
Consumption L/100km
4.70 L
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
-
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
0.60 kWh
co2
116 - 154 g/km
co2
106 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
55 L
Fuel tank capacity
50 L

Dimensions and Body

Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
5
Doors
5
Curb weight
1420 - 1665 kg
Curb weight
1510 kg
Trunk capacity
479 - 504 L
Trunk capacity
480 L
Length
4425 mm
Length
4568 mm
Width
1835 mm
Width
1821 mm
Height
1625 mm
Height
1576 mm
Max trunk capacity
1422 - 1447 L
Max trunk capacity
1263 L
Payload
466 - 520 kg
Payload
451 kg

Engine and Performance

Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Full Hybrid
Engine Type
Full Hybrid
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, CVT, Reduction Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
140 - 190 HP
Power HP
143 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.9 - 10.2 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
10.80 s
Max Speed
170 - 206 km/h
Max Speed
172 km/h
Torque
240 - 330 Nm
Torque
205 Nm
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
103 - 140 kW
Power kW
105 kW
Engine capacity
1332 - 1497 cm3
Engine capacity
1598 cm3

General

Model Year
2024
Model Year
2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, D
CO2 Efficiency Class
C
Brand
Nissan
Brand
Renault
Is the Nissan Qashqai offered with different drivetrains?

Available configurations include Front-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.

The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.