Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
EspañaVS
Renault Arkana vs Skoda Scala comparison
Compare performance (143 HP vs 150 HP), boot space and price (28,500 £ vs 21,400 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Renault Arkana or Skoda Scala?
Renault Arkana vs Skoda Scala: Key differences
Renault Arkana
3.8 (6 Reviews)
Customer feedback generally presents the Arkana as an economical, stylish and practical family crossover that suits everyday needs. Owners often praise its fuel economy, space and safety, while noting it isn’t a sporty coupe; a few reports of serious mechanical issues and costly repairs also appear. Opinions are mixed enough that broader reliability trends aren’t fully clear from the available comments.
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
Arkana
Costs and Efficiency:
Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.
Skoda Scala is noticeably cheaper – starting at 21,400 £ , while the Renault Arkana costs 28,500 £ . That’s a price difference of around 7,029 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Renault Arkana uses 4.7 L/100km and is only slightly more efficient than the Skoda Scala with 5 L/100km. The difference is about 0.3 L/100km.
Scala
Engine and Performance:
Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.
When it comes to engine power, the Skoda Scala offers marginally more power – delivering 150 HP compared to 143 HP. That’s roughly 7 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Skoda Scala is clearly quicker – completing the sprint in 8.2 s, while the Renault Arkana takes 10.8 s. That’s about 2.6 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Skoda Scala delivers somewhat more torque with 250 Nm compared to 205 Nm. That’s about 45 Nm more.
Arkana
Space and Everyday Use:
Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, Skoda Scala is visibly lighter – 1,199 kg compared to 1,510 kg. The difference is around 311 kg.
When it comes to payload, the Renault Arkana carries very slightly more – 451 kg compared to 431 kg. That’s a difference of about 20 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The Skoda Scala stands well ahead of its rival in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
from £21,400
Skoda Scala
Renault Arkana
Skoda Scala
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Renault Arkana
The Arkana stands out with its striking coupe-SUV design, blending sporty aesthetics with practicality. Its bold silhouette and high ride height offer a unique presence on the road, attracting attention wherever it goes. Inside, the Arkana combines modern technology with comfort, making it a versatile choice for both city driving and weekend getaways.
details
Skoda Scala
The Skoda Scala is a tidy, no-nonsense hatch that wraps clever packaging and composed manners into a compact, grown-up package. It’s the sensible choice for buyers who want everyday practicality with a dash of style and personality—no drama, just reliable charm.
details
Renault Arkana
Skoda Scala
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
28,500 - 31,900 £
|
Price
21,400 - 31,500 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
4.7 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
5 - 5.6 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
-
|
Electric Range
-
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
106 g/km
|
co2
114 - 126 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
50 L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
Hatchback
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
1,510 kg
|
Curb weight
1,199 - 1,271 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
-
|
Trunk capacity
467 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
4,362 mm
|
|
Width
1,821 mm
|
Width
1,793 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
1,514 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
1,410 L
|
|
Payload
451 kg
|
Payload
403 - 431 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Full Hybrid
|
Engine Type
Petrol
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
143 HP
|
Power HP
95 - 150 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
10.8 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.2 - 10.8 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
192 - 221 km/h
|
|
Torque
205 Nm
|
Torque
175 - 250 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
|
|
Power kW
105 kW
|
Power kW
70 - 110 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1,598 cm3
|
Engine capacity
999 - 1,498 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2,025
|
Model Year
2,025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
C
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
C, D
|
|
Brand
Renault
|
Brand
Skoda
|
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved.
The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.