Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
EspañaVS
Renault Arkana vs Subaru Outback comparison
Compare performance (143 HP vs 169 HP), boot space and price (28,500 £ vs 40,000 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Renault Arkana or Subaru Outback?
Renault Arkana vs Subaru Outback: Key differences
Renault Arkana
3.8 (6 Reviews)
Customer feedback generally presents the Arkana as an economical, stylish and practical family crossover that suits everyday needs. Owners often praise its fuel economy, space and safety, while noting it isn’t a sporty coupe; a few reports of serious mechanical issues and costly repairs also appear. Opinions are mixed enough that broader reliability trends aren’t fully clear from the available comments.
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
Arkana
Costs and Efficiency:
Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.
Renault Arkana is substantially cheaper – starting at 28,500 £ , while the Subaru Outback costs 40,000 £ . That’s a price difference of around 11,563 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Renault Arkana uses 4.7 L/100km and is considerably more efficient than the Subaru Outback with 8.6 L/100km. The difference is about 3.9 L/100km.
Outback
Engine and Performance:
Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.
When it comes to engine power, the Subaru Outback offers somewhat more power – delivering 169 HP compared to 143 HP. That’s roughly 26 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Subaru Outback is barely quicker – completing the sprint in 10.2 s, while the Renault Arkana takes 10.8 s. That’s about 0.6 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Subaru Outback delivers slightly more torque with 252 Nm compared to 205 Nm. That’s about 47 Nm more.
Arkana
Space and Everyday Use:
Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, Renault Arkana is very slightly lighter – 1,510 kg compared to 1,643 kg. The difference is around 133 kg.
When it comes to payload, the Subaru Outback carries somewhat more – 557 kg compared to 451 kg. That’s a difference of about 106 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The Renault Arkana is far ahead overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
from £28,500
Renault Arkana
Renault Arkana
Subaru Outback
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Renault Arkana
The Arkana stands out with its striking coupe-SUV design, blending sporty aesthetics with practicality. Its bold silhouette and high ride height offer a unique presence on the road, attracting attention wherever it goes. Inside, the Arkana combines modern technology with comfort, making it a versatile choice for both city driving and weekend getaways.
details
Subaru Outback
The Subaru Outback is the do-it-all wagon for buyers who want SUV capability without the SUV bulk, blending rugged confidence with everyday civility. It's practical, dependable, and built to shrug off rough gravel tracks or rainy commutes with a grin — ideal for buyers who actually use their vehicles, not just park them for show.
details
Renault Arkana
Subaru Outback
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
28,500 - 31,900 £
|
Price
40,000 - 44,400 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
4.7 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
8.6 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
-
|
Electric Range
-
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
106 g/km
|
co2
193 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
Estate
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
1,510 kg
|
Curb weight
1,643 - 1,676 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
-
|
Trunk capacity
561 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,821 mm
|
Width
1,875 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
451 kg
|
Payload
524 - 557 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Full Hybrid
|
Engine Type
Petrol
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
CVT
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
143 HP
|
Power HP
169 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
10.8 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
10.2 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
205 Nm
|
Torque
252 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
|
Power kW
105 kW
|
Power kW
124 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1,598 cm3
|
Engine capacity
2,498 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2,025
|
Model Year
2,024
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
C
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
G
|
|
Brand
Renault
|
Brand
Subaru
|
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved.
The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.